We performed a comparison between Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, ESET and others in Anti-Malware Tools."The solution's most valuable feature is its AI detection algorithm part, which helps and is Cybereason's way of detecting the unknown, not just the signature-based threats."
"I like that Defender is integrated and doesn't have a third-party payload trying to advertise subscription renewal."
"This software is easy to use."
"The antivirus features are very useful."
"We can run the virus scan across our entire environment."
"The detection features are valuable, as is the fact that it is easier to port these logs into Sentinel. That is also useful for us. It is more comprehensive."
"It is easy to install and use requiring little maintenance but applying updates."
"Technical support is good."
"The solution has good performance, I have not seen a problem."
"Integrating other tools is sometimes an issue when using Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus."
"Its interface can be improved a little bit. We would like to have some sort of centralization. It should have something like a central server that is managing all the other clients. There are solutions from Kaspersky or ESET NOD32 that are really doing this kind of thing currently. We would like to see something similar from Microsoft."
"The integration and effectiveness of email security could be better. It's already built-in to the solution and checks emails, scans the links they contain etc."
"It can get a bit laggy sometimes. Other than that, we don't have any issues. They constantly tweak it and fix it up based on users' feedback. It has improved a lot over the past four years. Defender for Endpoint never really used to be a good endpoint security solution, but over the past couple of years, Microsoft has invested heavily in it. So, it has come a long way in all aspects of endpoint security. If they want to make it better, they should just continue investing in the current path of what they've been doing over the past couple of years."
"I would like to see better integration with their other security products to give better visibility from a higher level."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint can use more advertising to promote their features."
"Its detection is not as quick. There should also be more frequent updates."
"I had some cases a while back and told an agent my issue. When I called the next day, I had to explain everything again to a different person, so I found it annoying to repeat myself all over."
"The interface could be improved."
More Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus is ranked 21st in Anti-Malware Tools with 1 review while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 1st in Anti-Malware Tools with 182 reviews. Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus writes "With great technical support and reasonable scalability options, the tool efficiently detects unknown threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Eliminates the need to look at multiple dashboards by automatically providing one XDR dashboard to show the security score of each subscription". Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus is most compared with ESET PROTECT Enterprise, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, Intercept X Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
