CodeSonar vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

CodeSecure and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. CodeSecure is ranked #27, while Tenable is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.5. CodeSecure holds a 1.2% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

CodeSonar

Read 7 CodeSonar reviews

2,751 Views
1,898 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 18 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

2,265 Views
1,835 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

CodeSonar

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and CodeSonar compete in the application security tools category. Tenable.io seems to have the upper hand with pricing and support, while CodeSonar leads with advanced analysis capabilities.

Features: Tenable.io offers comprehensive vulnerability detection, integration capabilities, and user-friendly web application scanning. CodeSonar provides deep static analysis, extensive security flaw coverage, and pinpointing capabilities for complex code vulnerabilities.

Room for Improvement: Tenable.io needs to enhance reporting functionalities, improve scan speeds, and possibly broaden security flaw coverage. CodeSonar requires better integration with third-party tools, improvements in handling large codebases, and an easier deployment process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable.io is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. CodeSonar, although complex to deploy, is recognized for its dedicated support team capable of effectively resolving issues.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable.io is lauded for its competitive setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious users, and promises quick ROI. CodeSonar, while more expensive, justifies its cost with detailed insights and high long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,444 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar

Ranking in Application Security Tools

27th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Code Analysis (10th)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning	1.4%
CodeSonar	1.2%
Other	97.4%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY

Intigration Developer at ez-Wheel

Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand

This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.

Read full review

Hatem Langar

Security Analyst at TOPNET

Web audits have identified vulnerabilities and now provide clear visibility into compliance gaps

We have experience with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, and we use it as well; we have approximately ten licenses for web application scanning. We use it to find vulnerabilities, but Tenable.io Web Application Scanning does not include remediation; we remediate with other products. We use the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has helped us a lot with some issues and has helped us avoid bad code."

"It has been able to scale."

"CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats."

"The solution is very stable and we have used it for a long time with no issues."

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code."

"CodeSonar has helped our organization because it detects dead and nonusable parts of code to create a more optimized code."

"What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times."

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful."

More CodeSonar pros

"I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning to others."

"I think Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is the best option on the market at the moment."

"All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."

"It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management."

"Our primary use case for the solution is automated scanning; it doesn't require scripting knowledge or any of those suites or other tools, so it is fully automated, and we provide the credentials and URL and the tool does all scanning and will show the result per the requirement."

"Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions."

"The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment."

"Tenable provides the end analysis results covering all the published vulnerabilities and information on the market."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved."

"CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C."

"It was expensive."

"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security."

"There could be a shared licensing model for the users."

"In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

"The MISRA guidelines were not appropriately reported and there were some flags or errors."

More CodeSonar cons

"It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable."

"The reporting in Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not as good as the reporting in Tenable SC."

"The market is standard for vulnerability scanning, however, the posture can be improved through Tenable's prioritization engine."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not very user-friendly and you need a lot of information to get proper reports. The tool's support is not very responsive."

"The report customization needs to be better."

"They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved."

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

"The report customization needs to be better."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."

"Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."

"Pricing is a bit costly."

"The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"The pricing is okay."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

25%

Computer Software Company

University

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

If there were a solution, I would like to see automation and an integrated remediation solution for vulnerability or patch management.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I do not understand what API approach means; I do not understand this term. I think Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is the best option on the market at the moment. My review rating for this pro...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I think the price is expensive. We do not have an idea of how much we have to pay approximately, but comparing to other products, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs CodeSonar

Compared 20% of the time

Coverity Static vs CodeSonar

Compared 15% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar

Compared 7% of the time

Veracode vs CodeSonar

Compared 6% of the time

Helix QAC vs CodeSonar

Compared 4% of the time

More CodeSonar Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 6% of the time

SonarQube vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 5% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 5% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

February 2026

Download CodeSonar product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

February 2026

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Overview

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

CodeSecure

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

March 2026

Free Report: CodeSonar vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CodeSonar vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.