GitGuardian Platform vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform comparison

GitGuardian Platform vs. Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Download the complete report

Helped 865,985 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (8th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (6th), Software Supply Chain Security (4th), DevSecOps (3rd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (4th)

Tenable One Exposure Manage...

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is 1.3%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitGuardian Platform	0.5%
Tenable One Exposure Management Platform	1.3%
Other	98.2%

Threat Intelligence Platforms

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

Yusuf_Hashmi

Chief Information Security Officer at Jubil

Good discovery and vulnerability features and is easy to use

I think it's a good product for risk-based or exposure-based vulnerability management. It gives me the ability to identify potential weaknesses in my environment quickly. Once those vulnerabilities get identified on the console, it is only a matter of performing those actions. I would rate it nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GitGuardian has also helped us develop a security-minded culture. We're serious about shift left and getting better about code security. I think a lot of people are getting more mindful about what a secret is."

"GitGuardian has pretty broad detection capabilities. It covers all of the types of secrets that we've been interested in... [Yet] The "detector" concept, which identifies particular categories or types of secrets, allows an organization to tweak and tailor the configuration for things that are specific to its environment. This is highly useful if you're particularly worried about a certain type of secret and it can help focus attention, as part of early remediation efforts."

"The secrets detection and alerting is the most important feature. We get alerted almost immediately after someone commits a secret. It has been very accurate, allowing us to jump on it right away, then figure out if we have something substantial that has been leaked or whether it is something that we don't have to worry about. This general main feature of the app is great."

"I like that GitGuardian automatically notifies the developer who committed the change. The security team doesn't need to act as the intermediary and tell the developer there is an alert. The alert goes directly to the developer."

"My impression of the GitGuardian Platform's capability to detect secrets in real time has been really amazing, because it lets us protect or block the pipelines in which we deploy new applications so we can acknowledge when a secret is hardcoded in a repository, or when we have already hardcoded secrets within templates in our repos."

"What is particularly helpful is that having GitGuardian show that the code failed a check enables us to automatically pass the resolution to the author. We don't have to rely on the reviewer to assign it back to him or her. Letting the authors solve their own problems before they get to the reviewer has significantly improved visibility and reduced the remediation time from multiple days to minutes or hours. Given how time-consuming code reviews can be, it saves some of our more scarce resources."

"The newest addition that we appreciate about GitGuardian Platform is the ability to create a custom detector, which we built and worked with the team, and that works very effectively."

"You can also assign tasks to specific teams or people to complete, such as assigning something to the "blue team" or saying that this person needs to do this, and that person needs to do that. That is a great feature because you can actually manage your team internally in GitGuardian."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"The product gives us a lot of insight."

"I think it's a good product for risk-based or exposure-based vulnerability management."

"For me, the setup has been an easy process."

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"The feature of vulnerability management and discovery is what I use."

Cons

"We'd like to request a new GitGuardian feature that automates user onboarding and access control for code repositories."

"There has been a little bit of downtime of late, and it has been reasonably impactful when it's not been scanning."

"I would like to see more fine-grained access controls when tickets are assigned for incidents. I would like the ability to provide more controls to the team leads or the product managers so that they can drive what we, the AppSec team, are doing."

"GitGuardian could have more detailed information on what software engineers can do. It only provides some highly generic feedback when a secret is detected. They should have outside documentation. We send this to our software engineers, who are still doing the commits. It's the wrong way to work, but they are accustomed to doing it this way. When they go into that ticket, they see a few instructions that might be confusing. If I see a leaked secret committed two years ago, it's not enough to undo that commit. I need to go in there, change all my code to utilize GitHub secrets, and go on AWS to validate my key."

"There is room for improvement in GitGuardian on Azure DevOps. The implementation is a bit hard there. This is one of the things we requested help with. I would not say their support is not good, but they need them to improve in helping customers on that side."

"One of our current challenges is that the GitGuardian platform identifies encrypted secrets and statements as sensitive information even though they're secured."

"I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems like a compelling approach to lure and identify attackers."

