No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Exoscale Object Storage vs Superna comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Everpure FlashArray
Sponsored
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
234
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (2nd)
Exoscale Object Storage
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
File and Object Storage (51st)
Superna
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Backup (84th), File and Object Storage (39th), Cyberstorage (5th)
 

Featured Reviews

Cristian Ion - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Information Technology Engineer at Eta2u
All-flash storage has unified my clients’ workloads and has reduced TCO through efficient data services
The pricing and licensing of Everpure FlashArray is a problem because Everpure is considered more expensive than competitors. IBM, Lenovo, and Dell are more aggressive on prices. It is a very complicated market, especially now, and I understand the prices are higher at Everpure because of the software and all the enhancements it has. However, in this competitive market, we have a big problem selling to customers that are on a tight budget. A product with better pricing would be a win in the end. The RC or C20, for example, was a very good product that I could sell more easily than other options. Everpure FlashArray//C is sufficient for most workloads and virtualization workloads if you do not have very large databases. A product like that helps, and perhaps a new product in the future that is a little cheaper than the current options would be a possibility to gain more market share. I see the return on investment clearly from using Everpure FlashArray, but the challenge is selling it to customers for the first time. There are many customers who fall in the sweet spot where they are too small for an X or even a C model. They need something a little cheaper, they have the money for a cheaper version, and they need the performance of a Pure system. These customers could be more easily approached if Everpure offers a version of a local device in the future that is even cheaper than the C-class. I am trying now to help customers understand the concept behind AG1. I know that AG1 is not profitable if capacity is less than 50 terabytes. However, some customers would be very willing to pay for 25 terabytes in a cloud operated by Pure and to have it accessible with very good speed. We will see what the future brings.
Use Exoscale Object Storage?
Leave a review
Use Superna?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
921,714 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
No data available
Construction Company
18%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business74
Midsize Enterprise38
Large Enterprise162
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which should I choose: HPE 3PAR StoreServ or Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series?
Both are great platforms, but if you are considering all flash solutions, I would recommend you to consider Pure Stor...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashArray?
When comparing cost, I find that the cost is either the same or slightly higher, but that is returned by the ease of ...
What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashArray?
The only thing I think could be improved is price. The price is the main concern for our customers.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Pure Storage FlashArray
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nielsen, Lamar Advertising, LinkedIn, Betfair, UT-Dallas
1. Acme Corporation 2. Amazon 3. Apple Inc 4. ATT 5. Bayer AG 6. BNP Paribas 7. Cisco Systems 8. Coca-Cola Company 9. Dell Technologies 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Eni SpA 12. Ericsson 13. Facebook 14. Ford Motor Company 15. Google 16. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 17. Honeywell International 18. IBM 19. Intel Corporation 20. Johnson & Johnson 21. JPMorgan Chase Co 22. Koninklijke Philips NV 23.L'Oreal 24. Lufthansa Group 25. Merck Co Inc 26. Microsoft 27. Nestle 28. Nike 29. Oracle Corporation 30. Panasonic Corporation 31. SAP 32. Siemens AG
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Red Hat, Nutanix and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: November 2026.
921,714 professionals have used our research since 2012.