Fivetran vs Quest SharePlex comparison

Fivetran and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.9, while Quest Software is ranked #48. Fivetran holds a 2.3% mindshare in DI, compared to Quest Software’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 27 Fivetran reviews

2,879 Views
1,732 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Quest SharePlex

Read 5 Quest SharePlex reviews

1,163 Views
666 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

Quest SharePlex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Quest SharePlex and Fivetran are prominent competitors in the data integration category. While SharePlex excels with robust replication and reliability, Fivetran stands out due to its extensive data connectivity and automation features.

Features: Quest SharePlex offers real-time data replication, high availability, and reliable data delivery, making it ideal for enterprises focused on consistency. Fivetran provides automatic schema detection, a vast array of connectors, and managed pipelines, facilitating seamless integration of diverse data sources.

Room for Improvement: Quest SharePlex could enhance its integration flexibility and modernize its interface. More scalability options for various enterprise sizes would be beneficial. Additionally, expanding their connector options could make it more versatile. Fivetran might improve its cost-effectiveness for smaller enterprises, enhance user control over data transformation processes, and provide more detailed real-time analytics on data flows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Quest SharePlex is praised for its straightforward setup and dependable customer support, making it suitable for enterprise environments where reliability is key. Fivetran’s cloud-based model ensures quick deployment with minimal maintenance, ideal for businesses seeking effortless integration and a responsive support system.

Pricing and ROI: Quest SharePlex offers a cost-effective solution with favorable ROI for operations focused on stability in data replication. Fivetran requires a higher initial investment but provides substantial ROI through its scalable infrastructure and continuous updates, making it cost-effective over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. Quest SharePlex Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Quest SharePlex

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Integration

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (5th)

Quest SharePlex

Ranking in Data Integration

48th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 2.3%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quest SharePlex is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Mediha Šiljić

Lead Data Engineer at Sensilab

Built-in connectors offer extensive data source integration and time savings

Fivetran could improve by adapting more for technical users and by providing more options for such users. There should be more adaptability in terms of new features. If a specific feature is required, it should be integrated promptly. Improvement in existing connectors with new features is desirable. Enhancements around customer-focused product adaptation are also suggested.

Read full review

Kristopher Wells

Oracle DBA at Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

It reduces the downtime and migration time exponentially

I would rate SharePlex's high availability, and disaster recovery features highly. It works as advertised in terms of rapid fill-over and switch-over opportunities. It reduces the migration time for a multi-terabyte database to an hour or less because it performs real-time replication. SharePlex reduces downtime and migration time exponentially. Something that could take 12 to 24 hours is cut down to one to two hours. By the time you start to migrate, the only remaining replication is a slight difference in data from the point when SharePlex has shut down, and the application has to also switch over to the new database. It allowed the company to replicate data more transparently. Some of the business executives probably don't even know it's there. It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems. It provides what is needed. There's little concern about whether or not it functions. It's allowed the company to achieve its objectives with its clients, reducing and minimizing downtime for substantial migrations and upgrades. It can reduce hardware and storage costs, but my company doesn't utilize it with high-availability architecture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The simplicity of the solution is its valuable feature."

"The product has some seamless connectors, which are readily available."

"It is not like a traditional ETL, but it gives quite a lot of flexibility."

"The ease of usability is the most valuable feature. It's very easy and quick to set up. It also has a central hub as opposed to GoldenGate which is one direct interface. For GoldenGate I would have needed three interfaces whereas with HVR I have a central interface that manages everything."

"Fivetran is remarkably easy to use; I haven't encountered any other data integration tool that is as user-friendly."

"SysTrack load is the best feature."

"The ease of setting up the connectors and transformations is highly valuable."

"The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering."

More Fivetran pros

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

Cons

"There is not a lot of options to customize the pipeline, and the cost is high."

"There was a random change to our contract in a unilateral manner after the first year. The overall cost of using Fivetran was then unclear and this is the reason I would not recommend this solution."

"Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors."

"It should have a few more monitoring functionalities."

"The biggest area for improvement is in customization, particularly in how Fivetran socializes its tools."

"Their pricing has increased over the years, so it's not seen as an advantage anymore."

"The documentation is decent, but it's hard to find information online about Fivetran. For example, if you try to search for an error code, you won't find much information about it in forums."

"I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies."

More Fivetran cons

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"The solution is affordable."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 13% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Oracle GoldenGate vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 62% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 14% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 10% of the time

IBM App Connect vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 7% of the time

More Quest SharePlex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

June 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest SharePlex

May 2025

Download Quest SharePlex product report

Also Known As

No data available

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

SharePlex database replication empowers your organization to achieve its database goals now and into the future. Make use of built-in monitoring, conflict resolution, data comparison and synchronization capabilities backed by award-winning support.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Quest SharePlex

May 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. Quest SharePlex

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. Quest SharePlex and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. Quest SharePlex report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.