Depot vs GoCD comparison

Depot and Thoughtworks are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Depot is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0, while Thoughtworks is ranked #17 with an average rating of 6.5. Depot holds a 0.3% mindshare in BA, compared to Thoughtworks’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Depot users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Thoughtworks users who would recommend it.

Depot

Read 1 Depot review

315 Views
69 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GoCD

Read 7 GoCD reviews

1,431 Views
816 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Depot

GoCD

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Depot and GoCD based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Google, GitHub and others in Build Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,789 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Depot

Ranking in Build Automation

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GoCD

Ranking in Build Automation

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (18th), Release Automation (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Depot is 0.3%. The mindshare of GoCD is 2.4%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GoCD	2.4%
Depot	0.3%
Other	97.3%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Giovanni Nava

Senior Project Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Time savings have increased daily clients and improve revenue in my chiropractic practice

Technology is always improving, and putting new technology would be an improvement for my job. I feel fine with the actual platform. Depot is a useful tool and there is space for improvement, but I can't figure out what can be done, which is why I chose eight out of ten.

Read full review

Nishant Narayan Singh

DevOps Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Simplifies the pipeline process, but the access control system needs enhancement

One area of product improvement is the access control system. It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified. The folder structure is another aspect that could be enhanced, as all jobs are displayed on a single page without the clear organization seen in Jenkins. Implementing a more structured approach to organizing jobs would improve user experience. AI could simplify job creation. For example, instead of manually editing pipelines as code, an AI tool could allow users to input variables and automatically generate the required jobs. It would help reduce human errors, such as issues that arise from incorrect edits in large code files.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Depot has positively impacted my organization in an awesome way, and the fact that I can save time gives me the possibility to have more clients during the day, saving at least 20% each day because of Depot."

"The UI is colorful."

"It has a user-friendly interface, which for free and open-source tools, the UI is really amazing and simple."

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."

"GoCD's open-source nature is valuable."

"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."

"After we switched to GO, each team can set-up their own delivery pipeline and run it themselves."

"In terms of value added it has more than achieved everything we wanted from it and more."

Cons

"Depot is a useful tool and there is space for improvement, but I can't figure out what can be done, which is why I chose eight out of ten."

"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."

"User management, Documentation, Advanced GUI functionality."

"The tool must be more user-friendly."

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."

"GO doesn't come with a lot of out of the box features like other tools, don't expect that you can get it to work by clicking the NEXT button."

"It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."

"It's an open-source and free tool."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

47%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

University

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Depot?

I don't know exactly about the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Depot because my accountant follows this for me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Depot?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Depot?

I'm a freelance chiropractor and I use Depot to manage payers. It is used for shaving mainly. A lot of customers come with Depot products and we use them.

See all answers

What do you like most about GoCD?

The UI is colorful.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GoCD?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GoCD?

The solution helps us deploy microservices across multiple environments.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Bamboo vs GoCD

Compared 7% of the time

Jenkins vs GoCD

Compared 6% of the time

GitLab vs GoCD

Compared 6% of the time

Buildkite vs GoCD

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GoCD

Compared 5% of the time

More GoCD Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

March 2026

Download Depot product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

March 2026

Download GoCD product report

Also Known As

No data available

Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go

Overview

Depot is a versatile platform designed to optimize operations and improve productivity by providing efficient management tools tailored for various industries.

With Depot, businesses can benefit from a comprehensive toolkit that facilitates seamless integration and functionality. Its robust features empower companies to streamline processes, enhance collaboration, and boost efficiency across multiple departments. Depot's adaptability makes it an essential choice for businesses seeking a reliable management solution.

What are the key features of Depot?

Inventory Management: Offers real-time tracking and automation of stock levels.
Task Automation: Streamlines routine tasks to enhance productivity.
Data Analytics: Provides insightful reports for informed decision-making.
Custom Integrations: Allows seamless connectivity with other platforms.
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands with ease.

What ROI should be expected?

Cost Savings: Reduces operational costs by optimizing processes.
Time Efficiency: Minimizes downtime through effective task management.
Improved Accuracy: Enhances precision across operations with real-time data.
Enhanced Collaboration: Fosters team communication and coordination.
Increased Revenue: Drives growth with streamlined sales and distribution.

Depot's implementation varies across industries from logistics to retail, where it plays a crucial role in managing supply chains and inventory efficiently. In healthcare, Depot supports the management of medical supplies and patient data. Its adaptability encourages widespread adoption, supporting diverse operational needs with tailored configurations.

Depot

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.

Thoughtworks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Google, GitHub and others in Build Automation. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.