CucumberStudio and OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing compete in the testing domain. OpenText has the upper hand due to its comprehensive security features.
Features: CucumberStudio excels in creating a collaborative testing environment, supporting seamless script integration and enhancing team efficiency with real-time collaboration. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing provides advanced security testing with in-depth vulnerability scanning, a comprehensive reporting suite, and integration with Fortify for code analysis.
Room for Improvement: CucumberStudio could improve in handling large test datasets, enhance its UI for more intuitive navigation, and expand integration capabilities with other third-party tools. OpenText may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, improving its user interface to be more intuitive, and reducing false positives in vulnerability detection.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CucumberStudio offers an easy deployment process backed by highly responsive customer service. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing's deployment can be complex, but the robust customer support helps address these challenges effectively.
Pricing and ROI: CucumberStudio's lower initial costs and faster ROI are attractive for teams focused on collaboration and cost-efficiency. In contrast, OpenText requires a higher initial investment, offering a substantial ROI for businesses in need of thorough security assessments in security-critical scenarios.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing | 17.7% |
| CucumberStudio | 0.5% |
| Other | 81.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
Formerly HipTest: CucumberStudio is the leading collaboration platform for BDD - an easy-to-use tool to define ideas, test code, and learn in production from real-time insight.
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.
This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.
What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.
We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
