Entrust Identity Enterprise vs Zilla Security comparison

Entrust Datacard and Zilla Security are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Entrust Datacard is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6, while Zilla Security is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0. Entrust Datacard holds a 0.8% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Zilla Security’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Entrust Datacard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zilla Security users who would recommend it.

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews

374 Views
267 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Zilla Security

Read 2 Zilla Security reviews

222 Views
140 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Zilla Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

Entrust Identity Enterprise and Zilla Security are products in the identity management and security category. Entrust Identity Enterprise has the upper hand in support and integration capabilities, while Zilla Security appeals to those valuing innovative features and a streamlined approach.

Features: Entrust Identity Enterprise offers multi-factor authentication, robust credential management, and extensive integration with enterprise systems. Zilla Security focuses on identity governance, comprehensive compliance tracking, and cloud security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entrust Identity Enterprise has a straightforward deployment model with strong technical support, ensuring seamless onboarding. Zilla Security is recognized for responsive customer service and comprehensive support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Entrust Identity Enterprise involves a higher setup cost, potentially leading to significant long-term ROI for larger organizations. Zilla Security offers a cost-effective setup that provides excellent value through innovative governance features.

To learn more, read our detailed Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Zilla Security Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Zilla Security

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (10th)

Zilla Security

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

17th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zilla Security is 1.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Iwegbue Godspower Isioma

Cyber Security Analyst at Platview Technologies

Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)

The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.

Read full review

Hubert Hopkins

IT Compliance Analyst at The Baldwin Group

Reasonably priced, responsive support, and easy to implement access reviews

There is still no automated way to de-provision access due to a review completion, but they are getting there in terms of making it unified. Right now it is just a one-way integration, importing user lists. I believe they working on it. I can pull a user list in, but when I do a review, the results get sent to a ticket which requires a person to execute. As a result of the review, there is no automation for the removal of access. They are going there, and the next step is to continue to streamline the process operationally and resource-wise. The review process is great. The scope for improvement is more at the results end. It would be great if it could systematically communicate with that end system and remove the requested access automatically.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."

"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."

"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."

"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."

"We had these spreadsheets all over the place, but now we have a library of evidence to consult when needed. Zilla keeps everything in one place. It's not scattered all over anymore."

"I enjoy the ease of setup and creation of a review. Being a user of the tool or kind of an admin of the tool, the ease of setup of an access review is valuable."

Cons

"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."

"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."

"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."

"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."

"Maybe this is coming with their AI module, but I would like to see a feature that performs baseline analysis of permissions that may not fit into a role, and it attempts to group them into a role. We've run into problems with applications where someone has not created a role but assigned ad hoc permissions to a user. We still need to do some manual work to identify the group that the user belongs to. It would be amazing to have Zilla streamline that."

"There is still no automated way to de-provision access as a result of a review, but they are getting there in terms of making it unified. They are getting closer to that."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."

"It's worth the money."

"It has been fair because we have been in from the beginning or close to the beginning. I know it is not truly an identity access management system yet, but its price was one of the appealing factors for us to purchase it at the time. It was reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Security Firm

29%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Entrust IdentityGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Entrust IdentityGuard?

I use it for an extra layer of security, that is two-factor authentication (2FA).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Entrust IdentityGuard?

I would recommend it. I've used it for three years now, and I'm very happy with it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zilla Security?

It has been fair because we have been in from the beginning or close to the beginning. I know it is not truly an identity access management system yet, but its price was one of the appealing factor...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zilla Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zilla Security?

We use the tool for access reviews. It is mainly for our regulatory SOX compliance. That was the main use case, and why we purchased Zilla back at the end of 2021.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 23% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 19% of the time

Venafi vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 16% of the time

Entrust Identity Essentials vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Zilla Security

Compared 64% of the time

Veza vs Zilla Security

Compared 22% of the time

Lumos vs Zilla Security

Compared 14% of the time

More Zilla Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise

April 2025

Download Entrust Identity Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity Management (IM)

April 2025

Download Zilla Security product report

Also Known As

IdentityGuard

No data available

Overview

Identity Enterprise is an integrated IAM platform that supports a full suite of workforce, consumer, and citizen use cases. Ideally suited for high-assurance applications that require a Zero Trust approach for thousands or millions of users, Identity Enterprise can be deployed on-premises.

Entrust Datacard

Zilla enables you to maintain a secure and compliant posture for identity and access across your attack surface.
We bring all your digital services into one unified identity security solution – even your apps with no security APIs. We put you in control and prevent identity and access breaches.
Zilla enables you to maintain a secure and compliant posture for identity and access across your attack surface.
We bring all your digital services into one unified identity security solution – even your apps with no security APIs. We put you in control and prevent identity and access breaches.

Zilla Security

Sample Customers

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Zilla Security

April 2025

Free Report: Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Zilla Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Zilla Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Zilla Security report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.