CloudBees vs GoCD comparison

CloudBees and Thoughtworks are both solutions in the Build Automation category. CloudBees is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Thoughtworks is ranked #17 with an average rating of 6.5. CloudBees holds a 1.9% mindshare in BA, compared to Thoughtworks’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudBees users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Thoughtworks users who would recommend it.

CloudBees

Read 20 CloudBees reviews

1,386 Views
721 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GoCD

Read 7 GoCD reviews

1,175 Views
670 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

CloudBees

GoCD

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

GoCD and CloudBees are both tools in the CI/CD domain, with CloudBees generally considered superior due to its comprehensive enterprise features despite GoCD's competitive pricing.

Features: GoCD offers valuable features such as detailed pipeline visualization, flexible configurations for complex workflows, and integration with multiple teams. CloudBees provides advanced security features, a vast plugin ecosystem, and a scalable architecture suitable for large enterprises.

Room for Improvement: GoCD could enhance its plugin offerings and improve community support for troubleshooting. The user interface could benefit from further refinement. Meanwhile, CloudBees could address version compatibility issues with plugins and Jenkins instances, and work on reducing the dependency on manual configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GoCD is noted for its straightforward deployment process appealing to teams looking for simplicity. CloudBees offers managed hosting with extensive enterprise support, providing organizations with a more hands-off approach and reliable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: GoCD is an open-source tool that minimizes initial costs, offering good ROI for budget-conscious teams. CloudBees requires higher upfront costs but its advanced features can lead to greater long-term benefits, enhancing productivity and reliability in enterprise environments.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudBees vs. GoCD Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. GoCD

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,768 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees

Ranking in Build Automation

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (2nd), DevSecOps (5th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd), Feature Management (1st), AI Software Development (4th)

GoCD

Ranking in Build Automation

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (18th), Release Automation (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 1.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GoCD is 2.1%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CloudBees	1.9%
GoCD	2.1%
Other	96.0%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani

Senior Associate at BNP Paribas CIB

Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes

Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.

Read full review

RajeshReddy

Dev Ops Engineer at Infosys

The UI is colorful, but the user experience must be improved

We can see all the pipelines with a simple search. The UI is colorful. The user experience is very rich. The product is very easy to learn if we know a bit of the basics. If we have someone to show us how to use it, it is very easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It’s a very good tool for auditing your project pipelines as well."

"I find the automation feature most valuable. CloudBees is highly scalable and supports both small and large teams. The deployment process is also faster when compared to on-premise."

"The most valuable features are Java features, microservice communication, payment validation, Jenkins Sonar, management master to CloudBees, Blue Ocean, JobConfig, and support."

"CloudBees operates seamlessly. Deploying to a cluster is straightforward—just one click, and the job is done."

"The initial setup is easy."

"Scalability largely depends on how the tool is set up within your infrastructure"

"CloudBees is the Jenkins tool for building and deploying. There's open-source Jenkins, which is free and can be used by any organization, but it offers a different architecture for Jenkins. If your organization is larger, you might choose the architecture. This way, you can have different masters for different applications, and different teams can manage their masters separately. However, a single person can still control all the masters, whoever manages it for the organization."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that its GUI is quite simple."

More CloudBees pros

"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."

"GoCD's open-source nature is valuable."

"The UI is colorful."

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."

Cons

"To improve efficiency, they should focus on smoother label deployment."

"The platform could integrate better with other tools and support external tools directly."

"To use the tool, you need to be familiar with the tool itself and with how it will be incorporated into the culture."

"The problem with CloudBees is that when you merge it, the pipelines would randomly fail multiple times."

"I would like to see improved speed and availability."

"The setup is somewhat complicated. You need a cloud architect and engineer to set it up properly. The initial setup will take time, so you need a good engineer and architect to handle it."

"One challenge I'd like to highlight is that with CloudBees CI growing bigger and bigger, there are limitations in terms of managing old plugins and services and upgrading them with time."

"There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. W"

More CloudBees cons

"It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified."

"The tool must be more user-friendly."

"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's an open-source and free tool."

"This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Legal Firm

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?

There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudBees?

We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?

I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.

See all answers

What do you like most about GoCD?

The UI is colorful.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GoCD?

One area of product improvement is the access control system. It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be sim...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GoCD?

The solution helps us deploy microservices across multiple environments.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs CloudBees

Compared 18% of the time

Harness vs CloudBees

Compared 18% of the time

CircleCI vs CloudBees

Compared 17% of the time

Digital.ai Release vs CloudBees

Compared 17% of the time

Tekton vs CloudBees

Compared 17% of the time

More CloudBees Competitors

GitLab vs GoCD

Compared 15% of the time

Bamboo vs GoCD

Compared 10% of the time

Jenkins vs GoCD

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub Actions vs GoCD

Compared 9% of the time

Tekton vs GoCD

Compared 9% of the time

More GoCD Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees

January 2026

Download CloudBees product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

December 2025

Download GoCD product report

Also Known As

No data available

Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go

Overview

CloudBees provides a highly scalable and secure platform that supports seamless integration and automation across multiple environments. It excels in managing Jenkins instances and offers flexible deployment options, enhancing efficiency for large teams.

CloudBees is recognized for its integration with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible, allowing companies to leverage its robust automation capabilities for continuous integration and deployment. With its strong support for Docker and Kubernetes, teams benefit from streamlined code management and operational efficiency. Its scalable architecture, real-time feedback, and premium vendor support help manage large-scale applications and microservices. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with pipeline setup, service availability, and GUI accessibility, which suggest room for improvement in these areas.

What are the key features of CloudBees?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and improves workflow efficiency.
Robust scalability: Supports growth and large-scale application management.
Advanced security: Ensures data security and compliance.
Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible.
Flexible deployment: Adapts to different infrastructure needs across environments.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Enhanced efficiency: Automation reduces manual workload.
Real-time feedback: Provides immediate insights into pipeline performance.
Vendor support: Offers assistance for troubleshooting and growth.
Scalable architecture: Accommodates business expansion requirements.

In tech and software industries, companies implement CloudBees for managing complex CI/CD pipelines. Its integration with DevOps tools facilitates automation and workflow optimization. Industries with large teams managing thousands of microservices use CloudBees to maintain high availability, streamline processes, and ensure security compliance, driving efficient production workflows.

CloudBees

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.

Thoughtworks

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee

Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. GoCD

December 2025

Free Report: CloudBees vs. GoCD

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. GoCD and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudBees vs. GoCD report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.