GitLab vs Polyspace Code Prover comparison

GitLab and MathWorks are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6, while MathWorks is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.8. GitLab holds a 2.8% mindshare in AS, compared to MathWorks’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of MathWorks users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 84 GitLab reviews

3,342 Views
2,379 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Polyspace Code Prover

Read 6 Polyspace Code Prover reviews

1,574 Views
989 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

GitLab

Polyspace Code Prover

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

GitLab and Polyspace Code Prover are competing software tools in the tech ecosystem. GitLab has the upper hand with its lower pricing and strong user support, while Polyspace Code Prover stands out due to its specialized features aimed at safety-critical systems.

Features: GitLab provides versatile version control, continuous integration/continuous deployment, and collaborative capabilities. Polyspace Code Prover focuses on static code analysis, high precision in safety-critical systems, and thorough code verification.

Room for Improvement: GitLab users suggest enhancing performance speed, improving integration with third-party tools, and refining the user interface. Polyspace Code Prover could benefit from a more intuitive interface, better documentation for beginners, and streamlined routine tasks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab is praised for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Polyspace Code Prover, while generally user-friendly, needs improved customer service responsiveness to compete with GitLab's efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab attracts users with competitive pricing, offering good ROI for small to medium-sized projects. Polyspace Code Prover justifies its higher cost with robust ROI for enterprises needing advanced code verification in high-assurance scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Polyspace Code Prover Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Polyspace Code Prover

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (6th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (3rd), DevSecOps (1st)

Polyspace Code Prover

Ranking in Application Security Tools

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.8%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polyspace Code Prover is 1.3%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Pradeep Panchakarla

Functional Safety Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A reliable solution that provides excellent features and detects memory corruption

The run time analysis process must be improved. If we do not run with the main loop, it generates its own main and doesn’t allow developers to modify the execution sequences. The solution must provide more flexibility to the developers to manipulate the runtime analysis tools. The developer must be allowed to modify the main sequence. It will be very easy for them to test their use cases. Otherwise, Polyspace generates a random main file and executes all the functions randomly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it is compatible with GitHub. The product's integration capabilities are sufficient for our small company of 35 people."

"It is very useful for reviews. We are using branch merging operations and full reset operations. It is also very useful for merging our code and tracking another branch. The graph diagrams of Git are very useful. Its interface is straightforward and not too complex for us."

"GitLab is being used as a repository for our codebase and it is a one stop DevOps tool we use in our team."

"The CI/CD process is very efficient."

"GitLab's source control is excellent."

"We like that we can create branches and then the branches can be reviewed and you can mesh those branches back. You can independently work with your own branch, you don't need to really control the core of other people."

"GitLab's best features are maintenance, branch integration, and development infrastructure."

"Continuous integration with deployment is very powerful, which is a significant reason for migrating from TFS to GitLab."

More GitLab pros

"When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts, and null pointer dereferences."

"The product detects memory corruptions."

"The outputs are very reliable."

"Polyspace Code Prover has made me realize it differs from other static code analysis tools because it runs the code. So it's quite distinct in that aspect."

"Polyspace Code Prover is a very user-friendly tool."

Cons

"For as long as I have used GitLab, I haven't encountered any major limitations. However, I think that perhaps the search functionality could be better."

"The solution does not have many built-in functions or variables so scripting is required."

"This solution could be improved by adding modifications such as slack notifications."

"Merge conflicts and repository maintenance could improve. If there is someone new to the system they would not know if there is a conflict."

"We'd always like to see better pricing on the product."

"GitLab's UI could be improved."

"I would like to see better integration with project management tools such as Jira."

"GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly."

More GitLab cons

"The tool has some stability issues."

"I'd like the data to be taken from any format."

"One of the main disadvantages is the time it takes to initiate the first run."

"Automation could be a challenge."

"Using Code Prover on large applications crashes sometimes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

"My company uses the free version of GitLab, which is GitLab Community Edition. There is a licensed version also available for GitLab."

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

"We are currently using the open-source version."

"We are using the open-source version."

"GitLab's pricing is good compared to others on the market."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"We use the paid version."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

38%

Computer Software Company

12%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Polyspace Code Prover?

When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Polyspace Code Prover?

We use the paid version.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polyspace Code Prover?

I'm still trying to use constraints with range propagation, but I can't get it to work properly, and I haven't found any documentation. It require support. There could be an issue with range propag...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Coverity vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 29% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 25% of the time

Klocwork vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 16% of the time

CodeSonar vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 9% of the time

Mend.io vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 2% of the time

More Polyspace Code Prover Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

June 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Polyspace Code Prover

May 2025

Download Polyspace Code Prover product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

No data available

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

Polyspace Code Prover is a sound static analysis tool that proves the absence of overflow, divide-by-zero, out-of-bounds array access, and certain other run-time errors in C and C++ source code. It produces results without requiring program execution, code instrumentation, or test cases. Polyspace Code Prover uses semantic analysis and abstract interpretation based on formal methods to verify software interprocedural, control, and data flow behavior. You can use it on handwritten code, generated code, or a combination of the two. Each operation is color-coded to indicate whether it is free of run-time errors, proven to fail, unreachable, or unproven.

MathWorks

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Alenia Aermacchi, CSEE Transport, Delphi Diesel Systems, EADS, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Korean Air, KOSTAL, Miracor, NASA Ames Research Center

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Polyspace Code Prover

June 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Polyspace Code Prover

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Polyspace Code Prover and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Polyspace Code Prover report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.