GitHub CoPilot vs Pillir comparison

GitHub and Pillir are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. GitHub is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1, while Pillir is ranked #42. GitHub holds a 4.7% mindshare in RADS, compared to Pillir’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pillir users who would recommend it.

GitHub CoPilot

Read 31 GitHub CoPilot reviews

4,494 Views
2,921 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Pillir

Read 2 Pillir reviews

378 Views
249 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

Pillir

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Pillir and GitHub CoPilot both focus on enhancing application development. GitHub CoPilot has the upper hand in advanced coding environments due to its real-time coding assistance and integration capabilities; however, Pillir offers lower development costs.

Features: Pillir enables rapid application deployment in both cloud and on-premise environments through its low-code platform, making it accessible for non-technical stakeholders. GitHub CoPilot stands out with AI-driven code suggestions, multi-language support, and AI-powered autocomplete, which greatly enhance developer productivity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub CoPilot integrates seamlessly with existing development setups and has extensive online resources, supported by a large developer community providing peer support. Pillir offers a cloud-centric deployment model that facilitates easy app integration.

Pricing and ROI: Pillir presents scalable pricing models that appeal to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions with moderate ROI. GitHub CoPilot uses a subscription-based model, potentially requiring a higher initial investment but delivering dynamic ROI by reducing coding time and enhancing productivity.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. Pillir Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. Pillir

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (2nd)

Pillir

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

42nd

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Low-Code Development Platforms (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 4.7%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pillir is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot	4.7%
Pillir	0.5%
Other	94.8%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages

Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

Read full review

it_user130401

Application Developer Manager at a tech company with 10,001+ employees

Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model

I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment. We have people going through all of their shifts without connectivity, yet it automatically later synchronizes well with SAP, without creating extra documents or anything like that. The ability to take ABAP code and automatically convert it to a mobile app and then adjust it to our needs is something that I haven't seen in any other low-code solution on the market, and it has been life-changing for us. I love how easy it is to manage the design of the process using drag and drop. I know they are working to make the developer experience even better, and I'm very excited about it. The modernizer element that converts existing ABAP business logic to the cloud-native mobile-friendly solution is a very powerful tool that I haven't seen in the market.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable features are context awareness, multi language support, integration with popular IDs like Visual Studio Code or JetBrains, and reduced coding time."

"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."

"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."

"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."

"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."

"GitHub Copilot can improve productivity by up to 40%, especially for experienced developers. Senior developers often spend more time reviewing code, which can make the code review process a bit longer."

"In terms of understanding user queries and providing code that aligns with my expectations, there is room for improvement."

"GitHub Copilot code suggestion capabilities are always good."

More GitHub CoPilot pros

"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."

"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."

Cons

"Sometimes it requires multiple iterations to get the code I need, like for creating a login page with specific buttons and logic."

"There is a lot of hallucination happening in GitHub CoPilot sometimes; on one side, it provides production-grade environment code, but on the other side, it lacks understanding the context of what I tell it and hallucinates a lot."

"The problem arises when a bot is not well-designed, which frustrates customers."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention."

"While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections."

"There are no extensions provided by the product for Eclipse."

"If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load."

More GitHub CoPilot cons

"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."

"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."

"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."

"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."

"GitHub Copilot is a paid service, costing approximately $6 per month. There might be a free trial available."

"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."

"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."

"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."

"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."

More GitHub CoPilot pricing and cost advice

"It is straightforward consumption based on the number of end-users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

For now, I think it is okay. It is not that expensive. The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 19% of the time

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Claude for Enterprise vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Mendix vs Pillir

Compared 36% of the time

WorkflowGen vs Pillir

Compared 33% of the time

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs Pillir

Compared 31% of the time

More Pillir Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot

January 2026

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

January 2026

Download Pillir product report

Also Known As

No data available

appsFreedom

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

Pillir is the developer of a low-code/no-code, cloud-native platform that enables organizations to develop mission-critical apps 20 times faster than traditional methods, leveraging the power of SAP’s digital core from any device, with or without connectivity. Pillir’s platform automatically converts legacy custom business processes to modern cloud-native applications, available on the web and via any mobile device. It enables organizations at any stage of their SAP journey to accelerate their digital transformation, enabling innovation at the edge while maintaining a clean SAP digital core.

Pillir

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Dole packaed food, Par Pacific, Brown Forman (Jack Daniels and other brands), Mobile Mini, Nabors

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. Pillir

December 2025

Free Report: GitHub CoPilot vs. Pillir

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. Pillir and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub CoPilot vs. Pillir report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.