Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) vs Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FortiGate Next Generation F...
Ranking in ZTNA
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (10th), Unified Threat Management (UTM) (8th)
Google Cloud Platform Cloud...
Ranking in ZTNA
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the ZTNA category, the mindshare of FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) is 5.0%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is 2.4%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
ZTNA
 

Featured Reviews

Juan Solano - PeerSpot reviewer
Implementation improves efficiency and provides greater visibility over issues
One of the most valuable features of FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) ( /products/fortigate-next-generation-firewall-ngfw-reviews ) is the ease of usability it offers. It is quite easy for me to learn to use. Additionally, FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) has improved our efficiency in setting up security and provided us with more visibility over some issues and incidents we previously faced.
Kodanda Ramji C.S - PeerSpot reviewer
Involves an initial setup phase that is straightforward in nature
My company evaluates whether the product is capable of fulfilling the requirements of our customers, and we may even do it with the other OEM tools in the market. Based on the use cases given to my company by its customers, we evaluate whether Azure, AWS, or GCP can be helpful. Among the three cloud options, the ones that are able to fulfill our company's customers' requirements will be evaluated, and their report will be submitted to the manager. Based on the costing part, customers can decide which OEM tool would be the best for them. My company does technical and financial evaluation of the products. As there were no operational changes and only initial implementation was required, which was a part of the PoC phase, there wasn't much of an impact on the user experience. All the three service providers, like GCP, Azure and AWS are used to meet the same requirements. I would say that the same benefits are made available to users by all the service providers. The differentiation part can be considered only on the basis of the costs. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The IPS and the application control feature are the most valuable."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Routing and reporting are two areas where the product has an added advantage compared to any other product."
"Fortinet offers comprehensive security solutions for various purposes."
"One of the most valuable features of FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) is the ease of usability it offers."
"The common valuable feature for FortiGate is its UTM functionality, which includes various features under a license that is commonly implemented."
"FortiGate Next Generation Firewall has IBS/IPS systems"
"FortiGate Next Generation Firewall is a good solution because it has a range of options and a clear ecosystem."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Scalability-wise, it is an easy solution to scale up. I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten."
"The solution is easy to install and use."
"It is easy to integrate, especially if I consider the fact that it gives me a single dashboard where I have all the applications or apps displayed."
"UI representation is the aspect I like the most about GCP, even more than Azure or AWS."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I find the GCS Portal to be particularly valuable. It is more user-friendly and easier to navigate compared to other cloud providers, such as AWS. I particularly appreciate the user interface of GCS."
"The solution can be used for building the infrastructure on the cloud."
 

Cons

"The solution's stability should be improved because it is extremely unstable."
"The licensing model and pricing need improvement."
"I see room to explore its integration with Secure Service Automation for a more comprehensive security view."
"There is an area for improvement in vulnerability management."
"There have been several vulnerabilities in the firewall. It is hackable, some of the images are hackable."
"The vendors offer models with different levels of productivity of the product to its users, which is not possible in FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW). It lacks integration options."
"FortiGate NGFW can improve technical support. The engineer who answers the technical support call, email, or phone call, whatever the medium may be. The response time is very bad."
"One of the weaknesses of the solution is something we noticed, especially after comparing the tool with SD-WAN features, since, unfortunately, in a massive scale size environment, the solution is not good. I"
"The product’s user interface must be more user-friendly and detailed."
"Sometimes we face uncertainty when our internet connection gets disconnected. It becomes challenging to determine whether it's an issue with our internet or if the GCP has crashed."
"As an individual developer, I would like Google Cloud IAP to offer more flexibility, especially for smaller-scale usage."
"People who don't have experience in IT may find the tool challenging. It needs to improve its pricing."
"The hard part is creating the pack because our applications are in Azure Data Proxy, Data Fabric, and Data Factory. Our team used these tools in Azure, but in the future, they will transition to GCP."
"The stability regarding voice commands in the solution has certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"I think that the solution needs to be made available in a local region of every country, especially in countries like Taiwan."
"The UI of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive solution."
"I'll rate FortiGate's pricing a five out of ten since it is moderately priced."
"In my opinion, the pricing of the product is reasonable."
"The pricing is better compared to other solutions like Check Point, Arista, or Cisco."
"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten"
"We pay $500 per year for the license."
"The product is not very expensive."
"FortiGate Next Generation Firewall is an expensive solution."
"The solution is inexpensive for personal use."
"There are some costs attached to the licensing part of Google Cloud Platform, but it does not pose a challenge."
"The product is free."
"Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is quite an expensive solution."
"The monthly payments made towards the licensing cost of the solution are not expensive."
"There is a need to make yearly payments toward the solution's licensing."
"The product's costing model needs improvement."
"I think the price of Google Cloud Platform is reasonable. However, Microsoft is the most cost-effective solution for us because of Azure's integration. And we already have licenses for Windows Server and the databases, so the price is attractive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW)?
The tool's most valuable feature is IPS. In my experience, I haven't encountered any issues with integration. It easily integrates with the FortiGate solution. However, verifying through documentat...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW)?
From a cost perspective, I think it's quite reasonable, not so cheap, but I think it's quite similar compared to others.
What needs improvement with FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW)?
In FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW), my concern regarding improvements is the licensing model. In the latest versions, everything moves to licensing only, and to work from SSL VPNs and int...
What do you like most about Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy?
I can access the information whenever I want. It's integration is easy. The tool's GUI is easy to use with an IT background. The value benefits of using it include the ability to avoid storing data...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy?
There are different pricing plans depending on data volumes and services, but it's comparable to other providers. The value and benefits depend on what we're developing and the specific use case.
What needs improvement with Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy?
Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy should improve stability.
 

Also Known As

No data available
GCP Cloud IAP, Google Cloud Platform Cloud IAP, Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) vs. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.