IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs erwin Data Catalog by Quest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between erwin Data Catalog by Quest and IBM InfoSphere Information Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Metadata Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. erwin Data Catalog by Quest Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The data catalog feature is pretty good.""When you combine it with data lineage, every time you need to make a change, it allows you to do impact analysis on any changes and then connect to the end-users or data stewards so that they can be aware that a change is coming. That's one of the main benefits we use it for."

More erwin Data Catalog by Quest Pros →

"The integration with different technologies is the most valuable feature.""This solution is extremely flexible and scalable.""IBM InfoSphere Information Server is stable.""Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More IBM InfoSphere Information Server Pros →

Cons
"There are always ways to improve things. For example, we can use AI to be able to find out something. When we are typing something, if we don't know the exact term, Artificial Intelligence would be useful to find terms that are phonetically or syntactically similar. Instead of having to type in the exact name, they can provide those in the list. So, they can provide AI support for the search because when you have thousands and thousands of terms, it is hard to remember all the names.""There is room for improvement with respect to the connector and how to connect to the structured and unstructured database."

More erwin Data Catalog by Quest Cons →

"This solution would benefit from the engine being made more lightweight.""IBM InfoSphere Information Server should be more scalable. It should have the option to change the configuration to run on a single, non-multiple node, or multi-threading processing.""Their technical support needs improvement.""There are certain shortcomings in the cloud side of the solution, where improvements are required."

More IBM InfoSphere Information Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I am not very familiar with its pricing. I know it is not cheap, but it is also not super expensive. It depends on the company size. For a company making $1 million, it is very expensive. For a company making 10 million and above, it might be okay."
  • "Erwin Data Catalog is very expensive."
  • More erwin Data Catalog by Quest Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing cost of IBM InfoSphere Information Server depends on how many users there are."
  • More IBM InfoSphere Information Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Metadata Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cubes… more »
    Top Answer:The data catalog feature is pretty good.
    Top Answer:Erwin Data Catalog is very expensive. I would rate it a two out of five for affordability.
    Top Answer:Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:There are certain shortcomings in the cloud side of the solution, where improvements are required. In our company, we are presently in the process of doing a PoC phase since we have the solution… more »
    Top Answer:I use IBM InfoSphere Information Server in retail banking for transformation purposes.
    Ranking
    12th
    out of 27 in Metadata Management
    Views
    268
    Comparisons
    211
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    564
    Rating
    7.0
    10th
    out of 27 in Metadata Management
    Views
    244
    Comparisons
    207
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    373
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    InfoSphere Information Server, IBM Information Server
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    erwin Data Catalog (DC), part of the erwin Data Intelligence Suite, automates enterprise metadata management, including data mapping, code generation, data profiling, data lineage and impact analysis. It integrates and activates data in a single, unified catalog in accordance with business requirements by scheduling ongoing scans of metadata from the widest array of data sources, keeping metadata current with full versioning and change management, and easily mapping data elements from source to target, including data at rest and in motion, and harmonize data integration across platforms.

    IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a market-leading data integration platform which includes a family of products that enable you to understand, cleanse, monitor, transform, and deliver data, as well as to collaborate to bridge the gap between business and IT. InfoSphere Information Server provides massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities to deliver a highly scalable and flexible integration platform that handles a variety of data volumes (big, small, and everything in between).
    Sample Customers
    Balfour Beatty Construction, Banco de México, BFSI Canada, CenturyLink, Daktronics
    Canadian National Railway Company, Chickasaw Nation Division of Commerce, Swedish Armed Forces, BG RCI, Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., University of Arizona, Biogrid Australia
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Government11%
    Insurance Company9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. erwin Data Catalog by Quest
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. erwin Data Catalog by Quest and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    erwin Data Catalog by Quest is ranked 12th in Metadata Management with 2 reviews while IBM InfoSphere Information Server is ranked 10th in Metadata Management with 7 reviews. erwin Data Catalog by Quest is rated 7.6, while IBM InfoSphere Information Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of erwin Data Catalog by Quest writes "Helps with metadata management, saves time, and allows us to do impact analysis on any changes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere Information Server writes "Prompt support, reliable, but lacking scalability". erwin Data Catalog by Quest is most compared with Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog, Talend Open Studio, Alation Data Catalog, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and WhereScape RED, whereas IBM InfoSphere Information Server is most compared with IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Qlik Replicate, IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog, IBM Cloud Pak for Data and Oracle GoldenGate. See our IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. erwin Data Catalog by Quest report.

    See our list of best Metadata Management vendors.

    We monitor all Metadata Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.