We performed a comparison between Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] and Juniper SRX Series Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Netgate, Fortinet, OPNsense and others in Firewalls."The main reason why I purchased the particular unit was that it had good reviews and what other people were saying as far as its completeness and its leading capabilities in terms of endpoint security was very good."
"Fortinet FortiGate has many valuable features, such as IDS, and intrusion detection. It has security features that are in part with the technologies that are available in the market."
"The SD-WAN function is very developed. It has SD-WAN functionality with security features in one device. We can manage from one single console SD-WAN and the security policy."
"Easy to implement, and it is also reliable."
"I like Fortinet FortiGate's antispam filter, SPN, and clustering features."
"It has improved our organization with control data."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"From the firewall perspective, the rules and policies are very sufficient and easy to use."
"This solution is user-friendly."
"The ports are really versatile for their application and don't always have to be used for the purpose for which they were made."
"The GUI is simple to use."
"When compared to Palo Alto, Juniper is a better choice when it comes to the enterprise network and connectivity."
"Security policies in combination with zones: It is very easy to organize the security polices in a logical structure."
"Juniper has the "recovery safety feature", so if you perform a "commit confirmed" and the new configuration disconnects you. then there is no "confirmed" command with X mins (default = 10 mins). It automatically reverts (recovers) to the previous configuration. This is handy for when you do not want to make that trip down range just to reboot a router."
"The most valuable feature is robustness."
"Troubleshooting with the solution is quite easy. If you compare the process to, for example, Fortigate, Juniper is much easier."
"The IPS functionality of Juniper SRX is useful in the telecom industry."
"The security of Fortinet FortiGate could improve."
"For the migration, everyone has a firewall in use and I am selling Fortinet. Typically, I am replacing another firewall. Previously, there was a tool available to convert configurations from one firewall, such as Palo Alto, to Fortinet, but this tool is no longer free. If it could be made free again, it would be very beneficial."
"As far as wanting more scalability or things in the network diagram, it's going to cost you."
"The setup is pretty complex and not easy to implement."
"The license renewal process, annual renewal price, and the web application firewall features should be improved."
"Performance and technical support are the main issues with this solution."
"We sometimes have issues with FortiGate's routing table in the latest firmware update. We had to downgrade the device because our customers complained about bugs."
"I would like to have logs, monitoring, and reporting for a month without extra fees."
"I haven't seen any feature that will allow me direct authentication for a VPN solution."
"The CLI is verbose. You have to say a lot to do a little. I don't like that part of it. Cisco's command syntax seems to be a good bit more concise. When you're trying to get something done, you don't want to have to type a bunch."
"While the GUI is pretty good on the Juniper side, there can still be tweaks made to it that will make it even better."
"The Juniper product has to improve in terms of innovation."
"The product only has basic features."
"The solution could cost less. It's a bit expensive right now."
"This solution needs to update for "Next Generation" needs."
"IPS is one that I would definitely want to be improved. I would also like SSL VPN to be integrated."
"Improvements can be made to the GUI. The GUI can be improved by creating policies to handle IPS requirements. The configuration should be a one-step process. This would make it easier to complete the setup to register the time of operation."
Earn 20 points
Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Firewalls while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is ranked 18th in Firewalls with 86 reviews. Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] writes "User-Friendly, improves security, and gives me more control over my VoIP". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper SRX Series Firewall writes "Highly scalable, user-friendly UI, and easy to maintain". Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Juniper SRX Series Firewall is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Netgate pfSense, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Check Point NGFW.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors and best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.