Fortify on Demand vs Snyk comparison

Read 47 Snyk reviews

10,536 Views
6,368 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortify on Demand

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 4, 2025

Fortify on Demand and Snyk compete in the application security solutions category. Snyk appears to have the advantage, particularly due to its ease of cloud deployment and developer-friendly integrations, which align with current trends towards cloud-based operations.

Features: Fortify on Demand provides detailed vulnerability tracking and offers expert-reviewed results, ensuring an extensive security analysis. It supports various application formats, helping users meet different compliance standards. Snyk provides comprehensive vulnerability detection across numerous code dependencies and easy integrations with cloud tools, catering to developers looking for straightforward security insights.

Room for Improvement: Fortify on Demand could enhance its reporting capabilities and support for newer technologies alongside faster processing times. It also struggles with false positives and improved user-friendliness. Snyk could benefit from broader language support, improved IDE integrations, and more refined alert systems. Users note a need for enhanced reporting and reduced alert noise.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify on Demand is adaptable to on-premise, cloud, and hybrid environments, though it might lag in adopting new technologies. Customer support feedback varies, with experiences ranging from prompt support to delays. Snyk is praised for cloud deployment ease and its public cloud service integrations. Its customer service is generally favorable, though some areas require more technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Fortify on Demand is considered expensive, driven by its extensive features which appeal to those needing in-depth security. Its subscription model is flexible. Snyk is seen as more affordable with its features offering a comprehensive toolset, although premium integrations add costs. Both provide significant ROI by reducing security risks and improving operational efficiency, yet appeal to differing market segments.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify on Demand vs. Snyk Report (Updated: June 2025).

Fortify on Demand vs. Snyk

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify on Demand

Ranking in Application Security Tools

14th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Snyk

Ranking in Application Security Tools

5th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (16th), Container Security (5th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Fortify on Demand is 4.3%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 7.7%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Steyn

Principal Technical Consultant at EOH

Source code analyzer, FPR file generation, reduction of false positives and generates compliance reports, for in-depth analysis

Not challenges with the product itself. The product is very reliable. It does have a steep learning curve. But, again, one thing that Fortify or OpenText does very well is training. There are a lot of free resources and training in the community forums, free training as well as commercial training where users can train on how to use the back-end systems and the scanning engines and how to use command-line arguments because some of the procedures or some of the tools do require a bit of a learning curve. That's the only challenge I've really seen for customers because you have to learn how to use the tool effectively. But Fortify has, in fact, improved its user interface and the way users engage the dashboards and the interfaces. It is intuitive. It's easy to understand. But in some regards, the cybersecurity specialist or AppSec would need a bit of training to engage the user interface and to understand how it functions. But from the point of the reliability index and how powerful the tool is, there's no challenge there. But it's just from a learning perspective; users might need a bit more skill to use the tool. The user interface isn't that tedious. It's not that difficult to understand. When I initially learned how to use the interfaces, I was able to master it within a week and was able to use it quite effectively. So training is required. All skills are needed to learn how to use the tool. I would like to see more enhancements in the dashboards. Dashboards are available. They do need some configuration and settings. But I would like to see more business intelligence capabilities within the tool. It's not particularly a cybersecurity function, but, for instance, business impact analysis or other features where you can actually use business intelligence capabilities within your security tool. That would be remarkable because not only do you have a cybersecurity tool, but you also have a tool that can give you business impact analysis and some other measurements. A bit more intelligence in terms of that from a cybersecurity perspective would be remarkable.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles

The most important feature of Snyk is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions such as Check Point. It is easy to consolidate Snyk across multiple entities within a large organization. Additionally, our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the server, scanning, and it has helped identify issues with the security analysis."

"One of the top features is the source code review for vulnerabilities. When we look at source code, it's hard to see where areas may be weak in terms of security, and Fortify on Demand's source code review helps with that."

"The most valuable features are the detailed reporting and the ability to set up deep scanning of the software, both of which are in the same place."

"The solution saves us a lot of money. We're trying to reduce exposure and costs related to remediation."

"The solution scans our code and provides us with a dashboard of all the vulnerabilities and the criticality of the vulnerabilities. It is very useful that they provide right then and there all the information about the vulnerability, including possible fixes, as well as some additional documentation and links to the authoritative sources of why this is an issue and what's the correct way to deal with it."

"What stands out to me is the user-friendliness of each feature."

"This product is top-notch solution and the technology is the best on the market."

"Fortify helps us to stay updated with the newest languages and versions coming out."

