ETL Solutions Transformation Manager vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ETL Solutions Transformation Manager and MuleSoft Composer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed ETL Solutions Transformation Manager vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a reliable solution.""Back in the day, we could only get reports and analyze what happened after the fact, but today now we can generate real-time insights. Transformation Manager feeds your data science projects. We generate models and then give them to the clients, so they can come up with real-time predictions and recommendations in addition to reporting.""It is among the best, even if not widely known."

More ETL Solutions Transformation Manager Pros →

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.""The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it.""The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side.""The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

More MuleSoft Composer Pros →

Cons
"They should build a functional architecture based on queuing.""Transformation Manager reporting could be better. There are better options for reporting tools these days. We use Microsoft BI sometimes, but Tableau is becoming too expensive. Microsoft BI's visualization features are maturing.""There is room for improvement in the solution's visualization tool."

More ETL Solutions Transformation Manager Cons →

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability.""This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms.""One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real.""The technical support team's response time must be improved."

More MuleSoft Composer Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."
  • "MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."
  • "The tool is a bit expensive."
  • More MuleSoft Composer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:ETL Solutions Transformation Manager is much more affordable than other solutions like AWS, Blue, or Informatica. Even though some competitors may offer seemingly economical pricing, the resource… more »
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in the solution's visualization tool. Currently, it provides basic reports and the ability to create graphs and dashboards, but I'm looking forward to more robust… more »
    Top Answer:The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money.
    Top Answer:The tool is a bit expensive. However, we must pay a premium price for the best solutions. It would be great if the pricing could be reduced by 20% to 30%. Then, medium-level companies would be able to… more »
    Top Answer:The product must create more awareness and enable more use cases. It will help us use the solution for current problems. The vendor must reach out to the technical leads of organizations and teach… more »
    Ranking
    32nd
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    447
    Comparisons
    411
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    431
    Rating
    9.0
    40th
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    448
    Comparisons
    383
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    313
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Transformation Manager
    MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce
    Learn More
    Overview
    Transformation Manager is an integrated development toolkit that is used to build data migration and data integration solutions more efficiently. A metadata-driven code generator, Transformation Manager provides users with the ability to generate lightweight, easy-to-deploy code. It combines a Graphical User Interface with a statement-driven mapping language. The Transformation Manager software derives metadata from the elements, attributes and relationships in a source and target model. Transformation Manager then uses rules specified by Simple Mapping Language (SML), which is specifically designed for implementing data transformation projects, to generate code written in Java.

    Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

    Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

    - Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
    - Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
    - Preview as you build connections and design with real data
    - Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

      Sample Customers
      Honda, BNP Paribas, RBS, JPMorgan, Volkswagen, Thorn Lighting, OpenSpirit, Rolls-Royce, Ulster Bank
      Information Not Available
      Top Industries
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm21%
      Computer Software Company14%
      Retailer7%
      Educational Organization7%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company28%
      Financial Services Firm9%
      Manufacturing Company9%
      Government6%
      Company Size
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business15%
      Midsize Enterprise16%
      Large Enterprise69%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business18%
      Midsize Enterprise13%
      Large Enterprise69%
      Buyer's Guide
      ETL Solutions Transformation Manager vs. MuleSoft Composer
      May 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about ETL Solutions Transformation Manager vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
      770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      ETL Solutions Transformation Manager is ranked 32nd in Data Integration with 3 reviews while MuleSoft Composer is ranked 40th in Data Integration with 4 reviews. ETL Solutions Transformation Manager is rated 9.0, while MuleSoft Composer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ETL Solutions Transformation Manager writes "It lets us create models so we can generate real-time predictions and insights for a our clients". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved". ETL Solutions Transformation Manager is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration, TIBCO Spotfire, Denodo and Altair Monarch, whereas MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Zapier. See our ETL Solutions Transformation Manager vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

      See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

      We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.