We performed a comparison between GoodAccess and Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Their user interface is intuitive as it is easy to navigate."
"Static IP Addresses with multiple gateway options per team allow us to set up different teams with different network accesses."
"It has become an integral part of our remote work toolkit, as it enables us to overcome USA IP restrictions, ensuring our global teams can collaborate effectively."
"GoodAccess simplified our infrastructure and how we interact with clients."
"Access control allows us to manage permissions efficiently, ensuring secure and tailored access."
"No extra hardware is needed, and it is very easy to set up"
"The solution has easy-to-use administration and offers an easy implementation."
"GoodAccess offers a very available professional support service - it can be via chat service, email, or phone."
"The solution can be used for building the infrastructure on the cloud."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"I can access the information whenever I want. It's integration is easy. The tool's GUI is easy to use with an IT background. The value benefits of using it include the ability to avoid storing data on local machines, reducing the risk of data loss"
"I find the GCS Portal to be particularly valuable. It is more user-friendly and easier to navigate compared to other cloud providers, such as AWS. I particularly appreciate the user interface of GCS."
"The platform’s most valuable features include storage, machine, and cloud functionality."
"Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy provides more control of our assets because normally when you're using Google Cloud, you have to use your Google email. IAP can control the assets that only come from the dedicated company or IP address."
"There is a certain accessibility feature that I can set using a cloud identity, which is really valuable to us."
"Since the solution works with Terraform, it makes Infrastructure as Code (IaC) easier."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →
"They need to provide a more comprehensive app that shows more data that appears on the GoodAccess site."
"The interface information could show more information about how threats have occurred. Right now, it only shows basic threat information."
"Enhancing the user interface and experience could make it more intuitive for all users."
"The installable app's occasional bugs have caused disruptions for some users, impacting smooth usage."
"The interface could provide more extensive information regarding the occurrence of threats. Currently, it only displays rudimentary threat data."
"For small organizations, it works great. However, the larger the organization, the more scalable the pricing model, the better, since gateways can be very expensive if an organization needs multiple gateways."
"Adding one user at a time to the package as compared to blocks of five would be helpful. Currently, we end up with empty seats on our plans."
"Currently, the pricing structure is functional yet could benefit from more refined scalability calculations."
"Google Cloud Platform is not a product that is very flexible for end-users, especially owing to the fact that there is not much documentation available for the product."
"The hard part is creating the pack because our applications are in Azure Data Proxy, Data Fabric, and Data Factory. Our team used these tools in Azure, but in the future, they will transition to GCP."
"The integration of the solution for patching, updating, and installing the updates could be better."
"The product’s migration process could be easier to understand."
"The product’s user interface must be more user-friendly and detailed."
"They should include case studies to learn about the use cases."
"There is room for improvement in the tools and features available on the GCP. In particular, the managed databases and queues could be improved, and it would be beneficial to have more offerings in areas such as data science and data warehousing. Additionally, GCP could benefit from offering similar tools to those offered by its competitors, such as Amazon AWS's Redshift."
"The solution should have better integration."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →
GoodAccess is ranked 7th in ZTNA with 19 reviews while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 6th in ZTNA with 44 reviews. GoodAccess is rated 9.2, while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of GoodAccess writes "Robust, allows for remote work, and has comprehensive support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". GoodAccess is most compared with , whereas Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Cisco Duo. See our GoodAccess vs. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy report.
See our list of best ZTNA vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
