CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs StrongDM comparison

CyberArk and StrongDM are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. CyberArk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4, while StrongDM is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.0. CyberArk holds a 3.6% mindshare in PAM, compared to StrongDM’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of StrongDM users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Read 36 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

1,307 Views
914 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

StrongDM

Read 2 StrongDM reviews

240 Views
164 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

StrongDM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and StrongDM compete in cybersecurity by securing access to sensitive resources. CyberArk is perceived to reduce security risks effectively through privilege management, while StrongDM is noted for its access management features that often lead to it being considered a superior choice.

Features: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager provides granular privilege management, robust policy controls, and automated privilege elevation. StrongDM offers seamless access to databases and servers, enhanced visibility, and control over infrastructure access, placing a significant emphasis on integrated infrastructure access.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager features a straightforward but time-consuming deployment model due to comprehensive setup needs, paired with responsive and knowledgeable customer service. StrongDM's cloud-native model facilitates rapid integration and adaptability, with efficient customer support offering direct query resolution.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager involves a substantial initial investment, yielding long-term returns through security risk reduction and compliance facilitation, yet its pricing model is less flexible. StrongDM presents a more cost-effective upfront option, with considerable ROI from streamlined access management, appealing to businesses seeking scalable solutions with predictable costs.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (4th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (5th), Ransomware Protection (7th)

StrongDM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Access Management (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 3.6%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StrongDM is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan

Lead Consultant at Aujas Networks Pvt Ltd

Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights

There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.

Read full review

reviewer2589615

Senior Data Engineer at a non-profit with 1,001-5,000 employees

Seamlessly manage cloud access with enhanced security features

I was part of the team managing the infrastructure for a small startup company. We used StrongDM to provide access to cloud private networks, control user access to databases, hosts through SSH, and Kubernetes resources StrongDM was able to replace the combination of different products we…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is entirely cloud-based, so no further upkeep is required."

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."

"The product is very flexible"

"I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to control users with admin rights. Even if developers and senior folks maintain their admin rights, we can still manage their activities."

"The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."

"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

"StrongDM replaced the puzzle of different solutions with one single product, which made managing resources more efficient."

"We primarily used StrongDM for access to resources on private networks like EC2 machines, Kubernetes clusters, and various databases."

"All of the logging is handled for us, including for auditing purposes. Looking through the audit logs is not a painful experience."

Cons

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent."

"The price of the solution should improve."

"It is hard to deal with technical support if you are not certified."

"The solution can be complex to use at times."

"My recommendation for improvement is to add functionality for when users request access to an application. There's a pop-up UI, but it's not very customizable. I suggest creating a UI where we can write scripts or use SDKs to enhance it. This could automatically create tickets in a system like ServiceNow when users request an application. If a manager approves, we could automatically push policies to those users."

"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."

"They need much better integration with Azure AD."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

"We've had a few issues with the stability of this product in the past."

"It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Although I do not deal directly with the pricing, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions. However, it offers beneficial features."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers."

"The tool is a bit pricey compared to its competitors. My company does work with competitors, but I don't have hands-on experience with other software. I've just done some comparisons."

"The professional services for one eight-hour day would be $1,800."

"It's not at the lower end of the market. I think the price is reasonable considering the quality it delivers. It is a top-notch solution at a fair price point."

"Pricing depends on how many devices you use. Right now, on-premise, it costs us a little, but it's worth it. It seems like the cloud solution is much more expensive. We got this solution one year ago, and it's like we bought the solution, and now they are not going to support it on-premise anymore. We are in the implementation phase, and we missed this, and we already paid for the licenses. This is wasted time from my perspective, and CyberArk should be more customer-friendly."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

"The licensing is per user per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

I've received feedback that the pricing is high, however, for me, the value it brings is worth the cost. It's really one of the best solutions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StrongDM?

The leadership chose StrongDM after comparative research, which suggests economic benefits. It was mentioned that while the product is rapidly gaining features, it might become cost-prohibitive for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with StrongDM?

It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases. Also, documentation s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for StrongDM?

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 25% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 15% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 14% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs StrongDM

Compared 65% of the time

KeeperPAM vs StrongDM

Compared 18% of the time

Teleport vs StrongDM

Compared 17% of the time

More StrongDM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

April 2025

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report

Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

April 2025

Download StrongDM product report

Also Known As

Viewfinity

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk

StrongDM is a centralized access management solution designed to streamline and secure your organizational infrastructure, offering robust features for data protection and operational efficiency.

StrongDM addresses the critical need for secure and efficient access management within an organization's infrastructure. It offers a comprehensive suite of features that ensures both security and seamless connectivity for users. From controlling access to databases and cloud environments to auditing and managing user activity, StrongDM meets the demands of modern, tech-savvy organizations. Its integration capabilities and detailed logging features make it an essential tool for those looking to maintain rigorous security standards.

What are the key features of StrongDM?

Unified Access Management: Consolidates access to databases, servers, and cloud environments, simplifying user management.
Audit Logging: Provides detailed audit logs for all user activity, enhancing security and compliance monitoring.
Role-Based Access Control: Allows granular access control based on user roles, ensuring only authorized personnel can access sensitive information.
Real-Time Monitoring: Offers real-time session monitoring, delivering insights into user activity and potential security risks.
Integrations: Seamlessly integrates with various IT infrastructure and security tools, improving operational efficiency.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Reviews frequently highlight StrongDM's ability to significantly improve organizational security through robust access controls and detailed logging.
Operational Efficiency: Users often note increased operational efficiency due to streamlined access management processes.
Compliance Support: Many reviews point out StrongDM\'s audit and compliance features that help with regulatory requirements.
User Convenience: Ease of use and quick deployment are common benefits that users appreciate.
Scalability: Reviewers often emphasize StrongDM’s capability to scale with growing organizational needs.

StrongDM is implemented across various industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where security and compliance are critical. In finance, for instance, it aids in maintaining rigorous compliance requirements by providing detailed audit trails. In healthcare, StrongDM ensures that sensitive patient data is securely accessed and managed. Technology companies leverage StrongDM to simplify the management of their diverse and complex IT environments, ensuring secure and efficient operations.

StrongDM

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM

April 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.