Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025
Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and GoodAccess compete in the cloud-based security solutions category. Google appears to have the upper hand in scalability and integration, while GoodAccess excels in security and ease of use.
Features: Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy offers robust scalability, efficient resource management, and seamless Kubernetes integration. It also features advanced access policy control and BigQuery integration. GoodAccess provides point-to-point security with its Cloud Connector, static IPs for secure connections, and detailed usage reports. Its threat alert system and intuitive interface further enhance its security offerings.
Room for Improvement: Users of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy see opportunities for improvement in its pricing model, integration features, and user interface, suggesting the need for more intuitive usage and comprehensive support. GoodAccess users point to interface-related enhancements, improved threat data visibility, and better pricing structure handling. They also request advanced threat detection, increased log retention, and broader server coverage.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions support installations across public, private, and hybrid cloud environments. Google offers diverse deployment options, although there are occasional reports of technical support challenges. GoodAccess is praised for user-friendly deployment but users sometimes seek more extensive technical support availability.
Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is viewed as an expensive solution with mixed opinions on ROI, though it is sometimes seen as offering greater value than AWS. GoodAccess is not considered cheap but is seen as cost-effective given its security and ease of use, with scalable licensing suited for budget-conscious organizations.
