We performed a comparison between Cymulate and Trend Vision One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day."
"The reporting capabilities are very good."
"The solution is stable."
"The integration is also nice because there are many external tools that we can connect to the platform, such as configuration management tools. Because the platform is integrated, I can manage almost the whole company across our global organization."
"The setup is fairly simple."
"I like that it is a comprehensive security solution with a lot of features. You can say XDR is an end-to-end security solution with endpoint security. It includes all your servers, networks, and other devices. The endpoint security solution does not cover this. Plus, machine learning and features like that are the main things in XDR solutions."
"The search features help us try to correlate information and identify any suspicious activity."
"I'm satisfied with the level of coverage. The policies have been very useful and detailed."
"Scaling is not a problem at all."
"We've found the pricing to be reasonable."
"Detections could be improved."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The product must provide consultancy for initial setup."
"The reporting process requires significant improvement as it often takes longer than expected and the quality is lacking."
"A room for improvement in Trend Micro XDR is more visibility into the alerts. We do get alerts from the solution, but when we are away, we need to have more visibility."
"The automation capabilities on-premises could be improved, as we currently have to manually activate servers and push policies."
"The support has been delayed at times."
"There isn't a lot I'd do to change it. The web interface could be improved to sort of make it a little easier to manage multiple clients out of one location. It could also be made a bit easier to sort of manage the licensing side of it."
"They should increase their potential for third-party integrations."
"The area for improvement is mobile security. We have just finished a proof of concept for Zero Trust Secure Access. We withdrew from this PoC because it does not have that many points for proxy across Europe. Our organization is across Europe... At this time, they are only located in Germany and the UK."
"Reporting could be a little bit better. They are working on it, and it is getting better."
"Results were delayed."
Cymulate is ranked 7th in Attack Surface Management (ASM) with 2 reviews while Trend Vision One is ranked 3rd in Attack Surface Management (ASM) with 42 reviews. Cymulate is rated 9.0, while Trend Vision One is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cymulate writes "An affordable solution that improves an organization’s security posture and provides excellent reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One writes "The integration of toolsets is key, enabling automation, and vendor has been tremendous partner for us". Cymulate is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, XM Cyber, SafeBreach and AttackIQ, whereas Trend Vision One is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender XDR, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Trend Micro Apex One and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our Cymulate vs. Trend Vision One report.
See our list of best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.