Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline comparison

Forcepoint and Gigamon are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Forcepoint is ranked #34 with an average rating of 7.0, while Gigamon is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.3. Forcepoint holds a 0.3% mindshare in DLP, compared to Gigamon’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Forcepoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Gigamon users who would recommend it.
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Pr...
Read 3 Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP reviews
  • 120 Views
  • 51 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Gigamon Deep Observability ...
Read 8 Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline reviews
  • 38 Views
  • 12 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP are competitors in data protection and visibility. Users generally find Gigamon's pricing and support more attractive, but Forcepoint is considered stronger due to its comprehensive features, justifying its cost.

Features: Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline offers extensive network visibility, seamless integration with existing infrastructure, and enhanced traffic analysis. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection provides adaptive security controls, real-time data protection, and dynamic risk assessment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Gigamon offers straightforward deployment with robust customer service, ensuring smooth integration. Forcepoint provides a commendable deployment experience with a focus on adapting its security framework post-deployment, although Gigamon tends to offer better customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Gigamon typically has a lower initial setup cost with clear ROI paths appealing to cost-conscious buyers. Forcepoint may involve higher upfront costs but provides robust long-term data protection capabilities, seen as beneficial for substantial ROI over time through decreased risk exposure.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Pr...
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
34th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Gigamon Deep Observability ...
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
30th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (42nd), Event Monitoring (10th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (45th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (32nd), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (25th), Network Packet Broker (NPB) (1st), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is 0.2%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
 

Featured Reviews

Nataraj KS - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable product, key part of cybersecurity strategy but country-specific configuration issues requiring manual work
The onboarding process wasn't inherently complex, but it did take some time to open ports and configure the server. We're using three components of DLP: Endpoint DLP, email DLP, and web DLP. Web DLP isn't fully configured yet because we don't have a proxy. Email DLP took some additional coordination with a third party, and our Office 365 API, but those challenges were resolved. We have it installed and deployed on-premises. We have a partner who maintains it. It covers around 3,000 endpoints. It's deployed across our branches, factories, warehouses, and head office. It covers all endpoints in those locations. The deployment took some time due to our different locations.
Read full review
LeonardoAlves - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved the capability to analyze the environment and network problems with easy setup
It improved the capability to analyze the environment and network problems. It also helped streamline your security and performance monitoring The application I use is a script. My environment is a mix of technologies. I have many passionate people in my network who are on a journey in…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is purely a DLP-based solution, which makes it the best option available."
"We chose Forcepoint as part of our cybersecurity strategy, and one of the key expectations was to prevent data leakage."
"It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage."
"The most valuable feature for improving network visibility with Gigamon is the packet filtering capability."
"The solution is straightforward to set up."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the encryption feature. From a security perspective, the solution hasn't significantly strengthened our security posture. However, it has greatly improved performance by streamlining encryption processes and avoiding encryption at multiple layers. This has also simplified troubleshooting, as we can whitelist certain processes."
"It has high stability."
"It offers straightforward integration."
"The most valuable feature is NetFlow."
"It is a good product. It provides network visibility, which is important. Gigamon can bring some optimizations to my network. It is helpful for security inspection, and it makes my firewall work fast because my firewall doesn't have to do the inspection of the SSL connections, for example."
 

Cons

"The SaaS solution needs improvement, especially the malware-centric part, although the CASB is better but mostly data-centric. The after-sale support could also be improved."
"From an end user's perspective, it's not always clear what's happening with the DLP. It would be beneficial to have more use cases available, perhaps on a countrywide basis."
"The deployment is a little bit difficult. It requires two to three separate servers for databases and the application."
"In terms of improvement, while the initial setup is not overly complicated, we did encounter a few issues."
"They should increase the solution's cluster capacity."
"Its filtering feature needs improvement."
"The security should be improved."
"The graphical user interface could be improved."
"The Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline should have a feature showing the traffic flow within its platform. Currently, customers have to use separate tools for monitoring, which is inconvenient. If it had its visibility feature, it would make monitoring easier and more complete without needing extra tools."
"It only inspects a specific kind of traffic. There should be different kinds of use cases."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost is roughly 90 US dollars per year, per license."
"I would rate the solution as expensive, around an eight or nine out of ten. There are other competitive solutions available."
"The solution's price is reasonable."
"The solution is highly-priced."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Healthcare Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?
It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is very costly, especially in Sri Lanka, but the compliance ROI justifies the investment.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?
The SaaS solution needs improvement, especially the malware-centric part, although the CASB ( /products/casb-reviews ) is better but mostly data-centric. The after-sale support could also be improved.
See all answers
What do you like most about Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?
The most valuable feature for improving network visibility with Gigamon is the packet filtering capability.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?
The challenge is monitoring the cloud network. In on-premises environments, monitoring is straightforward, as I can verify all packets and communications. However, due to the way access tools and p...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?
It improved the capability to analyze the environment and network problems. It also helped streamline your security and performance monitoring.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Logo
Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline
Compared 23% of the time
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Data Broker vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Logo
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Data Broker vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline
Compared 11% of the time
Arista Data ANalyZer vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Logo
Arista Data ANalyZer vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline
Compared 8% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline
Compared 8% of the time
Big Switch Networks vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Logo
Big Switch Networks vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline
Compared 6% of the time
More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
June 2025
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP reportDownload Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP product report
Buyer's Guide
Event Monitoring
May 2025
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline reportDownload Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Gigamon, GigaSecure
 

Overview

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP offers dynamic security measures tailored to data protection needs, ensuring sensitive information is safeguarded efficiently.

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is designed to provide a balanced approach to data loss prevention by adapting security measures based on real-time risk assessment. This innovative system prioritizes protecting sensitive information while allowing for seamless workflow integration, making it a suitable choice for organizations looking to enhance their data protection strategies.

What are the key features of Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?
  • Dynamic Policy Enforcement: Automatically adjusts security policies in real-time based on risk analysis.
  • User Behavior Analysis: Monitors and analyzes user actions to identify potential threats.
  • Comprehensive Data Coverage: Offers protection for data across various environments and platforms.
  • Risk-Adaptive Responses: Provides threat mitigation options based on the assessed level of risk.
What benefits and ROI can be expected?
  • Reduced Data Breach Risks: By dynamically adjusting security measures, threats are mitigated proactively.
  • Operational Efficiency: Allows seamless integration of security with daily operations, minimizing disruptions.
  • Scalable Protection: Easily adapts to organizational growth and evolving security needs.
  • Cost-Effective Security: Optimizes resource allocation by focusing on high-risk areas.

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is particularly effective in industries with stringent data protection requirements such as healthcare, finance, and government. It adapts its security posture to the specific risks faced in these sectors, addressing compliance mandates and safeguarding sensitive information efficiently.

Forcepoint

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is a comprehensive network visibility solution that provides real-time insights into network traffic. It offers SSL inspection and mobile network monitoring for traffic monitoring purposes. The solution optimizes networks, aids in security inspection, and improves firewall performance. It is praised for its performance, power, straightforward integration, stability, and ease of initial setup. 

With Gigamon, organizations can gain complete visibility into their network traffic, identify potential threats, and take proactive measures to prevent them. The solution is ideal for organizations of all sizes, including enterprises, service providers, and government agencies.

Gigamon
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Amica Insurance, College of William & Mary, Gamma, IntercontinentalExchange, OppenheimerFunds
Buyer's Guide
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline
June 2025
Free Report: Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline
Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.