• Home
  • Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs. PowerEdge C

Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs PowerEdge C comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fujitsu Logo

Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series

169 views|139 comparisons
Dell Technologies Logo

PowerEdge C

Read 23 PowerEdge C reviews
181 views|131 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series and PowerEdge C based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series?
Ali Asaad
Helps in generating green data centres and requires less cooling and maintenance
We have realised that instead of purchasing multiple servers with fewer cores, opting for higher series with more cores is a viable option that has... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "PowerEdge C is very expensive, but personally, I think it's worth the price."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "When we talk about pricing it is the cheapest on the market that I have found."
  • "The cost depends on the configuration."
  • "We buy licenses for the solution's advanced features."
  • "Despite the slightly higher price, we prefer Dell due to the high quality of their products."
  • "PowerEdge C is a reasonably priced product, and the pricing depends on how many years you need the product. The cost also includes the support."
  • "The licensing cost of PowerEdge C is very high."

    • More PowerEdge C Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about PowerEdge C?
    Top Answer:With the tool, we can easily upgrade and ensure compatibility between operating systems, hardwares and drivers. Among other features, the hardware also stands out because it is certified and aligns… more »
    Read all 16 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PowerEdge C?
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a 4 out of 10.
    Read all 14 answers   →
    What needs improvement with PowerEdge C?
    Top Answer:There has been an increase in quality issues.
    Read all 15 answers   →
    Ranking
    14th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    169
    Comparisons
    139
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    5th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    181
    Comparisons
    131
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    340
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Primergy BX900 Series
    Learn More
    Fujitsu
    Dell Technologies
    Overview

    The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX900 S2 chassis is the rock-solid foundation for Fujitsu's blade ecosystem, providing a reliable, flexible and efficient platform for building a converged infrastructure. The system provides a modular approach to create an IT infrastructure. The chassis includes all needed infrastructure elements such as power supplies and fans, networking, and management. The Fujitsu blade server is easy to upgrade, maintain and customize. Inside, you can mix and match almost any combination of server storage and connection blades to run your choice of operation systems and applications.

    PowerEdge C help you to maximize hyperscale performance with up to 4 independent server nodes, flexible storage and shared infrastructure in a compact 2U chassis.

    Sample Customers
    Yokogawa Electric Corporation, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International(ATR), Yamagata University, Universiti Putra Malaysia, China Telecom, Badan Informasi Geospasial
    NxtGen Datacenter, Medien-Service Untermain (MSU), Exasol, IndigoVision, Dayco
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Insurance Company18%
    Construction Company18%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Wholesaler/Distributor9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is ranked 14th in Blade Servers while PowerEdge C is ranked 5th in Blade Servers with 23 reviews. Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is rated 0.0, while PowerEdge C is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of PowerEdge C writes "Easy to deploy and has high performance and no downtime". Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is most compared with Dell PowerEdge M, whereas PowerEdge C is most compared with Huawei FusionServer X Series, HPE Apollo, Dell PowerEdge M and Cisco UCS B-Series.

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.