We performed a comparison between ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and Fortinet FortiGate IPS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is scalable."
"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."
"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."
"Has a very user-friendly interface and doesn't require any prior knowledge."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiGate IPS is its efficiency."
"Integrated management is a very valuable feature."
"It's simple to operate and use."
"Fortinet FortiGate IPS has an easy-to-use interface and configuration."
"The solution can scale."
"Before using this solution, we had so many problems accessing our resources because we don't have a lot of internet bandwidth. And by using application control and traffic shaping, we were able to manage user to quickly access services that are important. This tool has aided to the simplicity of our day-to-day management."
"I prefer FortiGate because it has a lot of other solutions embedded within it and is the easiest for our technicians to operate."
"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."
"There needs to be more support."
"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."
"The IPS monitoring can be improved."
"The system can slow down when inspections are carried out."
"Fortinet FortiGate IPS could improve the VPN. There are times it is slow."
"IPs are not handled well and the process is unnecessarily complicated."
"The solution could maybe use more integration with artificial intelligence to be more proactive."
"The interface and product support could use improvement."
"The customization is a little bit difficult."
"The graphical interface could be improved."
ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is ranked 22nd in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 3 reviews while Fortinet FortiGate IPS is ranked 4th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 54 reviews. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is rated 8.6, while Fortinet FortiGate IPS is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 writes "A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate IPS writes "Very stable with good network protection". ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is most compared with ExtraHop Reveal(x), Corelight and Forescout Platform, whereas Fortinet FortiGate IPS is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Cisco NGIPS, Check Point IPS and Splunk User Behavior Analytics. See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Fortinet FortiGate IPS report.
See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.