More Fortify on Demand pros

"The CLI feature is quite useful because it gives us a lot of flexibility in what we want to do. If you use the UI, all the information is there and you can see what Snyk is showing you, but there is nothing else that you can change. However, when you use the CLI, then you can use commands and can get the output or response back from Snyk. You can also take advantage of that output in a different way. For the same reason, we have been using the CLI for the hard gate in the pipeline: Obtain a particular CDSS score for vulnerability. Based on that information, we can then decide if we want to block or allow the build. We have more flexibility if we use the CLI."

"Its reports are nice and provide information about the issue as well as resolution. They also provide a proper fix. If there's an issue, they provide information in detail about how to remediate that issue."

"Snyk has given us really good results because it is fully automated. We don't have to scan projects every time to find vulnerabilities, as it already stores the dependencies that we are using. It monitors 24/7 to find out if there are any issues that have been reported out on the Internet."

"Our overall security has improved. We are running fewer severities and vulnerabilities in our packages. We fixed a lot of the vulnerabilities that we didn't know were there."

"The product's most valuable features are an open-source platform, remote functionality, and good pricing."

"The most important feature of Snyk is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions such as Check Point."

"The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities."

"The dependency checks of the libraries are very valuable, but the licensing part is also very important because, with open source components, licensing can be all over the place. Our project is not an open source project, but we do use quite a lot of open source components and we want to make sure that we don't have surprises in there."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"We typically do our bulk uploads of our scans with some automation at the end of the development cycle but the scanning can take a lot of time. If you were doing all of it at regular intervals it would still consume a lot of time. This could procedure could improve."

"An improvement would be the ability to get vulnerabilities flowing automatically into another system."

"Reporting could be improved."

"There were some regulated compliances, which were not there."

"I would like the solution to add AI support."

"Micro Focus Fortify on Demand could improve the reports. They could benefit from being more user-friendly and intuitive."

"They could provide features for artificial intelligence similar to other vendors."

"They have very good support, but there is always room for improvement."

More Fortify on Demand cons

"There is always more work to do around managing the volume of information when you've got thousands of vulnerabilities. Trying to get those down to zero is virtually impossible, either through ignoring them all or through fixing them. That filtering or information management is always going to be something that can be improved."

"Because Snyk has so many integrations and so many things it can do, it's hard to really understand all of them and to get that information to each team that needs it... If there were more self-service, perhaps tutorials or overviews for new teams or developers, so that they could click through and see things themselves, that would help."

"We would like to have upfront knowledge on how easy it should be to just pull in an upgraded dependency, e.g., even introduce full automation for dependencies supposed to have no impact on the business side of things. Therefore, we would like some output when you get the report with the dependencies. We want to get additional information on the expected impact of the business code that is using the dependency with the newer version. This probably won't be easy to add, but it would be helpful."

"The feature for automatic fixing of security breaches could be improved."

"A feature we would like to see is the ability to archive and store historical data, without actually deleting it. It's a problem because it throws my numbers off. When I'm looking at the dashboard's current vulnerabilities, it's not accurate."

"Snyk has several limitations, including issues with Gradle, NPM, and Xcode, and trouble with AutoPR."

"Basically the licensing costs are a little bit expensive."

"We use Bamboo for CI.CD, and we had problems integrating Snyk with it. Ultimately, we got the two solutions to work together, but it was difficult."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'd rate it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"Micro Focus Fortify on Demand licenses are managed by our IT team and the license model is user-based."

"It is cost-effective."

"The price is fair compared to that of other solutions."

"We are still using the trial version at this point but I can already see from the trial version alone that it is a good product. For others, I would say that Fortify on Demand might look expensive at the beginning, but it is very powerful and so you shouldn't be put off by the price."

"There are different costs for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand depending on the assessments you want to use. There is only a standard license needed to use the solution."

"Despite being on the higher end in terms of cost, the biggest value lies in its abilities, including robust features, seamless integration, and high-quality findings."

"Fortify on Demand is more expensive than Burpsuite. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

More Fortify on Demand pricing and cost advice

"You can get a good deal with Snyk for pricing. It's a little expensive, but it is worth it."

"For what Snyk offers, it has the best cost-benefit I have ever seen because you're buying the license per user."

"Snyk is an expensive solution."

"It is pretty expensive. It is not a cheap product."

"Despite Snyk's coverage, scalability, reliability, and stability, it is available at a very competitive price."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a three. It is a cheap solution."

