GitHub CoPilot vs Pillir comparison

GitHub and Pillir are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. GitHub is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.1, while Pillir is ranked #44. GitHub holds a 6.0% mindshare in RADS, compared to Pillir’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pillir users who would recommend it.

GitHub CoPilot

Read 28 GitHub CoPilot reviews

2,771 Views
665 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Pillir

Read 2 Pillir reviews

143 Views
24 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

Pillir

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Pillir and GitHub CoPilot both focus on enhancing application development. GitHub CoPilot has the upper hand in advanced coding environments due to its real-time coding assistance and integration capabilities; however, Pillir offers lower development costs.

Features: Pillir enables rapid application deployment in both cloud and on-premise environments through its low-code platform, making it accessible for non-technical stakeholders. GitHub CoPilot stands out with AI-driven code suggestions, multi-language support, and AI-powered autocomplete, which greatly enhance developer productivity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub CoPilot integrates seamlessly with existing development setups and has extensive online resources, supported by a large developer community providing peer support. Pillir offers a cloud-centric deployment model that facilitates easy app integration.

Pricing and ROI: Pillir presents scalable pricing models that appeal to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions with moderate ROI. GitHub CoPilot uses a subscription-based model, potentially requiring a higher initial investment but delivering dynamic ROI by reducing coding time and enhancing productivity.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. Pillir Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. Pillir

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (1st)

Pillir

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

44th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Low-Code Development Platforms (46th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 6.0%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pillir is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at Yext Inc

Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration

In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.

Read full review

principl247992

Senior SAP Systems Architect at QAD

Intuitive and easy to use with almost no coding

The ability to analyze the business logic built over the years in ABAP and then convert it was pretty amazing. This is the first time I saw a solution that offers something like that. While obviously, it can't convert 100% of the logic (we had over 30,000 lines of code in this process alone), it did pretty well. Afterward, my team had to go in and complete the rest - using drag and drop - almost with no use of code. I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In terms of understanding user queries and providing code that aligns with my expectations, there is room for improvement."

"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."

"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."

"The solution's most valuable features are context awareness, multi language support, integration with popular IDs like Visual Studio Code or JetBrains, and reduced coding time."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its code suggestion capability, which leverages AI to provide context-aware suggestions."

"The platform's most valuable feature is detecting and suggesting variables based on the existing file context."

"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."

"Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs."

More GitHub CoPilot pros

"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."

"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."

Cons

"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."

"The only suggestion is to enhance Copilot's ability to assist developers with infrastructure as code tasks. Like, while using CI/CD pipeline, when I use YAML files, so it could just support the port number."

"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."

"If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load."

"Sometimes it requires multiple iterations to get the code I need, like for creating a login page with specific buttons and logic."

"It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"They could simplify the API integrations and allow us to automate certain tasks using our own server without just logging into the web page."

More GitHub CoPilot cons

"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."

"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."

"Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."

"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."

"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."

"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."

"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."

"The solution is costly."

More GitHub CoPilot pricing and cost advice

"It is straightforward consumption based on the number of end-users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

I honestly don't have a clue about how much we usually pay for GitHub CoPilot because the increase in license costs is managed by another team, and I am not the administrator, so I generally don't ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

The areas of GitHub CoPilot that need improvement include the ability to debug, which is applicable to AI-driven tools that allow you to code, and to understand our application better and learn fro...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 33% of the time

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 9% of the time

Claude vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot

June 2025

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

June 2025

Download Pillir product report

Also Known As

No data available

appsFreedom

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

Pillir is the developer of a low-code/no-code, cloud-native platform that enables organizations to develop mission-critical apps 20 times faster than traditional methods, leveraging the power of SAP’s digital core from any device, with or without connectivity. Pillir’s platform automatically converts legacy custom business processes to modern cloud-native applications, available on the web and via any mobile device. It enables organizations at any stage of their SAP journey to accelerate their digital transformation, enabling innovation at the edge while maintaining a clean SAP digital core.

Pillir

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Dole packaed food, Par Pacific, Brown Forman (Jack Daniels and other brands), Mobile Mini, Nabors

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. Pillir

June 2025

Free Report: GitHub CoPilot vs. Pillir

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. Pillir and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub CoPilot vs. Pillir report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.