

SharePlex and FME compete in the data management field, focusing on data replication and transformation. SharePlex stands out for its cost-effectiveness and efficient customer support, while FME offers enhanced flexibility and a comprehensive feature set, justifying its higher price point.
Features: SharePlex provides real-time data replication, minimal downtime during migrations, and efficient support for multiple target replications. It is known for its reliability, accuracy in data read and write, and stability in data transfer. FME offers robust data integration across numerous formats, powerful data transformation capabilities, and an intuitive graphical user interface facilitating processing of spatial data with ease. Its interoperability and extensive connector plugins showcase its flexibility across applications.
Room for Improvement: SharePlex could enhance its user interface to be more user-friendly and expand its format support to better compete with versatile data management needs. Improvements in handling complex data transformations might give it an edge. FME could work on simplifying its deployment process as its comprehensive feature set brings a steep learning curve. Optimizing customer support for quicker integration and enhancing training resources to cover advanced features might benefit users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SharePlex offers straightforward deployment with a strong focus on traditional databases and provides responsive customer support ensuring smooth implementation. FME's deployment is more complex due to its wide range of features, requiring a more considerable learning curve. Although it provides training resources, users might need additional support for seamless integration. Its customer service is extensive but might require improvements to cater to faster deployment.
Pricing and ROI: SharePlex generally presents a lower initial setup cost, promoting robust ROI through low maintenance and efficient replication features. Conversely, FME's higher setup cost reflects its expansive capabilities in complex data environments, offering potentially greater long-term returns. The significant price difference highlights FME's enhanced functionality, which may be beneficial for complex data management needs. Both products deliver value relative to their feature sets and intended use cases.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| FME | 1.3% |
| SharePlex | 0.9% |
| Other | 97.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.
SharePlex delivers robust database replication and migration capabilities, emphasizing performance, synchronization, and data integrity management. Supporting high availability and real-time data syncing, it serves organizations handling vast transaction volumes, especially in IoT data processing.
SharePlex offers reliable data transfer and efficient multi-target replication. Its features like Compare and Repair utilities assist in maintaining data consistency. With PEP fostering scalability for large transactions, it caters to businesses aiming to cut down migration windows and minimize outages. Users employ SharePlex in real-time syncing and failover scenarios across data centers, crucial for handling extensive transaction data during migrations or upgrades.
What are SharePlex's key features?Organizations in sectors like finance and telecommunications implement SharePlex to maintain uninterrupted operations and ensure quick recovery times. By facilitating database migrations to cloud platforms like AWS, they achieve reduced downtime and enhanced operational efficiency, catering to the rigorous demands of data-driven industries.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.