CouchDB vs ScyllaDB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
576 views|544 comparisons
ScyllaDB Logo
2,487 views|1,529 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CouchDB and ScyllaDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Pranv Kumar
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I believe that there is a yearly licensing cost and that it's expensive."
  • More ScyllaDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively.
    Top Answer:I believe that there is a yearly licensing cost and that it's expensive.
    Top Answer:It has just been a month or so for me with Scylla. The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved. Improvement of documentation is needed considering that I work… more »
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    576
    Comparisons
    544
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    6th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    2,487
    Comparisons
    1,529
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    577
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Couchbase logo
    Compared 28% of the time.
    MongoDB logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    Apache HBase logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Cassandra logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Neo4j Graph Database logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    MongoDB logo
    Compared 39% of the time.
    Cassandra logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Couchbase logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Apache HBase logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview
    Apache CouchDB is open source database software that focuses on ease of use and having a scalable architecture. It has a document-oriented NoSQL database architecture and is implemented in the concurrency-oriented language Erlang; it uses JSON to store data, JavaScript as its query language using MapReduce, and HTTP for an API.

    ScyllaDB is an open-source, distributed NoSQL wide-column datastore (a highly scalable NoSQL database), known for its compatibility with Apache Cassandra, and for supporting the same protocols as Cassandra (CQL and Thrift) and the same file formats (SSTable). ScyllaDB is designed for high throughput and low latency, making it suitable for data-intensive applications. Its architecture allows it to deliver remarkable performance on a massive scale, utilizing modern multi-core servers to their fullest potential​

    ScyllaDB utilizes a similar architecture, data format, and query language as Apache Cassandra, providing compatibility while dramatically improving speed and scalability.

    The key advantages of ScyllaDB include its rewritten C++ implementation that eliminates Cassandra's expensive Java garbage collection pauses, built-in caching for fast access to frequently used data, and shard-aware drivers for direct routing of requests. This enables it to fully leverage modern multi-core servers for massive parallelism. The community is active and the latest major release, ScyllaDB Enterprise 2023.1.0 LTS, incorporates over 5,000 code commits focused on enhancing capabilities.

    ScyllaDB supports wide-column data modeling for fast read performance at scale. It includes integrated monitoring and management tools to track database health and performance. For organizations looking to boost speed and reduce costs for NoSQL workloads, ScyllaDB offers a drop-in replacement for Cassandra that delivers lower latency, higher throughput, and increased scalability with fewer nodes. Its seamless migration path makes switching from Cassandra seamless, requiring minimal code changes.

    Sample Customers
    Verizon, Dimagi Inc., Apple, Sinclair Broadcast Group, Perspecta
    IBM, Investing.com, mParticle, Comcast, GE, Fanatics, Ola, CERN, adgear, Samsung
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Educational Organization11%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Educational Organization7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    NoSQL Databases
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CouchDB is ranked 13th in NoSQL Databases while ScyllaDB is ranked 6th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. CouchDB is rated 0.0, while ScyllaDB is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScyllaDB writes "A solution that offers good performance and flexibility to its users". CouchDB is most compared with Couchbase, MongoDB, Apache HBase, Cassandra and Neo4j Graph Database, whereas ScyllaDB is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Couchbase, Apache HBase and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop.

    See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.