CloudBolt vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation comparison

CloudBolt and OpenText are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. CloudBolt is ranked #21, while OpenText is ranked #34. CloudBolt holds a 2.5% mindshare in CM, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of CloudBolt users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

CloudBolt

Read 8 CloudBolt reviews

1,236 Views
1,100 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Read 6 OpenText Cloud Service Automation reviews

404 Views
303 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudBolt

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

OpenText Cloud Service Automation and CloudBolt are competitive products offering cloud management solutions for enterprises. CloudBolt is considered a superior choice due to its extensive feature set and perceived value to users.

Features: OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides strong automation capabilities, integrates well with existing enterprise tools, and supports multiple catalogs for user-specific offerings. CloudBolt offers scalable solutions, extensive cloud provider support, and customizable service delivery with powerful integration options, making it adaptable and efficient for diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its feature expandability and user interface to match CloudBolt's customization and scripting capabilities. It also lacks the extensive cloud support offered by CloudBolt. CloudBolt might improve its user training resources and streamline cost management features, as its flexibility might intimidate new users unfamiliar with script-based customizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Cloud Service Automation facilitates a straightforward deployment process with solid integration support, aiding the initial setup. CloudBolt, however, features a more seamless deployment model and highly responsive customer service, which assists in resolving setup concerns and provides ongoing support, enhancing user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Cloud Service Automation is valued for its transparent pricing and potential quick ROI due to its feature offerings. CloudBolt's pricing is higher, yet the investment is seen as worthwhile because of its customizable and integrated capabilities, suggesting a potentially higher long-term return on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudBolt vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudBolt

Ranking in Cloud Management

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (34th)

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Ranking in Cloud Management

34th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudBolt is 2.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Cloud Service Automation is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CloudBolt	2.5%
OpenText Cloud Service Automation	0.7%
Other	96.8%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

AdeolaEkunola

Director at NIGERCUBES LTD

The solution offers reliable resource control but needs to improve its UI

Cloudbox is just an abstraction software. There is no need for scalability. It's quite a simple solution. You might only need to increase the resources you apply to the CloudBold deployment. If, for example, the number of users increases, you might have to check the recommendations from CloudBolt and act accordingly. We have over 100 internal users. Regarding the infrastructure it sits on, the solution sits on the private of the on-prem, a VMware infrastructure that stands across two sites, the DR and the main production. We have over 60 ESXi of Asterisk and about 500 or 1,000 virtual machines.

Read full review

SunpritSingh

Test Lead at MindTree

A user friendly solution that makes it easy to submit and view jobs

The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user-friendly the solution is. Traditionally, when we use a mainframe system to submit jobs, we have to see the spool or any error we might get in the spool. It is very command-based and uses a green screen, which is not user-friendly. Micro Focus enterprise makes it easy to submit and view jobs. We just have to log into the particular portal, go to the catalog and view any files we want. The same can be said about submitting jobs. We know what JCL we want to submit, give it the path, and then submit it with no command required. It is very user-friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the self-service features valuable."

"The solution's biggest advantage is flexibility"

"Role-based access control and application blueprinting."

"The initial deployment was super easy."

"Hybrid cloud platform for VM and app deployment and management, with very good stability. It's customizable, easy to set up, and can be deployed within half an hour."

"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."

Cons

"The solution is not easy to use. It's not intuitive enough to click anywhere in the solution and make it work."

"The area of integrating on-prem and cloud needs improvement."

"Could increase the number of integrations and add more out-of-the-box work flows."

"The scheduling feature of CloudBolt needs improvement because sometimes, it doesn't work."

"The management of SaaS must be improved."

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."

"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The system is cheaper if a customer has fewer servers since you pay by the node."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because the solution is expensive."

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?

The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?

OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?

We have large customers for OpenText Cloud Service Automation. I rate it a nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Morpheus vs CloudBolt

Compared 54% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudBolt

Compared 12% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs CloudBolt

Compared 11% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs CloudBolt

Compared 6% of the time

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs CloudBolt

Compared 6% of the time

More CloudBolt Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 53% of the time

Morpheus vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 47% of the time

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt

October 2025

Download CloudBolt product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation

September 2025

OpenText Cloud Service Automation report

Download OpenText Cloud Service Automation product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation

Overview

CloudBolt supports a variety of cloud technologies, from on-premises virtualization and private cloud to a wide range public and hybrid cloud configurations.

No need to rip-and-replace. CloudBolt provides easy import, syncing, and management of legacy deployments even as it helps you build out new cloud environments.

CloudBolt lets administrators create and maintain configuration standards while developing a reusable library of service and application templates.

CloudBolt

OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

WM, CyWest, Panic, Camden, University of Maryland, Xerox, Neustar, Medidata, Continu, Aruba Networks, Neuberger Berman, Peak6, EverBank, Ascensus, Hosting Edge

China Merchants Bank, Osiatis

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation

September 2025

Free Report: CloudBolt vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBolt vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudBolt vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.