Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Exabeam vs Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management comparison

The compared Exabeam and Microsoft solutions aren't in the same category. Exabeam is ranked #20 in SIEM , with an average rating of 7.4, and holds a 1.6% mindshare in the category. Microsoft is ranked #2 in IRM , with an average rating of 7.5, and holds a 13.4% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Exabeam
Read 19 Exabeam reviews
  • 3,896 Views
  • 2,182 Comparison Views
73% willing to recommend
Microsoft Purview Insider R...
Read 4 Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management reviews
  • 1,673 Views
  • 151 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Exabeam and Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Microsoft and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: October 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
October 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 872,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Exabeam
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (20th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (2nd), Security Incident Response (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (13th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (13th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (11th)
Microsoft Purview Insider R...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Microsoft Security Suite (29th), Insider Risk Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Exabeam is designed for Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and holds a mindshare of 1.6%, up 1.1% compared to last year.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, on the other hand, focuses on Insider Risk Management, holds 13.4% mindshare, down 15.0% since last year.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Exabeam1.6%
Wazuh10.2%
Splunk Enterprise Security9.2%
Other79.0%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Insider Risk Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management13.4%
Proofpoint Insider Threat Management18.2%
Varonis Platform13.0%
Other55.4%
Insider Risk Management
 

Featured Reviews

Stephen-Armstrong - PeerSpot reviewer
The SIEM provides a user-friendly UI experience
When events come into the system, the dashboard categorizes them by the highest risk score, not when they appear on the system. When you've got multiple ongoing incidents you can only see the highest risk score at the top of the list rather than the most recent detection. Exabeam's reporting dashboard could have included a filtering option to filter by the most recent detection.
Read full review
Karthik Ekambaram - PeerSpot reviewer
Have consistently built secure internal environments while implementing compliance tools for diverse customer needs
The customizable alerts system needs improvement. The detection rules are not extensive enough. There should be more possibilities for creating alerts based on additional criteria. While rules can be customized, the available criteria for creating detection rules should be expanded. Microsoft's pricing is very expensive. The Business Premium offering should be extended to enterprise customers, as it's currently limited to 300 users. There should be a tier below E5 that includes Microsoft Purview and other features. Currently, E5 licensing costs approximately 6,000 INR per user per month including taxes. Competitive solutions offer similar functionality at about 50% of Microsoft's cost. Email DLP is included in Business Premium or P1 licenses, while P2 licenses cover endpoint DLP and additional channels. Microsoft should introduce an intermediate tier below E5 that covers all P1 licenses, as customers often need coverage across the entire M365 suite.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ThreatHunter in Advanced Analytics is the most valuable. It helps analyze compromised assets and provides analysis for any entity within my client's environment."
"The most valuable feature of Exabeam is the timeline creation based on log sources, which helps in security investigations."
"I have customers that like the EUBA functionality of it. The solution has the ability to build a session, basically. It pulls a lot of information together, for example, everything a user does in a specific timeframe. It's quite helpful."
"Exabeam has improved our organization by speeding up the investigation process."
"It is user-friendly and quite simple to use."
"The UI was very clean."
"The way it can connect with AWS is very useful, and the integrations are pretty good."
"It's a very user-friendly product and it's a very comprehensive technology."
More Exabeam pros
"The scoring mechanism is exceptional because it eliminates the need to reinvent criteria for identifying risks, misconfigurations, or vulnerabilities."
"Insider Risk Management's graphing is highly specific and useful. You can see the last six months of data for the Microsoft tenant. You can easily find what you need. For example, you can filter for alerts about devices, emails, etc."
"Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management was helpful in performing investigations after alerts were received."
"The best thing about Purview is that it's easy to integrate with our day-to-day environment. We have Active Directory, and Word and Excel. Using a third-party vendor and trying to integrate with our existing environment would be much more challenging."
 

