"l like the high download speed of the solution. Of course, it depends on which country you're using, but most countries are fast, and the solution doesn't limit your internet speed very much."
"The most valuable feature of Pulse Client is integration with Google authenticator for two-factor authentication."
"The scalability of Pulse Client is good."
"The problem with the solution is that most of the time, it uses a certain IP address that does not change much. If I'm using a different country, like Germany, it still uses the same IP address, and the downside is that this doesn't work well with services like Netflix because Netflix realizes that I'm using a VPN."
"Pulse Client could improve the system tokens for authentication."
"Pulse Client could improve the reports. The reports are not in PDF and we can't check the details in the reports of users who are using the VPNs."
Golden Frog VyprVPN is ranked 17th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Pulse Client is ranked 19th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 2 reviews. Golden Frog VyprVPN is rated 8.0, while Pulse Client is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Golden Frog VyprVPN writes "A stable solution that is easy to set up and offers high download speeds". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pulse Client writes "Integrates well, highly reliable, but lacking reporting". Golden Frog VyprVPN is most compared with , whereas Pulse Client is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
