Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs IBM Rational Test Workbench comparison

Digital.ai and IBM are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Digital.ai is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #36. Digital.ai holds a 0.4% mindshare in TAt, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Digital.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Read 3 Digital.ai Continuous Testing reviews

290 Views
202 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

130 Views
71 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

IBM Rational Test Workbench and Digital.ai Continuous Testing are competing products in the software testing industry, with Digital.ai Continuous Testing having the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and higher perceived value.

Features: IBM Rational Test Workbench features comprehensive integration capabilities, automation for streamlining workflows, and strong support for complex environments. Digital.ai Continuous Testing offers robust real-time analytics, cross-platform testing capabilities, and detailed insights for broad compatibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital.ai Continuous Testing provides seamless integration with flexibility in deployment, emphasizing efficiency in getting started along with responsive customer support. IBM Rational Test Workbench offers a structured deployment model with strong customer support, benefiting users seeking stability during initial setups.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Test Workbench has a lower initial setup cost, appealing to organizations with budget constraints. Digital.ai Continuous Testing, while potentially more costly upfront, offers a better ROI through advanced features that improve long-term testing efficiency and effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (9th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd)

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

36th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (19th), API Testing Tools (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Continuous Testing is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Alan Chiou

PM at Galaxy Software Services

Has Mobile Studio feature which can generate scripts

The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version.

Read full review

reviewer1513668

IT Specialist, ITE at a government with 10,001+ employees

Good reporting and interface, but supports limited types of protocols and requires low-level script editing

It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."

"The most useful feature for me is Mobile Studio. It has a UI where I can click on elements, and it generates a script for me. Mobile Studio can generate code from testing steps. I'm using Python with it."

"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench."

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."

Cons

"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

"The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version."

"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."

"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."

"The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker."

"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."

"It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

21%

Retailer

11%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

I'm using Digital.ai Continuous Testing to create and test a mobile application. We're developing and testing a mobile app.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 47% of the time

Perfecto vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 30% of the time

LambdaTest vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 23% of the time

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Competitors

ReadyAPI Test vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 100% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Workbench Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ConformIQ Creator vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing

April 2025

Download Digital.ai Continuous Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

April 2025

Download IBM Rational Test Workbench product report

Also Known As

Experitest Seetest, Experitest

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server

Overview

Experitest's continuous testing solutions enable enterprises to reduce risk and provide their customers satisfying, error-free experiences across all devices and browsers. They seamlessly integrate with best-in-class tools throughout the DevOps pipeline allowing organizations to rapidly deliver highly protected, quality applications at-speed and at-scale.

Digital.ai

IBM Rational Test Workbench provides a comprehensive test automation solution for mobile applications, regression testing, integration technologies and performance and scalability testing. It helps you build intelligent and interconnected enterprise applications that can be deployed on traditional and cloud infrastructures. With Rational Test Workbench, you can significantly reduce test cycle times, moving integration testing earlier in the development lifecycle.

IBM

Sample Customers

Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee

Financial Insurance Management Corp.

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench

April 2025

Free Report: Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.