Cons

"We still have questions surrounding hardware deployment."
"Updating the new release of Exabeam Fusion SIEM takes time and slows our performance."
"We had a large volume right from the beginning and they weren't quite prepared for that. That's something that they should think about when it comes to customers that have a large volume to start off with."
"Exabeam's reporting dashboard could have included a filtering option to filter by the most recent detection."
"The solution's reporting and dashboarding could be improved."
"The initial setup of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is complex because it needs to integrate with the SIEM solution, but after this is complete it is straightforward."
"The only problem is that the UI is not very impressive."
"We use the on-prem Exabeam product and face limitations using the web UI and administration of custom models and rules."
More Exabeam cons
"For certain things, you need to install an agent. I understand it's for integrity, but if there could be a clientless solution for certain aspects, it would make life easier."
"Microsoft's pricing is very expensive. The Business Premium offering should be extended to enterprise customers, as it's currently limited to 300 users."
"The reporting capabilities sometimes leave a little to be desired. It could be improved in terms of producing reports to provide information to the C-suite or others."
"The user interface also isn't user-friendly. When we introduce Insider Risk Management to our clients, they often find it difficult to understand. There is too much information, and the UI is not scalable. Also, entry-level IT technicians are not always interested in learning something new. It should be clearer and easier to understand."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."
"The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten."
"There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."
"Exabeam is not a cheap solution."
"They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."
"The solution is expensive."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
37%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
I do not have much information about the pricing. However, I am aware that Exabeam is cheaper than Palo Alto based on discussions in meetings.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
We use the on-prem Exabeam product and face limitations using the web UI and administration of custom models and rules. I have explored the SaaS version; it offers many new features. We are conside...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management?
The customizable alerts system needs improvement. The detection rules are not extensive enough. There should be more possibilities for creating alerts based on additional criteria. While rules can ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management?
We are a cybersecurity consulting and implementation organization. We implement solutions to our customers for Microsoft Intune, Google Workspace, and other platforms. We also use Microsoft Intune ...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management?
I would recommend Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management to others. I would rate the overall solution as a nine.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam
Compared 13% of the time
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam Logo
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam
Compared 7% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Exabeam Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Exabeam
Compared 5% of the time
LogRhythm SIEM vs Exabeam Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs Exabeam
Compared 5% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs Exabeam Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Exabeam
Compared 5% of the time
More Exabeam Competitors
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management Logo
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Compared 39% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Identity vs Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management Logo
Microsoft Defender for Identity vs Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Compared 23% of the time
Netskope Advanced Analytics vs Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management Logo
Netskope Advanced Analytics vs Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Compared 20% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Compared 4% of the time
Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management Logo
Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Compared 3% of the time
More Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Exabeam
October 2025
Exabeam reportDownload Exabeam product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
October 2025
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management reportDownload Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft Insider Risk Management
 

Overview

Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

Exabeam

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management helps organizations identify and manage potential internal threats by utilizing advanced analytics and insights to minimize risk.

With a focus on addressing internal threats, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management employs sophisticated analytics to proactively detect and manage risks. It offers context-rich insights to protect data, helping businesses maintain compliance and safeguard their information. By implementing mechanisms to predict potential risks, it aids in preventing data loss and ensures that sensitive information remains secure.

What are the most important features of Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management?
  • Advanced Analytics: Provides in-depth analysis to detect suspicious activities within the organization.
  • Data Protection: Ensures sensitive data security with robust preventive measures.
  • Risk Insights: Delivers actionable insights to help mitigate potential insider threats.
  • Compliance Support: Assists organizations in maintaining compliance with industry regulations.
What benefits should businesses expect from Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management?
  • Efficient Risk Mitigation: Streamlines identifying and addressing insider threats, saving time and resources.
  • Enhanced Data Security: Protects sensitive data, reducing the likelihood of data breaches.
  • Better Decision Making: Offers insights that help organizations make informed decisions about security protocols.

In industries like finance and healthcare, where data sensitivity is critical, adopting Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management can be crucial. For example, financial institutions utilize this tool to detect and mitigate fraudulent activities, while healthcare providers leverage its capabilities to protect patient data, ensuring compliance with data protection regulations. Its implementation varies across industries but consistently focuses on securing valuable information and reducing risk exposure.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
October 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Microsoft and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: October 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.