CucumberStudio and OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing compete in the application testing category. OpenText stands out due to its comprehensive security features, while CucumberStudio excels in behavior-driven development support.
Features: CucumberStudio integrates seamlessly with behavior-driven development tools and supports collaborative test automation. It offers integration with JIRA for enhanced project management and supports code integrations and API calls. OpenText provides comprehensive vulnerability scanning, advanced security features, and effective integration with security protocols for robust security analyses.
Room for Improvement: CucumberStudio could enhance its reporting capabilities and expand its integration options with more project management tools. Its user interface might benefit from additional customization features, and improving real-time collaboration could be beneficial. OpenText could improve its user interface for a more intuitive experience, enhance the speed of comprehensive scans, and provide more detailed documentation for new users to ease the learning curve.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CucumberStudio offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment tailored for test automation teams, with prompt and responsive customer support. OpenText provides both cloud and on-premises options, adaptable for various security needs, with comprehensive support linked to security insights.
Pricing and ROI: CucumberStudio is generally more budget-friendly, offering high ROI through its agile and collaborative features. OpenText, though higher in price, justifies its ROI with extensive security measures and compliance offerings, providing value in environments requiring thorough security analysis.
Formerly HipTest: CucumberStudio is the leading collaboration platform for BDD - an easy-to-use tool to define ideas, test code, and learn in production from real-time insight.
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.
This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.
What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.
We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
