Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs Red Hat CloudForms comparison

Flexera and Red Hat are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Flexera is ranked #32, while Red Hat is ranked #29. Flexera holds a 2.1% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Flexera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Read 4 Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) reviews

591 Views
561 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Red Hat CloudForms

Read 10 Red Hat CloudForms reviews

658 Views
645 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Red Hat CloudForms

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Flexera Cloud Management Platform and Red Hat CloudForms are competing in the cloud management solutions category. Flexera CMP seems to have the upper hand due to better support and pricing flexibility, while Red Hat CloudForms excels in integration and robust features.

Features: Flexera CMP offers comprehensive cost management and optimization with automation and policy-driven governance. It includes valuable features like multi-cloud management, robust cost analysis, and effective budget alerts. Red Hat CloudForms integrates seamlessly with existing IT systems and offers powerful orchestration capabilities. It supports dynamic catalogs, enhanced hybrid cloud configurations, and API-integrated workflows.

Room for Improvement: Flexera CMP could enhance its user interface for ease of navigation and improve its learning resources for faster onboarding. Users may also benefit from more advanced analytics tools. Red Hat CloudForms might improve its initial setup complexity by simplifying deployment processes and offering more intuitive user guidance. Additionally, expanding its compatibility with non-Red Hat ecosystems could enhance its versatility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Flexera CMP provides a smoother deployment process with straightforward configuration and exemplary customer service to support users. Red Hat CloudForms, while requiring more expertise for setup, benefits from comprehensive documentation and a robust support network that effectively aids in overcoming deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Flexera CMP is noted for its transparent pricing models leading to immediate cost optimization benefits with a favorable ROI. It offers lower initial costs and faster time-to-value. Red Hat CloudForms requires a higher initial investment that can be justified by its long-term efficiencies and powerful functionalities, appealing to those valuing robust capabilities over upfront cost concerns.

To learn more, read our detailed Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs. Red Hat CloudForms Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs. Red Hat CloudForms

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Ranking in Cloud Management

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat CloudForms

Ranking in Cloud Management

29th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) is 2.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat CloudForms is 1.5%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Red Hat CloudForms	1.5%
Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)	2.1%
Other	96.4%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2035479

Business Development Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Good CMPs for cloud provisioning and excellent scalability

There is a problem with integration due to invalid private node security certificates. However, the issue can be resolved by correcting the certificates. Getting OEMs like Huawei or Morpheus to change their products is difficult, but we found a middle ground where both Huawei and Morpheus can integrate seamlessly through Terraform. So far, the integration has been successful, but it may create a problem when the platform is under a huge load of 46 million students. We have already requested the World Bank and universities to build their case. If that kind of situation arises, they can approach Huawei and Morpheus or go with Plexadera in the end. Although the RSP or SMAX are built around Morpheus specifications specifically, we still have more certified engineers in Pakistan to win that project. The higher education commission of Pakistan has already taken up the matter with both Morpheus and Huawei. VMware refused to do anything, but Huawei has agreed to change the certificate if there is an issue. We have already identified the issue, so they will correct it if the cloud solution is finally deployed for that number of students.

Read full review

Ilhami Arikan

Cloud Services Automation Technologies Manager at Garanti Teknoloji

A stable solution that helps to provision servers

We use the solution to provision servers. I am impressed with the product's ability to create dynamic catalogs. The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved. I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. I would rate the product's scalability a seven out of ten and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is Optima, which is something that we use quite extensively."

"With this platform, users could migrate to the cloud on the go and use public cloud services like Oracle database while integrating with their own local storage."

"I am impressed with the product's reports."

"The solution is compatible and integrates with various infrastructures or providers."

"Red Hat CloudForms is stable once it is up and running."

"The most valuable features of Red Hat CloudForms are the benefit of the collective functionality."

"The stability of the solution is very good. We haven't had any issues with it."

"The multi-tenancy feature has been very helpful for our clients. It has been working fine and seamlessly for them. Its interface is also very simplified, and it is also an open and easy-to-scale solution."

"The optimization of the solution is quite interesting."

"Red Hat CloudForms is a stable product. There is no issue with the stability."

More Red Hat CloudForms pros

Cons

"There is a problem with integration due to invalid private node security certificates."

"Technical support is an area that can be improved."

"Our clients had challenges or issues with the updates. Its updates should be better managed. They should provide quicker and more stable updates. Its stability can also be better. We initially faced ease-of-use and compatibility issues while integrating it. We had a lot of compatibility issues with other products. Our clients are concerned about whether it is under IBM or it is still Red Hat. Clients are not very clear about the support, and they're not really happy with it. Currently, they're getting support from Red Hat, but going forward, they're not really clear about what would be the life cycle of the product, which is a concern for them."

