Exabeam vs FileAudit comparison

Exabeam and IS Decisions are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Exabeam is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.5, while IS Decisions is ranked #61. Exabeam holds a 1.7% mindshare in SIEM, compared to IS Decisions’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IS Decisions users who would recommend it.

Exabeam

Read 20 Exabeam reviews

5,565 Views
2,671 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

FileAudit

Read 3 FileAudit reviews

1,131 Views
713 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Exabeam

FileAudit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

FileAudit and Exabeam are popular cybersecurity solutions with distinct strengths. Exabeam is seen as superior in features, making it worth the price according to user reviews.

Features: FileAudit users appreciate real-time monitoring, ease of use, and better pricing. Exabeam users value advanced analytics, comprehensive threat detection, and sophisticated features, giving it the upper hand in functionality.

Room for Improvement: FileAudit users mention a need for better scalability, enhanced reporting tools, and usability improvements. Exabeam users seek more straightforward configuration, reduced false positives, and technical enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FileAudit users find the deployment process simple and commend the responsive customer service. Exabeam users report a more complex deployment but acknowledge knowledgeable support.

Pricing and ROI: FileAudit offers cost-effective solutions with quick ROI according to users. Exabeam, while more expensive, is justified by its advanced capabilities and long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Exabeam vs. FileAudit Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Exabeam vs. FileAudit

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Exabeam

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (1st), Security Incident Response (4th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (9th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (11th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (9th)

FileAudit

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

61st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (55th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Exabeam is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FileAudit is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Exabeam	1.7%
FileAudit	0.6%
Other	97.7%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Deepanshu Hans

Solution Architect at CTC

Improved threat detection has provided clear user risk insights and streamlined incident response

Exabeam's UEBA is the most valuable feature that I have found so far. Exabeam's UEBA displays the type of description that it could show in a console regarding one particular user, the rating that it shows, and how vulnerable the user is, which is very good. Exabeam's automation for incident response is very good. The machine learning capabilities of Exabeam are also good.

Read full review

AntoSebastin

Cyber Security Consultant - APAC at Logon Software

A scalable SIEM solution for monitoring a user's activity in the file server

The most valuable features of the solution are its quick and simple features related to advanced permissions for files, allowing for what permission needs to be granted to the users when it comes to the monitoring folder in the solution. If someone who has been denied permission to use a particular folder tries to go to that folder, then the administrator gets a notification. In general, the administrator can easily gather and maintain records if a person who has been denied permission to a particular confidential folder tries to access it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface and the timelines they use are the most valuable features, and the price model is very simple so that one can understand it easily and there are no surprises within it."

"I have customers that like the EUBA functionality of it; the solution has the ability to build a session, basically, pulling a lot of information together, for example, everything a user does in a specific timeframe, which is quite helpful."

"Exabeam's UEBA displays the type of description that it could show in a console regarding one particular user, the rating that it shows, and how vulnerable the user is, which is very good."

"The user interface and the timelines they use are the most valuable features. The price model is very simple so that one can understand it easily and there are no surprises within it."

"The solution's automation capabilities are great."

"Exabeam Fusion SIEM has a good performance and more advantages than traditional solutions."

"The setup is not difficult. It was easy."

"The advanced analytics has a really great overview of user behavior."

More Exabeam pros

"Our customer acquires the complete report which is kept for future auditing purposes."

"It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Alerting upon file changes is the most valuable aspect of the product."

"FileAudit has helped our client to bring order to the day-to-day management of these folders, through the use of information triggers that inform department managers of both file obsolescence and changes made by employees."

Cons

"Exabeam's integration capabilities are not good, as Exabeam has a very limited number of integrations and no out-of-box integration, which is an area where Exabeam should improve."

"Updating the new release of Exabeam Fusion SIEM takes time and slows our performance."

"The only problem is that the UI is not very impressive."

"I believe if it were more flexible it would be a better product."

"Exabeam needs to improve its adaptive nature towards rules and its capability to understand the entire client environment faster."

"We had a large volume right from the beginning and they weren't quite prepared for that."

"I tried to send an email, however, no one has replied."

"There is a lack of Indonesian support, it would benefit us to have more support for the customers."

More Exabeam cons

"The updates management and central management console could be improved."

"The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks."

"Whenever someone cuts and paste, it shows as "file is deleted"."

"The updates management and central management console could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Exabeam is not a cheap solution."

"Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."

"They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."

"The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten."

"There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."

"The solution is expensive."

"FileAudit provides a trial license for 30 days, and after that, customers can choose between perpetual licensing or the annual-based licensing option offered by FileAudit."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Exabeam Fusion SIEM?

I do not have much information about the pricing. However, I am aware that Exabeam is cheaper than Palo Alto based on discussions in meetings.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Exabeam Fusion SIEM?

Exabeam's integration capabilities are not good, as Exabeam has a very limited number of integrations and no out-of-box integration, which is an area where Exabeam should improve. I have noticed th...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam

Compared 6% of the time

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs Exabeam

Compared 5% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Exabeam

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Exabeam

Compared 4% of the time

More Exabeam Competitors

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs FileAudit

Compared 24% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs FileAudit

Compared 10% of the time

ManageEngine File Audit Plus vs FileAudit

Compared 9% of the time

Power Admin PA File Sight vs FileAudit

Compared 6% of the time

SIEMStorm vs FileAudit

Compared 6% of the time

More FileAudit Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Exabeam

March 2026

Download Exabeam product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

March 2026

Download FileAudit product report

Overview

Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

Exabeam

Agentless, remote and non-intrusive, FileAudit offers a simple more user-friendly way to safeguard and secure file access in a Windows environment. FileAudit provides real-time monitoring and alerting on all access (or access attempts). FileAudit also implements contextual functions such as mass access and alteration alerts, tracking source IP address information for remote data access, and providing granular time and date alerting parameters to monitor folder and file access at unusual or unexpected times.

IS Decisions

Sample Customers

Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank

CommuniCare Health Centre, DP World, BAE Systems, Moet Hennessy, Ernst & Young, Honda, Volswagon, VTech, GlakoSmithKline, Lockheed Martin, US Navy, University of Alabama, Ministry of Interior Saudi Arabia, Total

Buyer's Guide

Exabeam vs. FileAudit

March 2026

Free Report: Exabeam vs. FileAudit

Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam vs. FileAudit and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Exabeam vs. FileAudit report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.