CloverETL vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

Javlin and Salesforce are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Javlin is ranked #59, while Salesforce is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.8. Javlin holds a 0.7% mindshare in DI, compared to Salesforce’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

912 Views
556 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,461 Views
672 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloverETL

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

CloverETL and MuleSoft Composer compete in the data integration space, each offering unique capabilities. CloverETL holds an edge in pricing and comprehensive support, while MuleSoft Composer's extensive integration functionalities are compelling for extensive needs.

Features: CloverETL offers robust data transformation, flexible automated workflows, and custom scripting. MuleSoft Composer provides ease of integration with systems, numerous connectors, and pre-built templates for streamlined data interactions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloverETL provides a flexible deployment model adaptable to varied infrastructure environments with comprehensive support, while MuleSoft Composer focuses on cloud-based deployment, offering simplicity but needing additional configurations for complex setups.

Pricing and ROI: CloverETL offers a cost-effective entry point and delivers solid returns for complex data transformation needs. MuleSoft Composer involves higher initial investments but promises significant ROI through extensive integration capabilities and faster outcomes.

To learn more, read our detailed CloverETL vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. MuleSoft Composer

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Ranking in Data Integration

59th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Visualization (33rd)

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Data Integration

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (15th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of CloverETL is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MuleSoft Composer	0.7%
CloverETL	0.7%
Other	98.6%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

it_user856614

Lead Programmer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation

Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…

Read full review

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility

I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

Cons

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"Its documentation could be improved."

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...

See all answers

Comparisons

ViaSQL by Adaptigent vs CloverETL

Compared 20% of the time

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 19% of the time

SAS Visual Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 16% of the time

CData Drivers vs CloverETL

Compared 15% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs CloverETL

Compared 11% of the time

More CloverETL Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 13% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 11% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 8% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

January 2026

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Also Known As

No data available

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Overview

CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

Javlin

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. MuleSoft Composer

January 2026

Free Report: CloverETL vs. MuleSoft Composer

Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloverETL vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.