Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Comindware Tracker vs TIBCO iProcess Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Comindware Tracker
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
44th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (42nd)
TIBCO iProcess Suite
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
39th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Comindware Tracker is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO iProcess Suite is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
TIBCO iProcess Suite0.6%
Comindware Tracker0.3%
Other99.1%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.
SA
An easy-to-use solution with great integration
It involves a lot of investment. The learning curve is not similar to other products, like K2. Regarding the user interface, I have to access workflows and define and manage the processes on the variant of a Windows application, which is not accessible if you don't have access from the client to install it on the workstation. And most of the solutions we're currently evaluating are web-based. Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing. It has lots of elements. It's not user-intuitive compared to other products. Other than that, the licensing model is our main concern.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day.​"
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
 

Cons

"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"This solution has a very lost cost."
"The price is so reasonable."
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
"Great value for the money."
"The price could definitely be lower."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
iProcess Suite
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Delta Air Lines, Detroit Water and Sewerage, DVLA, E-Plus, FedEx, Geisinger Health System, ING Turkey, Kempen & Co., KPN, LCL, Merck, Merial
Find out what your peers are saying about Comindware Tracker vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.