GitGuardian Platform vs ReversingLabs comparison

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

1,660 Views
349 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitGuardian Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

ReversingLabs and GitGuardian Platform are active in the cybersecurity sector. While customers appreciate the affordability and customer support of ReversingLabs, GitGuardian Platform is often preferred for its comprehensive features that justify its costs.

Features: ReversingLabs provides threat intelligence, advanced malware analysis, and a vast malware repository. GitGuardian Platform focuses on detecting secrets in code, version control monitoring, and seamless alerts for developers.

Room for Improvement: ReversingLabs could benefit from better integration ease and reduced complexity in setup. Expanding its support documentation would also be helpful. GitGuardian Platform could improve by minimizing its false-positive rate, enhancing support for additional programming languages, and providing more granular incident management options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitGuardian Platform is praised for smooth integration with CI/CD pipelines and robust API support. Its proactive support model simplifies deployment processes. ReversingLabs provides effective support but is considered to have a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: ReversingLabs is enjoyed for its competitive pricing, offering value with lower setup costs and rapid ROI. GitGuardian Platform, while more expensive, is valued for addressing modern code security challenges, considered worth the investment by many for its specialized features.

To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. ReversingLabs Report (Updated: October 2025).

GitGuardian Platform vs. ReversingLabs

Download the complete report

Helped 872,846 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

5th

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (6th), DevSecOps (3rd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (3rd)

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Application Security Tools

41st

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

33rd

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

19th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (43rd), Container Security (48th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitGuardian Platform	0.9%
ReversingLabs	0.4%
Other	98.7%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

Jesse Harris

Principal Solutions Architect at Tanium

Comes with a large sample size and helps t stay on top of emerging threats

The solution helps to stay on top of emerging threats with easy integration with other products. ReversingLabs has a large sample size. The solution needs to improve integrations. I have been using the solution for four to five years. ReversingLabs' stability is excellent. I rate the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The breadth of the solution detection capabilities is pretty good. They have good categories and a lot of different types of secrets... it gives us a great range when it comes to types of secrets, and that's good for us."

"I like GitGuardian's instant response. When you have an incident, it's reported immediately. The interface gives you a great overview of your current leaked secrets."

"It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smaller company and have never changed in size, but we got to the point where we felt the service brought us value, and we want to pay for it. We also wanted an SLA for technical support and whatnot, so we switched to a paid plan. Without that, they had a super-generous, free tier, and I was immensely impressed with it."

"The entire GitGuardian solution is valuable. The product is doing its job and showing us many things. We get many false positives, but the ability to automatically display potential leaks when developers commit is valuable. The dashboards show you recent and historical commits, and we have a full scan that shows historical leaked secrets."

"Presently, we find the pre-commit hooks more useful."

"My impression of the GitGuardian Platform's capability to detect secrets in real time has been really amazing, because it lets us protect or block the pipelines in which we deploy new applications so we can acknowledge when a secret is hardcoded in a repository, or when we have already hardcoded secrets within templates in our repos."

"I like that GitGuardian automatically notifies the developer who committed the change. The security team doesn't need to act as the intermediary and tell the developer there is an alert. The alert goes directly to the developer."

"The most valuable feature of GitGuardian is that it finds tokens and passwords. That's why we need this tool. It minimizes the possibility of security violations that we cannot find on our own."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

Cons

"GitGuardian could have more detailed information on what software engineers can do. It only provides some highly generic feedback when a secret is detected. They should have outside documentation. We send this to our software engineers, who are still doing the commits. It's the wrong way to work, but they are accustomed to doing it this way. When they go into that ticket, they see a few instructions that might be confusing. If I see a leaked secret committed two years ago, it's not enough to undo that commit. I need to go in there, change all my code to utilize GitHub secrets, and go on AWS to validate my key."

"For some repositories, there are a lot of incidents. For example, one repository says 255 occurrences, so I assume these are 255 alerts and nobody is doing anything about them. These could be false positives. However, I cannot assess it correctly, because I haven't been closing these false positives myself. From the dashboard, I can see that for some of the repositories, there have been a lot of closing of these occurrences, so I would assume there are a lot of false positives. A ballpark estimate would be 60% being false positives. One of the arguments from the developers against this tool is the number of false positives."

