Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs dbt comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

dbt
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (31st)
Informatica Cloud Data Quality
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Data Quality (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

Ninad Magdum - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer-friendly and easy to use, but doesn't have many optimization options
We also use stored procedures and Talend. They are not replaced by dbt completely. We use dbt only for the transformation process. My recommendations would depend on an organization’s requirements and problems. I will recommend the tool to others. The product is developer-friendly. However, it is still dependent on the data warehouse for big data and optimization. It's just a SQL transformation tool. It doesn't have a lot of optimization options like Spark. It's a good tool for Snowflake. If it were only for Snowflake, I would have rated it an eight out of ten. However, there are other data platforms. Overall, I rate the tool a six and a half out of ten.
Mehmet SukruKaya - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved data quality significantly enhances project efficiency and effectiveness
I am not utilizing the data quality rules management part yet. We had a bad experience before Informatica Cloud Data Quality. We started a data analytics project that took more than three months of wasted time because we couldn't use the data to create the optimization model. If we have an application like Informatica Cloud Data Quality or a data quality platform, we can finish the project in less than three months. This is the on-prem data that we ingested. We don't use any cloud data that we have. For now, we are just using the on-prem data, and we don't have any integration from the data outside of the on-prem. I would recommend it to other users. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution a 9.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product is developer-friendly."
"The profiling features are much better than the on-premise version."
"The user-friendliness and performance of Informatica is quite impressive."
"One of the most valuable features of Informatica Cloud Data Quality is Master Data Management. You can write code to build your logic rules to check the quality."
"We primarily used Cloud Data Profiling to connect with Cloud Data Governance, a tool also used by Teva. This integration allowed users to access data quality results within the data governance catalog."
"I would definitely recommend Informatica Data Quality to others."
"The most beneficial feature of Informatica Cloud Data Quality is it's cloud-based."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The quality of the data improves with Informatica Cloud Data Quality."
 

Cons

"The solution must add more Python-based implementations."
"In certain domains, I am looking for material-level match features that are not customizable. The current solution requires code-writing and tweaking, while other solutions offer material-level matches."
"In the on-premises version, features like web service consumer and web service provider are available, but these functionalities are currently unavailable in the cloud edition."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The downside of Informatica Cloud Data Quality is that it requires a developer to write rules and maintain the systems. This creates a significant cost and time burden."
"I used to use this tool more but recently we have been using another tool that we feel is better because it handles spatial data. Informatica Cloud Data Quality could improve by adding the ability to handle spatial data."
"Support response time could be better."
"If a new solution has the same features and less investment, it would be worth considering."
"Some capabilities from the cloud version are not included in the on-premises version."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing is affordable."
"The licensing costs attached to the solution are pretty high, but then, with the cloud model, the prices depend on what it provides for the value of money, which I feel was very high."
"Informatica Cloud Data Quality is a costly solution."
"We pay for a yearly subscription."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
872,098 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Insurance Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for dbt?
It is cheap because dbt is open source. If you compare the pay-per-service of Dbt with the open source option you can manage. We are managing the solution, when we were acquiring service from them....
What needs improvement with dbt?
SQL statements that beyond DML, are not possible. Currently, they are not possible in Dbt. Having more features in SQL statements will support us. Another issue is the terms of data ingestion becau...
What is your primary use case for dbt?
We use the solution to deal with data transformations inside different organizations.
What do you like most about Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
The profiling features are much better than the on-premise version.
What needs improvement with Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
I think it would be very useful to have the same features on the data center version available on the cloud version. I remember when I used it, there was some limitation in one of the data quality ...
What is your primary use case for Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
I worked on a project where we had to use these tools to execute the data quality requirements from assessment perspectives to scorecards and similar tasks. I haven't used any other tools, so I can...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Cloud Data Quality Radar
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Freddie Mac, Rabobank
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Ataccama and others in Data Quality. Updated: October 2025.
872,098 professionals have used our research since 2012.