CloverETL vs WhereScape RED comparison

Javlin and WhereScape are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Javlin is ranked #61, while WhereScape is ranked #46. Javlin holds a 0.3% mindshare in DI, compared to WhereScape’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WhereScape users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

448 Views
242 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WhereScape RED

Read 15 WhereScape RED reviews

1,602 Views
1,266 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CloverETL

WhereScape RED

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

WhereScape RED and CloverETL are competing in the data integration tool category. WhereScape RED seems to have the upper hand in terms of cost-effectiveness and customer service satisfaction, while CloverETL offers a more comprehensive feature set.

Features: WhereScape RED focuses on automation, metadata-driven development, and efficiency in deployment and maintenance. CloverETL provides extensive data transformation capabilities, robust connectivity options, and advanced data manipulation features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WhereScape RED ensures quick deployment through its automation and metadata-centric system, with highly regarded customer service. CloverETL provides deployment flexibility and can support a wide range of systems, although it might require more initial configuration effort. Both products offer reliable customer support, but users tend to prefer WhereScape RED's service.

Pricing and ROI: WhereScape RED offers lower setup costs and faster ROI, making it ideal for budget-focused buyers. CloverETL's higher initial costs are offset by its advanced functionalities and long-term ROI potential, due to its extensive integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CloverETL vs. WhereScape RED Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. WhereScape RED

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Ranking in Data Integration

61st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Visualization (37th)

WhereScape RED

Ranking in Data Integration

46th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of CloverETL is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WhereScape RED is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

it_user856614

Lead Programmer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation

Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…

Read full review

reviewer1618884

BI Analyst DW Architect at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees

Quick to set up, flexible, and stable

The scheduling part I don't like due to the fact that it allows you to schedule as a parent and child and other things, however, the error trackability has to be a little more user-friendly. It's also not user-friendly in the sense that it loads all the jobs and there are not enough filters so that it doesn't need to load everything. If the job fails, you don't get any type of alert or email. It would be ideal if there was some sort of automated alert message. Technical support isn't the best. It would be ideal if we understood how to do it in a card exception regarding exclusion, where the card is captured separately rather than filling the whole process on the data inbound side. Certain workloads like this are organized in such a way where you seem to be doubling the work as opposed to streamlining the process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the metadata generated code."

"Quickly develops a data warehouse for our organization with documentation and can track back/forward features."

"Their support staff are very knowledgeable, courteous, and professional. I feel their support staff go above and beyond to assure their customers are satisfied."

"I found the initial setup very easy."

"This is a fantastically robust DW tool that will make you at least 10 times faster in producing a DW."

"WhereScape's deployment package is a fantastic feature. The application allows for selecting specific objects that you would like to deploy from one environment to another rather than deploying the entire database."

"Data transformations and rollups are easy to accomplish."

"Naturally produces a way to easily debug your DW data solutions."

More WhereScape RED pros

Cons

"Its documentation could be improved."

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"The ability to execute SSIS projects within WhereScape would be nice because we have a lot of packages that are too cumbersome to recreate."

"The solution can be a little more user-friendly on enterprise-level where people use it."

"Jobs cannot be deleted via the deployment package. When deploying from dev to QA or production, a job has to be retired. The job has to be manually removed from the target environment."

"Technical support isn't the best."

"No support for change data capture or delta detection - that must be custom coded ."

"It could use a tool to diagnose what is missing from the environment for WhereScape to install successfully."

"Improve the object renaming ability (it works, but it could be more automated)."

"They need a more robust support center. It has been a bit difficult to find solutions to problems that are out-of-the-box."

More WhereScape RED cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Speed to market of a warehouse solution at a relatively inexpensive price point."

"Our company purchased a corporate unlimited license."

"ROI is at least 10 times."

"Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 50% of the time

SAS Visual Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 50% of the time

More CloverETL Competitors

Azure Data Factory vs WhereScape RED

Compared 14% of the time

dbt vs WhereScape RED

Compared 14% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs WhereScape RED

Compared 13% of the time

SSIS vs WhereScape RED

Compared 12% of the time

erwin Data Catalog vs WhereScape RED

Compared 12% of the time

More WhereScape RED Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

August 2025

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

WhereScape RED

July 2025

Download WhereScape RED product report

Overview

CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

Javlin

WhereScape is data warehouse software that automates the Data Warehouse lifecycle. From implementation to maintenance, WhereScape will ensure your data warehouse projects are completed up to 5x faster than manual coding.

WhereScape

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

British American Tobacco, Cornell University, Allianz Benelux, Finnair, Solarwinds and many more.

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. WhereScape RED

August 2025

Free Report: CloverETL vs. WhereScape RED

Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. WhereScape RED and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloverETL vs. WhereScape RED report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.