"Other solutions have a live chat feature that provides instant results. Waiting for an agent to reply to an email is less ideal than an instant conversation with a support employee. That's a complaint so minor I almost hesitate to mention it."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"Tenable needs to provide a better way to manage private clouds."

"The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports."

"The sensor update is a challenge that Tenable needs to address. Sometimes they behave abruptly, requiring me to rework reinstalling the sensors on the endpoints."

"It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies."

"The sensor update is a challenge that Tenable needs to address."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool."

"We don't have a huge number of users, but its yearly rate was quite reasonable when compared to other per-seat solutions that we looked at... Having a free plan for a small number of users was really great. If you're a small team, I don't see why you wouldn't want to get started with it."

"I am only aware of the base price. I do not know what happened with our purchasing team in discussions with GitGuardian. I was not privy to the overall contract, but in terms of the base MSRP price, I found it reasonable."

"The pricing for GitGuardian is fair."

"It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are very happy with the value we get."

"I compared the solution to a couple of other solutions, and I think it is very competitively priced."

"The pricing is reasonable. GitGuardian is one of the most recent security tools we've adopted. When it came time to renew it, there was no doubt about it. It is licensed per developer, so it scales nicely with the number of repos that we have. We can create new repositories and break up work. It isn't scaling based on the amount of data it's consuming."

"It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,985 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

19%

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable.ep?

The setup cost is reasonable.

What needs improvement with Tenable.ep?

There is not much room for improvement. However, the sensor update is a challenge that Tenable needs to address. Sometimes they behave abruptly, requiring me to rework reinstalling the sensors on t...

What is your primary use case for Tenable.ep?

I use this solution for vulnerability management for the infrastructure, one cloud security, CSPM, and application dynamic testing.

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitGuardian Platform

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 14% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 12% of the time

SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 9% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 26% of the time

Picus Security vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 16% of the time

XM Cyber vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Cymulate vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 9% of the time

CyCognito vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

GitGuardian Platform

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

Download Tenable One Exposure Management Platform product report

Tenable One Exposure Management Platform report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring

Tenable.ep

Overview

GitGuardian is an advanced secrets security platform that strengthens Non-Human Identity security and ensures compliance with industry standards by detecting and managing secrets in development environments.

GitGuardian integrates Secrets Security and Secrets Observability, facilitating the detection of compromised secrets and managing legitimate secrets' lifecycle. Supporting over 450 types of secrets, the platform offers public monitoring for leaked data and employs honeytokens as an added defense. Trusted by over 600,000 developers, organizations such as Snowflake and ING rely on GitGuardian for robust secrets protection.

What features define GitGuardian?

Internal Monitoring: Tracks confidential data like IDs and tokens.
Dev in the Loop: Rapid alerts for leaks.
Detection Capabilities: High accuracy with a low false-positive rate.
Integrations: Supports seamless integration with multiple platforms.
Customized Detectors: Offers tailored security solutions.
Multi-Vault Support: Facilitates efficient issue management.

What are the key benefits when evaluating GitGuardian?

Comprehensive Detection: Identifies AWS keys and other hardcoded secrets.
Efficient Remediation: Swiftly resolves issues.
Improved Security: Prevents accidental leaks of sensitive data.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps.

In sectors like healthcare and telecommunications, GitGuardian is implemented for detecting and managing the exposure of sensitive information in code repositories. Teams benefit from its ability to integrate with platforms such as GitHub, allowing for immediate alerts and efficient remediation of security risks, enhancing application security by safeguarding operational environments.

GitGuardian

You can now translate technical asset, vulnerability and threat data into clear business insights and actionable intelligence for security executives. Combine broad exposure coverage spanning IT assets, cloud resources, containers, web apps and identity platforms, with threat intelligence and data science from Tenable Research. Focus efforts to prevent likely attacks and accurately communicate cyber risk to support optimal business performance.

Tenable One is an exposure management platform that combines risk-based vulnerability management, web application security, cloud security and identity security.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.

Information Not Available

GitGuardian Platform vs. Tenable One Exposure Management Platform