We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has drastically reduced the attack surface for local administrative rights and the chance of escalation of privilege. We've removed, at this point, close to 98 percent of the local administrative accounts on workstations. If there were an incident, it would stop at that point and we'd be able to know."
"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."
"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."
"I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."
"This is the number one product for privilege account security."
"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."
"Users can scale the solution."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its ability to reset passwords every time that it is needed or periodically."
"It has a very simple like multi-tenancy option and scalability is outstanding."
"The initial setup is straightforward, not complex."
"I have found many of the features to be useful."
"The product is easy to use."
"The package of protection that it provides is useful. It has antivirus, malware protection, VPN, and a whole bunch of other features."
"It's easy to use and it's very powerful. It offers nice endpoint protection."
"We like the management of the ePO, and we like the management console."
"The user behavioral analysis feature is great."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is not suitable for the current situation because when you compare it to OTP, OTP is the strongest password solution. You can use it as a one-time password, but you have to log into the password manager itself and if you don't change your password, it will be the weakest link in the security. In OTP, you don't have that weakest link."
"The solution can be complex to use at times."
"We have had some major issues with the tool, but we have worked with the R&D teams and we have worked with support. There is room for improvement, especially on response times. But they're working on it and they're doing the best they can."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a perfect solution, but CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for Linux has many issues. Another area for improvement in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, specifically for Windows, is that there's no way for you to check credential theft from a text file, such as a notepad file."
"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."
"The tool should be more user-friendly."
"Users can just install software into their computers. We need some sort of application control system that, if there are any pieces of software that are not whitelisted, then the solution could flag it or maybe alert the administers. That would be very helpful."
"The price of the solution is high in Asia."
"Trellix lacked email protection when it was a McAfee product. They added this feature during the merger with FireEye, but it hasn't been fully integrated. The core features will be integrated into the next release. FireEye has several solutions for EDR and sandboxing."
"There are certain shortcomings in the features concerning DLP in Trellix, where certain additions must be made in the future."
"There is room to improve with scalability."
"We’re facing remote installation issues sometimes:"
"It would be helpful if the controlling of connections coming to the PC could be done from McAfee's side so that we can block those connections."
"An area in need of improvement involves the overview, which usually does not enable one to get the value in reports."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 26 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 12th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 94 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and BigFix, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.