"There is room for improvement in its integration for bug-tracking. It should be more direct. They have invested a lot in user management, but they need to invest in integrations. That is a real lack."

"I would like to see improvement in some of the user interface features... When one secret is leaked in multiple files or multiple repositories, it will appear on the dashboard. But when you click on that secret, all the occurrences will appear on the page. It would be better to have one secret per occurrence, directly, so that we don't have to click to get to the list of all the occurrences."

"GitGuardian's hook and dashboard scanners are the two entities. They should work together as one. We've seen several discrepancies where the hook is not being flagged on the dashboard. I still think they need to do some fine-tuning around that. We don't want to waste time."

"The purchasing process is convoluted compared to Snyk, the other tool we use. It's like night and day because you only need to punch in your credit card, and you're set. With GitGuardian, getting a quote took two or three weeks. We paid for it in December but have not settled that payment yet."

"The main disadvantage I feel they should improve upon is that apart from flagging credential issues or secrets, they could incorporate something else to make it more dynamic."

"The documentation could be improved because when we started working with GitGuardian, it was difficult to find specific use cases."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We don't have a huge number of users, but its yearly rate was quite reasonable when compared to other per-seat solutions that we looked at... Having a free plan for a small number of users was really great. If you're a small team, I don't see why you wouldn't want to get started with it."

"GitGuardian is on the pricier side."

"It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool."

"It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are very happy with the value we get."

"The pricing and licensing are fair. It isn't very expensive and it's good value."

"I compared the solution to a couple of other solutions, and I think it is very competitively priced."

"It's a little bit expensive."

"With GitGuardian, we didn't need any middlemen."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

19%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 15% of the time

SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 10% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 21% of the time

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 11% of the time

IBM X-Force Exchange vs ReversingLabs

Compared 9% of the time

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs ReversingLabs

Compared 9% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs ReversingLabs

Compared 8% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

Product Reports

GitGuardian Platform

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

Download ReversingLabs product report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Overview

GitGuardian is a comprehensive platform focused on enhancing Non-Human Identity security by integrating Secrets Security and Secrets Observability to detect and manage secrets across development environments.

As cybersecurity threats increasingly target NHIs like service accounts and applications, GitGuardian offers a robust solution by supporting over 450 types of secrets and deploying honeytokens for additional defense. Trusted by leading organizations and developers, its monitoring and quick alert system enable effective detection and management of sensitive data, strengthening operational security across platforms.

What are the key features of GitGuardian?

Secrets Detection: Identifies various secrets types such as AWS keys and passwords.
Quick Alerts: Provides timely notifications for immediate risk management.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development tools and workflows.
Dev in the Loop: Facilitates rapid issue resolution.
Historical Scanning: Enhances security through thorough scanning practices.

What benefits and ROI should companies consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined remediation processes with minimal false positives.
Customizability: Adaptable detection features cater to specific needs.
Risk Reduction: Proactive management of sensitive data threats.
Team Integration: Improved collaboration through connected workflows.
Development Continuity: Maintains seamless operation during security processes.

In the tech industry, GitGuardian is employed to safeguard APIs and sensitive credentials across code repositories like GitHub. Companies benefit from instant alerts and integrations with tools like Slack, effectively managing risks and enhancing security policies. While popular in sectors dependent on development agility, there is room for further improvement in customization and integration to meet specific industry needs.

GitGuardian

ReversingLabs is the trusted authority in software and file security. We provide the modern cybersecurity platform to verify and deliver safe binaries. Trusted by the Fortune 500 and leading cybersecurity vendors, the ReversingLabs Titanium Platform® powers the software supply chain and file security insights, tracking over 35 billion files daily with the ability to deconstruct full software binaries in seconds to minutes. Only ReversingLabs provides that final exam to determine whether a single file or full software binary presents a risk to your organization and your customers.

RL - Trust Delivered.

https://www.reversinglabs.com

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology

GitGuardian Platform vs. ReversingLabs