We performed a comparison between G-Core Labs CDN and Imperva DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CDN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The CDN interface is intuitive and user-friendly, and there are no intrusive ads or upselling additional services. Everything is self-contained, and it's a convenient CDN overall. We also loved that they provided a free trial period. They always seem to do what's best for the consumer and the internet."
"Uptime is always perfect."
"The support is amazing! They solve the issues on the fly."
"Since transitioning to G-Core, our site has started working much faster, and freezes have stopped. Users are staying on the site longer and visiting more sections. We increased the number of customers by 30 percent in the past six months. This is partially attributable to G-Core services."
"There is no need to have an appliance in house for the services because it is on the cloud."
"The setup of Imperva DDoS was easy."
"Integration with IBM AS/400 and Db2 is okay."
"On the site security, I can see which countries have incidents, whether it was a robot attack, a real human user, or non-human user."
"Setup was straightforward, very simple. I only entered the domain and Incapsula returned the DNS data that I needed to change for the protection to be configured."
"Technical support provides good, quick responses."
"Real-time monitoring is also a great tool, as you may watch several parameters in real time."
"Scalability is pretty easy on the base platform. You just add another, and you're ready to go."
"It would be great if there were a section on the provider's website that shows a set of services for a particular business. It would be helpful to have some kind of checklist of services that are suitable for your blog, which are required, and which can be set up later."
"Once in the past six months, we got a "site is unavailable" error for a maximum of 20 minutes."
"I would like to have one optimized report that we could use for our own needs."
"There are some nuances in the tariff configurations that we found confusing. We would like more flexibility in this area."
"Imperva now offers add-ons to add functionality, but I would like to see these included in the product, even if it would cost more."
"It needs to be improved every time there are new attacks."
"Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa."
"The rules surrounding the making of web applications could be improved."
"I would like to have support for SSL management and secure DNS."
"I would like to see automated reporting to improve visibility."
"The solution needs to improve Integration with third parties for their on-prem deployment models. The integration is not that good yet."
"Analytics in the area of risk need to be improved to supply more information to the users for creating better environments."
G-Core Labs CDN is ranked 9th in CDN with 4 reviews while Imperva DDoS is ranked 5th in CDN with 74 reviews. G-Core Labs CDN is rated 9.2, while Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of G-Core Labs CDN writes "Works without interruption, scales well, and has perfect uptime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". G-Core Labs CDN is most compared with Cloudflare, Cloudflare DNS and Amazon CloudFront, whereas Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF. See our G-Core Labs CDN vs. Imperva DDoS report.
See our list of best CDN vendors.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.