"It is difficult to create a complete dashboard that includes all the needed features or catalogs."

"The problem is that the platform requires it to be maintained and updated. Also, a few cases are still pending with the Red Hat support team since they are not closed yet."

"All of the areas of Red Hat CloudForms could improve. It doesn't do half of the things that it says it can do out of the box. It takes configuration to make any of it work, which is not uncommon for solutions similar to this. However, it is frustrating."

"Red Hat CloudForms could improve by allowing more customization of reports. We have to do a lot of coding to accomplish what we want. Additionally, the compatibility with the multi-cloud could improve. The latter versions of the solution removed Google support and the cost comparison between other clouds was high."

"The complexity of the solution is a bit high in comparison to VMware."

"Because the solution needs to integrate with other products that surround it, there is a lot of configuration required, and this can be quite complex. It's not as easy as it is with, for example, VMware."

"I have issues with the solution's permissions. Unlike VMware, the product doesn't allow folder-type permissions."

More Red Hat CloudForms cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is higher than an open-source product, or CloudForms, or IBM Cloud Pak, but it is still not very high."

"Red Hat CloudForms is a bit expensive."

"The product's licensing is based on the number of servers."

"Red Hat CloudForms has a subscript-based pricing model. The cost is approximately $20,000 annually which allows you to use as many users as you want."

"The price of Red Hat CloudForms was not competitive, it was expensive."

"It is definitely cheaper than VMware. Everything is included. There is no challenge there."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Performing Arts

Insurance Company

University

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	7

Comparisons

IBM Spectrum Computing vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 19% of the time

Morpheus vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 19% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 17% of the time

Spot vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 15% of the time

Lumen Cloud Application Manager vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 12% of the time

More Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) Competitors

Morpheus vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 25% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 24% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 23% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 15% of the time

OpenNebula vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 13% of the time

More Red Hat CloudForms Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

October 2025

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) report

Download Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat CloudForms

September 2025

Download Red Hat CloudForms product report

Also Known As

RightScale Cloud Management Platform, MultiCloud Platform

No data available

Overview

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) offers comprehensive capabilities for managing cloud environments, enabling businesses to control costs, optimize resources, and ensure compliance across multiple cloud providers.

Flexera CMP is designed to streamline cloud management by providing a unified platform that supports automation, reporting, and policy enforcement. It empowers IT departments to efficiently manage multi-cloud environments by offering tools for workload optimization, visibility into cloud usage patterns, and governance features. Flexera CMP's integrations and customizable workflows enable seamless deployment and management of applications, reducing the complexity often associated with cloud operations.

What are the key features of Flexera CMP?

Multi-Cloud Management: Provides a centralized interface to manage resources across different cloud providers.
Cost Optimization: Identifies cost-saving opportunities through analysis and reporting tools.
Automation: Streamlines processes with automation capabilities for provisioning and lifecycle management.
Governance: Enforces policies to ensure compliance with industry standards and internal guidelines.
Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and reports on cloud utilization and performance.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Cost Reduction: Helps in reducing cloud spending through proactive cost management and optimization.
Resource Efficiency: Enhances resource allocation and utilization across cloud platforms.
Improved Compliance: Ensures adherence to best practices and regulatory requirements.
Increased Productivity: Automates routine tasks, allowing IT teams to focus on strategic initiatives.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides insights into cloud operations for better decision-making.

Flexera CMP is particularly valuable for industries with complex IT environments such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where effective cloud management is critical to maintaining continuous operations. By leveraging Flexera CMP, these industries can optimize their cloud strategies, balance workloads efficiently, and ensure data security and compliance, thereby driving business transformation.

Flexera

Manage container, virtual, private, and public cloud infrastructures

Managing a complex, hybrid IT environment can require multiple management tools, redundant policy implementations, and extra staff to handle the operations. Red Hat® CloudForms simplifies IT, providing unified management and operations in a hybrid environment.

As your IT infrastructure progresses from traditional virtualization toward an Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) model, CloudForms evolves, protecting your investments and providing consistent user experience and functionality.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Rackspace, Softlayer, Cloudstack, OpenStack, Vmware

Cox Automotive, Penn State, FICO, G-ABLE, Seneca College, ITandTEL, The Paris Lodron University of Salzburg (PLUS), MyRepublic, Macquarie, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, CBTS, Network Data Solutions (NDS)

Buyer's Guide

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs. Red Hat CloudForms

September 2025

Free Report: Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs. Red Hat CloudForms

Find out what your peers are saying about Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs. Red Hat CloudForms and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs. Red Hat CloudForms report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.