No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Comet vs Devo comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.8
Comet's automation reduced manual tasks, improved productivity, enhanced tracking, and saved users 10-40% time on projects.
Sentiment score
6.5
Devo enhances data analysis and threat detection cost-effectively, offering scalability, customization, and efficiency in resource allocation.
I estimate I spend around thirty to forty percent less time organizing and comparing experiment results compared to manual tracking.
student at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
Comet's return on investment is evident through significant time reduction, which is the most crucial factor I have observed.
Senior Data Scientist at Evolvision Technologies
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.1
Comet's customer service is highly rated for responsive support, clear guidance, and effective technical assistance with integration issues.
Sentiment score
6.7
Devo's customer service is praised for responsiveness and effectiveness, but some seek better documentation and clarity in ticket handling.
Comet's help center contributes significantly to building the AI-powered solution smoothly and rapidly.
Senior Data Scientist at Evolvision Technologies
I have reached out to the technical support of Comet via email only and it worked well.
Senior Data Scientist at Evolvision Technologies
I was able to troubleshoot all the issues with the online discussion forums.
student at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
I rate the customer support a nine out of ten because of their timely technical guidance and responsiveness during the deployment and troubleshooting periods.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
Both response time and support quality need attention.
Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.9
Comet efficiently manages user growth and tasks, ensuring stability and organization, with minor slowdowns in high workload scenarios.
Sentiment score
7.0
Devo's cloud-based architecture ensures impressive scalability, efficiently managing large data volumes and integrating users across regions without limitations.
Comet's scalability is excellent, as it can generate customized user-to-user browsers.
Senior Data Scientist at Evolvision Technologies
Overall, I would say Comet scales very well for academic to mid-sized machine learning projects, and it remains usable.
student at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
Comet's scalability is limited for me since I usually do only one task, and when I overload Perplexity, I hit the limit very quickly.
Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Devo is a unified SIEM solution designed to handle growing log volumes and enterprise-scale monitoring requirements.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Comet offers stability and reliability for machine learning workflows, efficiently handling experiment tracking, collaboration, and scaling with minimal issues.
Sentiment score
7.3
Devo is praised for its stability, reliable uptime, proactive support, and effective management of large deployments despite minor issues.
Many times we need to look out for different high parameterized fine-tuned models and we need to have high capabilities of browsing scenarios as well, and that is where it is lagging.
Senior Data Scientist at Evolvision Technologies
It is stable and reliable for our security operations.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
 

Room For Improvement

Comet requires UI improvements, faster performance, stronger security, better integrations, enhanced learning resources, and more competitive pricing.
Devo's Activeboards need better customization, integration, UI, and AI capabilities, while cost and usability require attention.
It needs to be smarter, utilizing better AI engines to combine data from various sources, and improve the intelligence of its answers, creativity, and document creation capabilities.
Manager & Co-Founder at Arido
Comet can be improved by being more stable and providing security features similar to Brave.
Cloud Operations Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Comet needs smarter algorithms to understand user inquiries and provide better reasoning steps.
Senior Data Scientist at Evolvision Technologies
This is particularly evident when dealing with failed login attempts and determining true versus false positives.
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
UI improvements, a simplified dashboard, or an easier reporting workflow could further improve analyst productivity.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others.
Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
 

Setup Cost

Comet provides affordable, scalable cloud-based pricing on AWS Marketplace, with unlimited team support and straightforward subscription plans.
Devo offers transparent pricing per gigabyte, with potential metadata charges, including 400-day storage and additional feature benefits.
I found it easy to understand the pricing and subscription models for faster integration.
Senior Data Scientist at Evolvision Technologies
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I am using Perplexity, the pro version, which is connected to Comet, and together they provide me with very good results at a cost of only twenty dollars, which is acceptable to me.
Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps.
Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
 

Valuable Features

Comet offers experiment tracking, AI task automation, and collaboration tools, enhancing productivity and reducing manual efforts in ML projects.
Devo impresses with real-time analytics, intuitive UI, customization, advanced alerting, cloud-native architecture, and 400 days of data retention.
The feature that keeps tabs open is great because they are updated and still on the same page where I left off, which is super helpful, allowing me to quickly return to what I was working on.
Manager & Co-Founder at Arido
It has transformed the workflow because fewer people are needed for some tasks, and the automation of tasks means that not much human effort is required.
Cloud Operations Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
This setup significantly reduces task efficiency in high latency scenarios, providing dynamic websites, faster responses, quicker solutions, and smoother searches compared to typical browsing methods.
Senior Data Scientist at Evolvision Technologies
When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins.
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
When the analyst uses queries to search, it pulls the data quickly, in a second, which aids us greatly with the investigation.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
It utilizes 400 days of hot data, allowing queries to run very fast and yield results quicker than other tools in terms of security and SIEM capability.
Senior Cloud Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Comet
Ranking in AIOps
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
AI Observability (12th)
Devo
Ranking in AIOps
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (18th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (18th), IT Operations Analytics (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the AIOps category, the mindshare of Comet is 1.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Devo is 2.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AIOps Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Comet1.3%
Devo2.0%
Other96.7%
AIOps
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2827170 - PeerSpot reviewer
student at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
Organizing research experiments has improved and supports faster model comparison and learning
My experience with Comet has been very positive, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. One area is the learning curve for new users. Some of the more advanced features can feel overwhelming at first, especially for students who are new to machine learning experiment tracking. More beginner-friendly tutorials and guided onboarding would help. I would also like to see more customization options for dashboards and visualizations, making it easier to create views tailored to specific projects. Another improvement would be deeper integration with commonly used collaboration tools, which would streamline project documentation and team workflows. There are a few additional areas where Comet could improve. From a performance perspective, I occasionally notice that dashboards with a large number of experiments can take longer to load or navigate. Regarding documentation, while the available resources are helpful, I would appreciate more beginner-focused examples, step-by-step tutorials, and real-world use cases. For support, my experience has generally been good, but having more community resources, discussion forums, webinars, or educational content specifically aimed at students and researchers would be valuable.
Usama Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response
Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AIOps solutions are best for your needs.
909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Construction Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Comet for SageMaker Partner AI Apps?
I would not say there are downsides. Basically, I want to integrate multiple tools altogether within Comet into my services. However, MCPs was not being integrated currently inside Comet. If any MC...
What is your primary use case for Comet for SageMaker Partner AI Apps?
We potentially utilize Comet for web browsing and AI-based web browsing on Comet scenarios to handle all the kinds of activities that we usually do on web services. We have utilized this to make ea...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comet?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I am using Perplexity, the pro version, which is connected to Comet, and together they provide me with very good results at a cost of o...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?
The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...
What needs improvement with Devo?
Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM ...
What is your primary use case for Devo?
I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Comet for SageMaker Partner AI Apps
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel
Find out what your peers are saying about Comet vs. Devo and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.