Fivetran vs Quest SharePlex comparison

Fivetran and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.8, while Quest Software is ranked #49. Fivetran holds a 2.3% mindshare in DI, compared to Quest Software’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 26 Fivetran reviews

3,228 Views
2,319 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Quest SharePlex

Read 5 Quest SharePlex reviews

1,346 Views
806 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

Quest SharePlex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Quest SharePlex and Fivetran are prominent competitors in the data integration category. While SharePlex excels with robust replication and reliability, Fivetran stands out due to its extensive data connectivity and automation features.

Features: Quest SharePlex offers real-time data replication, high availability, and reliable data delivery, making it ideal for enterprises focused on consistency. Fivetran provides automatic schema detection, a vast array of connectors, and managed pipelines, facilitating seamless integration of diverse data sources.

Room for Improvement: Quest SharePlex could enhance its integration flexibility and modernize its interface. More scalability options for various enterprise sizes would be beneficial. Additionally, expanding their connector options could make it more versatile. Fivetran might improve its cost-effectiveness for smaller enterprises, enhance user control over data transformation processes, and provide more detailed real-time analytics on data flows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Quest SharePlex is praised for its straightforward setup and dependable customer support, making it suitable for enterprise environments where reliability is key. Fivetran’s cloud-based model ensures quick deployment with minimal maintenance, ideal for businesses seeking effortless integration and a responsive support system.

Pricing and ROI: Quest SharePlex offers a cost-effective solution with favorable ROI for operations focused on stability in data replication. Fivetran requires a higher initial investment but provides substantial ROI through its scalable infrastructure and continuous updates, making it cost-effective over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. Quest SharePlex Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Quest SharePlex

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Integration

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (8th)

Quest SharePlex

Ranking in Data Integration

49th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 2.3%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quest SharePlex is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Mediha Šiljić

Lead Data Engineer at Sensilab

Built-in connectors offer extensive data source integration and time savings

Fivetran could improve by adapting more for technical users and by providing more options for such users. There should be more adaptability in terms of new features. If a specific feature is required, it should be integrated promptly. Improvement in existing connectors with new features is desirable. Enhancements around customer-focused product adaptation are also suggested.

Read full review

ManishJain7

Architect, Database Administration at Maximus

Excellent replication with good stability and very helpful support

I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training. Also, maybe if we could have a seperate section of showing out-of-sync tables in Foglight, instead of looking into the "warning" messages.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is very easy to use and very easy to configure."

"The most important feature of the solution is its ability to build data pipelines in less time."

"It is easy for users to get accustomed to the tool due to its gentle learning curve and clear error transparency."

"The most valuable feature of Fivetran is that it only synchronizes what needs to be synchronized."

"The user interface is mostly UI-based, eliminating the need for a lot of coding."

"The simplicity and scalability are the strongest features of Fivetran."

"Fivetran is remarkably easy to use; I haven't encountered any other data integration tool that is as user-friendly."

"Fivetran's most valuable feature is replication."

More Fivetran pros

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

Cons

"I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies."

"Fivetran is very expensive for data sources with a lot of rows, such as email data. I would like to see cheaper pricing for data sources like that."

"The biggest area for improvement is in customization, particularly in how Fivetran socializes its tools."

"The connections with SAP must be improved."

"HVR Software's technical support could be improved. Whenever we log a case, the response that we get from the support is a bit delayed."

"I would like to see an improvement in the support offered by Fivetran."

"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks."

"Some of the pain points we're looking at are trying to integrate some of the items in the Microsoft stack, so SharePoint and Excel, and then some of the newer Azure services."

More Fivetran cons

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is affordable."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

24%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 14% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Glue vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Oracle GoldenGate vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 62% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 14% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 10% of the time

IBM App Connect vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

More Quest SharePlex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

April 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest SharePlex

April 2025

Download Quest SharePlex product report

Also Known As

No data available

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

SharePlex database replication empowers your organization to achieve its database goals now and into the future. Make use of built-in monitoring, conflict resolution, data comparison and synchronization capabilities backed by award-winning support.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Quest SharePlex

April 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. Quest SharePlex

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. Quest SharePlex and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. Quest SharePlex report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.