"I didn't think the price was that great, but it wasn't that bad, either. I'd rate their pricing as average in the market."

"The pricing is reasonable."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

It helps deploy and track changes easily as per time-to-time market upgrades.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

In comparison with other tools, they're competitive. It is not more expensive than other solutions, but their pricing is competitive. The licenses for Fortify On Demand are generally bought in unit...

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

There are frequent complaints about false positives from Fortify. One day it may pass a scan with no issues, and the next day, without any code changes, it will report vulnerabilities such as passw...

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Fortify on Demand

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Fortify on Demand

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs Fortify on Demand

Compared 12% of the time

Coverity vs Fortify on Demand

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub vs Fortify on Demand

Compared 3% of the time

More Fortify on Demand Competitors

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 12% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Black Duck vs Snyk

Compared 7% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Download Fortify on Demand product report

Fortify on Demand

June 2025

Download Snyk product report

May 2025

Also Known As

Micro Focus Fortify on Demand

Fugue

Overview

Fortify on Demand is a web application security testing tool that enables continuous monitoring. The solution is designed to help you with security testing, vulnerability management and tailored expertise, and is able to provide the support needed to easily create, supplement, and expand a software security assurance program without the need for additional infrastructure or resources.

Fortify on Demand Features

Fortify on Demand has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Deployment flexibility
Scalability
Built for DevSecOps
Ease of use
Supports 27+ languages
Real-time vulnerability identification with
Security Assistant
Actionable results in less than 1 hour for most applications with DevOps automation
Expanded coverage, accuracy and remediation details with IAST runtime agent
Continuous application monitoring of production applications
Virtual patches
Supports iOS and Android mobile applications
Security vulnerability identification
Behavioral and reputation analysis

Fortify on Demand Benefits

There are several benefits to implementing Fortify on Demand. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Fast remediation: With Fortify on Demand you can achieve fast remediation throughout the software lifecycle with robust assessments by a team of security experts.

Easy integration: The solution’s integration ecosystem is easy to use, creating a more secure software supply chain.

Security testing: Fortify on Demand covers in-depth mobile app security testing, open-source analysis, and vendor application security management, in addition to static and dynamic testing.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Fortify on Demand solution.

Dionisio V., Senior System Analyst at Azurian, says, "One of the top features is the source code review for vulnerabilities. When we look at source code, it's hard to see where areas may be weak in terms of security, and Fortify on Demand's source code review helps with that." He goes on to add, “Another reason I like Fortify on Demand is because our code often includes open source libraries, and it's important to know when the library is outdated or if it has any known vulnerabilities in it. This information is important to us when we're developing our solutions and Fortify on Demand informs us when it detects any vulnerable open source libraries.”

A Security Systems Analyst at a retailer mentions, “Being able to reduce risk overall is a very valuable feature for us.”

Jayashree A., Executive Manager at PepsiCo, comments, “Once we have our project created with our application pipeline connected to the test scanning, it only takes two minutes. The report explaining what needs to be modified related to security and vulnerabilities in our code is very helpful. We are able to do static and dynamic code scanning. When we are exploring some of the endpoints this solution identifies many loopholes that hackers could utilize for an attack. This has been very helpful and surprising how many vulnerabilities there can be.”

A Principal Solutions Architect at a security firm explains, “Its ability to perform different types of scans, keep everything in one place, and track the triage process in Fortify SSC stands out.”

PeerSpot user Mamta J., Co-Founder at TechScalable, states, "Almost all the features are good. This solution has simplified designing and architecting for our solutions. We were early adopters of microservices. Their documentation is good. You don't need to put in much effort in setting it up and learning stuff from scratch and start using it. The learning curve is not too much."

OpenText

Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.

Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.

What are the key features of Snyk?

Easy Integration: Snyk integrates with CI/CD pipelines, GitHub, and JIRA for seamless security management.
Multilingual Support: It offers extensive programming language support, enhancing project compatibility.
Actionable Insights: Provides accurate vulnerability detection with actionable remediation guidance.
Cloud and Container Security: Offers comprehensive checks for cloud and container environments, improving security posture.
Automation & Notifications: Automates vulnerability alerts and notifications for early threat identification in development.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Time Efficiency: Speeds up development by identifying and fixing vulnerabilities early in the software lifecycle.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes security risks with extensive vulnerability scanning and proactive alerting.
Productivity Boost: Enhances productivity by integrating security directly into developers' workflows.
Improved Compliance: Aids in maintaining license compliance and managing open-source dependencies effectively.

Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.

Sample Customers

SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief