Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Comindware Tracker vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Comindware Tracker
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
46th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (41st)
Interfacing Technologies En...
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
35th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (29th), GRC (21st), Quality Management Software (18th), Document Management Software (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Comindware Tracker is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.
SantoshKulkarni1 - PeerSpot reviewer
A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities
I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day.​"
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"Low code development."
"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."
"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."
 

Cons

"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."
"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"Great value for the money."
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"This solution has a very lost cost."
"The price is so reasonable."
"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?
One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processe...
What needs improvement with Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?
While we have yet to explore the tool's capabilities fully, I can't think of any immediate drawbacks. However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights ...
What is your primary use case for Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?
We use the solution for finance processes, specifically for accounts payable and accounts receivable.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Enterprise Process Center
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer S.p.A., KPMG, Royal Australian Air, Orange
Find out what your peers are saying about Comindware Tracker vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.