Fortify Software Security Center vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

OpenText and Spirent are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. OpenText is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0, while Spirent is ranked #29. OpenText holds a 0.4% mindshare in SAST, compared to Spirent’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.

Fortify Software Security C...

Read 7 Fortify Software Security Center reviews

576 Views
513 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood reviews

681 Views
572 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortify Software Security C...

Spirent CyberFlood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Fortify Software Security Center and Spirent CyberFlood cater to software security and cyber testing. Spirent CyberFlood stands out due to its comprehensive features, despite Fortify leading in pricing satisfaction.

Features: Fortify Software Security Center is known for efficient code analysis, seamless integration, and enhanced security management. Spirent CyberFlood offers detailed testing capabilities, flexible test scenarios, and diverse advanced testing solutions.

Room for Improvement: Fortify Software Security Center requires better reporting capabilities, user-friendly interfaces, and responsive technical support. Spirent CyberFlood can improve its automation features, update processes, and integration flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify Software Security Center adapts well to enterprise environments but needs streamlined deployment. Spirent CyberFlood has straightforward setup and strong customer service, focusing on user-friendly deployment and support.

Pricing and ROI: Fortify Software Security Center users are satisfied with its pricing structure and note a positive ROI. Spirent CyberFlood is more expensive but delivers substantial ROI due to its advanced features, justifying the price for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Software Security Center vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Software Security Center vs. Spirent CyberFlood

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Software Security C...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

28th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spirent CyberFlood

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

29th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (32nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Fortify Software Security Center is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Steyn

Principal Technical Consultant at EOH

Comprehensive vulnerability analysis and customization features with decent pricing

Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances. WebInspect supports a number of APIs and web endpoints. I find its feature of macro recording allows for testing vulnerabilities during multi-factor authentication sessions very valuable. I appreciate the ability to further analyze data with tools like Audit Workbench.

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."

"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have."

"Fortify Analytics' AI function helps scan and provides more detailed explanations and recommendations about vulnerabilities."

"The overall rating for this tool is ten out of ten."

"I like the explanation of issues provided by Fortify Software Security Center."

"This is a stable solution at the end of the day."

"Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

Cons

"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."

"The product's overlap feature is restrictive and requires more customization efforts, which can be expensive."

"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful."

"We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."

"I am not satisfied with the percentage of false positives, which is around eighteen percent."

"This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available."

"The solution is priced fair."

"This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Software Security Center?

In the beginning, it was difficult for me to verify that our usage of Fortify Software Security Center corresponded to the license and criteria. Now, we have negotiated a number of details to respe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Software Security Center?

I would like the false positive issue to diminish. I have experienced a lot of false positives, but I think this is due to using an older version. I hope the new version will resolve my problem.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Software Security Center?

They use it to scan applications and fix bugs, which are my customers' main use cases for Fortify Software Security Center. As a reseller, I sell this product to provide application security becaus...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Spirent CyberFlood?

The language barrier and time difference pose significant issues with customer support. The price is competitive. The biggest benefits I find are test assurance, the reliability of the test results...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Core Application Security vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 49% of the time

Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 38% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 13% of the time

More Fortify Software Security Center Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 61% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 25% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 14% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

August 2025

Download Fortify Software Security Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

July 2025

Download Spirent CyberFlood product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.

OpenText

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Spirent

Sample Customers

Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Software Security Center vs. Spirent CyberFlood

July 2025

Free Report: Fortify Software Security Center vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Software Security Center vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortify Software Security Center vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.