Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Comindware Tracker vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

Comindware and IBM are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Comindware is ranked #41, while IBM is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0. Comindware holds a 0.2% mindshare in PA, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Comindware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Comindware Tracker
Read 15 Comindware Tracker reviews
  • 145 Views
  • 30 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Read 5 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews
  • 172 Views
  • 39 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and Comindware Tracker are competing in business process management solutions. IBM stands out in complex integrations, while Comindware is favored for its flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS offers advanced business process modeling, robust integration, and sophisticated analytics. Comindware Tracker is notable for its flexibility, seamless workflow automation, and easy customization without extensive coding.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could improve its user interface, reduce deployment complexity, and offer more affordable licensing options. Comindware Tracker can enhance analytics capabilities, provide more enterprise-level integration features, and improve scalability for larger deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comindware Tracker offers quick deployment with its cloud-based solution and is recognized for intuitive support. IBM WebSphere BPMS requires longer deployment due to complex configurations but provides extensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS requires a higher initial investment, suitable for large-scale implementations with substantial ROI. Comindware Tracker is competitively priced, offering a lower initial cost with faster ROI through its flexible pricing structure.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Comindware Tracker
Ranking in Process Automation
41st
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (50th)
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Ranking in Process Automation
33rd
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Comindware Tracker is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

SS
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.
Read full review
ST
Systematic role management and flexible integration improve efficiency, but low-code capabilities and setup complexity need addressing
The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems. The critical component is the authorization within the workflow assignment, which is an attractive aspect of this tool. It has helped us in systematic role management within the workflow. Additionally, it offers flexible integration capabilities facilitating front-end and back-end separation practices, allowing for technologies like Angular and Spring Boot ( /products/spring-boot-reviews ).
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."
"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."
"Low code development."
More Comindware Tracker pros
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."
 

Cons

"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
More Comindware Tracker cons
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"The price is so reasonable."
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"This solution has a very lost cost."
"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
"Great value for the money."
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?
There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler. The tool currently involves a complex setup requirement, and having...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?
We use IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) internally in the bank for process automation and management. Our IT department self-builds different systems to serve various use...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?
I recommend IBM WebSphere BPMS for large enterprises concerned with total system management. It is not ideal for SMB due to its complexity and the need for significant IT resources. I rate it seven...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Comindware Tracker
June 2025
Comindware Tracker reportDownload Comindware Tracker product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere BPMS
June 2025
IBM WebSphere BPMS reportDownload IBM WebSphere BPMS product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
WebSphere BPMS
 

Overview

Non-coding workflow software for business process modelling and management, automation of business operations, and workflow productivity boost. Minimize dependency on IT and allows non-technical users to design, run and modify Workflows with drag-and-drop simplicity.

A wide variety of workflow management solutions have been built with Comindware Tracker across all industries, departments, and workflow scenarios and brought transparency and accountability in businesses.

Key benefits of Comindware Workflow Software:

  • Quick workflow setup with no IT resource required
  • On-the-fly changes to workflows, forms, and data
  • Easy implementation thanks to the Outlook-style interface
  • Unified Document and Data Management
  • Advanced analytics and reporting for effective Workflow Management
  • Cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment

The Workflow Management system enables non-code addition and modification of workflows with no interruption to ongoing activities. It ensures quick-win implementation and reduces expenses.


Comindware
Information not available
IBM
 

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia
Buyer's Guide
Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
June 2025
Free Report: Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
Find out what your peers are saying about Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.