Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Elastic Search vs TIBCO Spotfire comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Search
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Indexing and Search (1st), Cloud Data Integration (12th), Search as a Service (1st), Vector Databases (1st)
TIBCO Spotfire
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (14th)
 

Featured Reviews

Randy Sanchez - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 30, 2023
Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts
The most valuable features are its user-friendly interface and seamless navigation. The abundance of tutorials and helpful mocktails significantly contributed to the ease of managing the system. The user interface stood out for its accessibility, making it straightforward to perform tasks and queries. The availability of resources, such as tutorials and mocktails, not only facilitated my learning process but also enhanced the overall usability of Elastic Search. Additionally, the ability to seamlessly integrate Elastic agents into our system not only enhanced our overall efficiency but also facilitated smooth integration with the cloud. The versatility of adding Elastic agents and leveraging the source components provided a comprehensive solution for managing and optimizing our system.
RO
Apr 18, 2024
Empowers us to extract insights and provide valuable business analytics to support decision-making within our organization
We use TIBCO Spotfire for business intelligence purposes, to analyze data, and to generate reports for our business teams. It empowers us to extract insights and provide valuable business analytics to support decision-making within our organization TIBCO Spotfire is easy to use. We initiated…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Data indexing of historical data is the most beneficial feature of the product."
"The AI-based attribute tagging is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are the data store and the X-pack extension."
"The search speed is most valuable and important."
"There's lots of processing power. You can actually just add machines to get more performance if you need to. It's pretty flexible and very easy to add another log. It's not like 'oh, no, it's going to be so much extra data'. That's not a problem for the machine. It can handle it."
"I appreciate that Elastic Enterprise Search is easy to use and that we have people on our team who are able to manage it effectively."
"The product is scalable with good performance."
"You have dashboards, it is visual, there are maps, you can create canvases. It's more visual than anything that I've ever used."
"R and automation services."
"It’s stable and straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the map visuals that help us connect to the geo-specialized data which is more advanced than other solutions."
"We particularly like the data angling feature of this solution. This gives us the ability to work on data transformations, join files, and carry out other data preparation tasks all in a single tool."
"It's scalable."
"Live Query data on demand, R and Python integration, and the ability to write HTML and JavaScript text areas are all valuable features."
"The solution is an affordable one."
"Data discovery is very simple."
 

Cons

"The metadata gets stored along with indexes and isn't queryable."
"It was not possible to use authentication three years back. You needed to buy the product's services for authentication."
"The GUI is the part of the program which has the most room for improvement."
"Dashboards could be more flexible, and it would be nice to provide more drill-down capabilities."
"This product could be improved with additional security, and the addition of support for machine learning devices."
"Performance improvement could come from skipping background refresh on search idle shards (which is already being addressed in the upcoming seventh version)."
"It should be easier to use. It has been getting better because many functions are pre-defined, but it still needs improvement."
"Elastic Search needs to improve authentication. It also needs to work on the Kibana visualization dashboard."
"The solution might be generic."
"The initial setup can be difficult."
"The handling and consumption of realtime data could be improved."
"The design of the UI could be improved."
"The number of charts available out of the box in Spotfire can be enhanced."
"We would like to see some development in the visualization aspect of this solution, as they can currently only be configured in the cloud, which limits us to one endpoint. It would be helpful if this could be integrated with other tools."
"We encountered difficulties connecting the special data sets, as the post data set did not contain any shared columns, making it difficult to establish a connection between the data sets."
"The data compression has room for improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It can be expensive."
"We are paying $1,500 a month to use the solution. If you want to have endpoint protection you need to pay more."
"It can move from $10,000 US Dollars per year to any price based on how powerful you need the searches to be and the capacity in terms of storage and process."
"Although the ELK Elasticsearch software is open-source, we buy the hardware."
"ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
"The basic license is free, but it comes with a lot of features that aren't free. With a gold license, we get active directory integration. With a platinum license, we get alerting."
"The price of Elasticsearch is fair. It is a more expensive solution, like QRadar. The price for Elasticsearch is not much more than other solutions we have."
"To access all the features available you require both the open source license and the production license."
"The ROI is nearly impossible to calculate."
"In comparison to other solutions such as IBM Cognos, TIBCO Spotfire is more affordable."
"The solution is affordable one."
"The price-point for this solution is negotiable depending on usage levels."
"This product carries a monthly licensing charge, with the amount depending on the features that are to be included. This costs also covers the use of technical support."
"The cost of TIBCO Spotfire could improve. It should be less expensive. It's the most expensive visualization tool in our company."
"The cost is a few hundred dollars per user per year."
"The pricing seems competitive and reasonable. The value delivered by the product far exceeds the cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ELK Elasticsearch?
Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time anal...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ELK Elasticsearch?
I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive. It is not very costly, but it is not cheap either.
What needs improvement with ELK Elasticsearch?
Scalability and ROI are the areas they have to improve. Their license terms are based on the number of cores. If you increase the number of cores, it becomes very difficult to manage at a large sca...
What do you like most about TIBCO Spotfire?
TIBCO Spotfire is easy to use. We initiated Spotfire as POC, with support from a tech team based in South Africa. While they assisted with the setup, we conducted the POC ourselves.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TIBCO Spotfire?
The solution is pricey. Most organizations might find it costly because very few are utilizing these features. We initially purchased the perpetual licensing. Additionally, there was an extra cost ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
Spotfire
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
Allergan, ASSS de Montreal, Avantium, Blue River, Bank of Montreal, Citibank, FrieslandCampina, Hellmann Logistics, Merck, Novartis
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Search vs. TIBCO Spotfire and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.