GitLab vs HackerOne comparison

GitLab and HackerOne are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while HackerOne is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.3. GitLab holds a 2.7% mindshare in AS, compared to HackerOne’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of HackerOne users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 85 GitLab reviews

3,135 Views
2,310 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

HackerOne

Read 5 HackerOne reviews

118 Views
85 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

GitLab

HackerOne

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

HackerOne and GitLab compete in cybersecurity and software development collaborations. GitLab has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and integration capabilities, although HackerOne offers strong pricing and support.

Features: HackerOne connects organizations with ethical hackers, enabling discovery of unknown vulnerabilities, and offers third-party integrations and fast result delivery. GitLab provides an integrated DevOps lifecycle tool, continuous integration/delivery, and detailed version control through branch management.

Room for Improvement: HackerOne could improve by expanding integration options and refining user interfaces for better program management. GitLab may benefit from enhanced documentation for beginners, deeper integration with external tools, and more intuitive user navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HackerOne is known for its straightforward deployment model and responsive customer support, while GitLab provides seamless workflow integration with robust documentation, making it easier for teams to adopt.

Pricing and ROI: HackerOne's lower setup costs provide effective ROI through early vulnerability detection. GitLab, despite higher initial expenses, delivers significant ROI by supporting a complete DevOps cycle with extensive functionalities that benefit development teams looking for a comprehensive solution.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. HackerOne Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. HackerOne

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

HackerOne

Ranking in Application Security Tools

29th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (40th), Bug Bounty Platforms (1st), Penetration Testing Services (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.7%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HackerOne is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Faizan Nehal

dApp Auditor at Hacken

Platform supports skill development with effective vulnerability reporting

Everything has become slower on HackerOne. I have noticed that older researchers receive all the private invites while newer ones receive fewer. The same goes for real-life events, where the same people are invited repeatedly. There are no clear guidelines for being invited to programs and conferences, and the process for receiving invitations appears arbitrary.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best thing is that as the developers work on separate tasks, all of the code goes there and the other team members don't have to wait on each other to finish."

"GitLab is scalable and works well with multiple environments."

"The code merging capability is something that we use very frequently."

"The important feature is the entire process of versioning source code maintenance and easy deployment. It is a necessity for the CI/CD pipeline."

"For us, Gitlab's most valuable feature is the integration with Cypress. We're using Cypress as an automation tool, so we're using GitLab as a tool for running in parallel."

"The solution's service delivery model is fantastic."

"It is user-friendly, easy to use, and easy to administer."

"The most valuable aspects of GitLab are the ability to create branches, merge branches, and compare branches to resolve code conflicts."

More GitLab pros

"It helps me to get new sales, profits, and other benefits."

"Apart from getting all the bug bounty opportunities, we also get the chance to practice in a safe environment, like a demo setup. These features are great for beginners who want to explore bug bounties in the future."

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

"The most valuable feature of HackerOne is its variety of programs. These programs provide depth into various areas, such as mobile, API, and websites."

Cons

"Even if I say I want some improvement, they will say it is already planned in the first quarter, second quarter, or third quarter. That said, most everything is quite improved already, and they're improving even further still."

"I have encountered issues with the deployment of CI/CD pipelines, especially dealing with variable environments."

"There are some challenges with repository file management as GitLab may struggle to manage larger files."

"GitLab would be improved with the addition of templates for deployment on local PCs."

"The solution could improve by providing more integration into the CI/CD pipeline, an autocomplete search tool, and more supporting documentation."

"GitLab's Windows version is yet not available and having this would be an improvement."

"It should be used by a larger number of people. They should raise awareness."

"This solution could be improved by adding modifications such as slack notifications."

More GitLab cons

"The ability to view the conversation between the triagers and the programs will be really good."

"Response time can be improved. The HackerOne Trust team can be slow to respond sometimes. They're not using AI, which could help reduce the number of duplicate reports."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne."

"One issue I've experienced is traffic. Many people try to participate when an opportunity with a bounty of around 1,000-15,000 dollars comes up. In this case, the first person to report the vulnerability gets the bounty. If a second person reports the same vulnerability, they are marked as duplicated instead of receiving some recognition. The second person also invested time finding the issue, so I think this can be improved."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne. I have noticed that older researchers receive all the private invites while newer ones receive fewer."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Regarding pricing, I would rate GitLab as moderately priced, maybe around a seven or eight out of ten. It could be more flexible for clients but generally offers good value."

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"This product is not very expensive but the price can be better."

"We are currently using the open-source version."

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"The open-source version is very good and the commercial version is reasonably priced."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"The tool is open-source and free for bug bounty hunters."

"The solution is free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

12%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HackerOne?

The cost is rated as one since there is no need to pay anything, not even a fee or commission.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HackerOne?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HackerOne?

My use case is similar to DuckTron. The processes I use for DuckTron are exactly the same for HackerOne. Therefore, there isn't much of a difference. I use HackerOne for finding vulnerabilities and...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 16% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 6% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Bugcrowd vs HackerOne

Compared 44% of the time

Intigriti vs HackerOne

Compared 17% of the time

Synack vs HackerOne

Compared 14% of the time

YesWeHack vs HackerOne

Compared 10% of the time

Cobalt vs HackerOne

Compared 4% of the time

More HackerOne Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

June 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne

June 2025

Download HackerOne product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

HackerOne becomes your partner who executes all aspects of your bug bounty program, including triage, bounty pricing, and hacker relations, allowing you to fully focus on fixing vulnerabilities.

HackerOne

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Zenefits, Adobe, Yelp

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. HackerOne

June 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. HackerOne

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. HackerOne and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. HackerOne report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.