Cisco UCS Director vs Nutanix Central comparison

Cisco and Nutanix are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cisco is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.7, while Nutanix is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.8. Additionally, 73% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Director

Read 15 Cisco UCS Director reviews

602 Views
572 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

Nutanix Central

Read 6 Nutanix Central reviews

441 Views
225 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

Nutanix Central

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 10, 2025

Cisco UCS Director and Nutanix Central are competitive solutions in the field of IT infrastructure management. Cisco UCS Director seems to hold an advantage in scalability and integration with third-party systems, while Nutanix Central is favored for its simplicity and effectiveness in hyper-converged infrastructures.

Features: Cisco UCS Director offers robust automation, orchestration, and multi-cloud management capabilities. Its ability to manage multiple workloads across AWS, Azure, or on-premises infrastructures adds significant value. Nutanix Central focuses on hyper-converged infrastructure, providing easy scalability and a unified management interface that simplifies operations.

Room for Improvement: Cisco UCS Director could enhance user-friendliness and reduce complexity in deployment processes. Simplifying its interface and improving intuitive navigation would be beneficial. Nutanix Central might benefit from expanded integration capabilities with third-party systems and enhanced support for diverse automation options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS Director involves a more complex deployment, but its extensive support options ensure successful setups. In contrast, Nutanix Central's intuitive management console facilitates a streamlined deployment process, reducing setup complexities significantly.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS Director generally requires a higher initial investment due to its comprehensive feature set but promises solid ROI through its extensive integration capabilities. On the other hand, Nutanix Central offers a more manageable setup cost with strong ROI potential from efficient management and reduced operational complexities.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Director vs. Nutanix Central Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. Nutanix Central

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director

Ranking in Cloud Management

20th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nutanix Central

Ranking in Cloud Management

17th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Virtualization Management Tools (6th), Data Center Infrastructure Management (7th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (8th)

Featured Reviews

Sunny Nair

Solution Architect and Senior Consultant at Keysight Technologies

Good multi-cloud management capability, but third-party and legacy integration needs improvement

Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems. I feel that more development or a more integrated road map should be set up so that it becomes a common platform for any infrastructure. In the next release of this solution, I would like to see changes in the navigation controls of UCS Director. That would be helpful. Modifying the icons that are available for use, as well as virtualization aspects.

Read full review

reviewer2703777

S30290139 Infrastructure Administrator II at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees

Helps us get ahead of potential problems, and their support has been phenomenal

I don't think there's much improvement needed in Nutanix Central. Maybe there are different tools I haven't discovered yet that may bring everyone on the same page. I am still in the process of researching them and providing feedback to Nutanix. For what we use it for, it runs efficiently. What I think is missing in Nutanix Central to make it the best product ever is compatibility with our backups. One of the biggest challenges we have with Nutanix currently is that our Rubrik backups do not work with the Nutanix API. That would be great to resolve, as it would reduce the time spent resolving the issue.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is helpful for centralized management."

"An easy and strong configuration, along with its low cost, are some of the features of the solution."

"UCS director enables us to be more productive and more agile, and also more self-sufficient because we don't have to depend on anybody else."

"This is a user-friendly solution that is very good and easy to use."

"Cisco's knowledge base is extensive."

"The main feature of this solution is the integration with all the Cisco solutions and other vendors."

"Feature-wise, the solution helps one to add multiple environments in one place...It is a scalable product."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

"Nutanix Central scales very effectively with our growing needs."

"My experience has been phenomenal."

"The grouping feature in Nutanix Central is helpful because, from my perspective, it's similar to tagging that I've been using in AWS and Rubrik."

"The features of Nutanix Central that I value most are primarily the hardware portion because it tells us everything available regarding BIOS upgrades and any updates that become compatible, including LCM upgrades. I enjoy troubleshooting and dealing with urgent issues."

"One of the best features is that it provides a unified control plane, which offers single-pane-of-glass visibility for us."

"The ease of use is valuable because we can manage two different clusters or several clusters with it. I appreciate the one umbrella management feel. We can run updates and get different types of analytics."

"It provided a significant increase in speed and ease of use."

"I would give the customer service a perfect score."

More Nutanix Central pros

Cons

"The areas where this product can be improved are the integrations and the UI. These features are not as friendly compared to VMware products."

"The tool should be a lot more intuitive and make it easy for us to understand and migrate."

"I would like to see more integration with other solutions."

"The product's pricing needs to improve."

"We cannot depend on this solution to manage all of the data center's infrastructure."

"Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand."

"The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API."

"There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

"The update process in terms of using LCM or using Central is sometimes confusing, but I think they are working towards unifying that."

"One of the things I'd want to see in Nutanix Central is more utility. It would be nice to go in and say, "This VM doesn't need to be in this data center, and we'd prefer to put it in this one," and have the ability to initiate the migration, even if we have to make changes to networks."

"The update process in terms of using LCM or using Central is sometimes confusing, but I think they are working towards unifying that."

"The permissions should be set for the highest level, more akin to cluster admin and Prism admin. There have been occasions where I needed to log into Prism Central directly to complete work due to permissions issues from Nutanix Central. They are very close to a one-for-one equivalence. While their website states it is not meant to replace Prism Element or Prism Central, I would prefer to see it reach the level where I can perform all Prism Central tasks from one location to multiple Prism Centrals."

"What I think is missing in Nutanix Central to make it the best product ever is compatibility with our backups. One of the biggest challenges we have with Nutanix currently is that our Rubrik backups do not work with the Nutanix API. That would be great to resolve, as it would reduce the time spent resolving the issue."

"One area of improvement could be from the AI side, as the industry shifts and grows."

"The API needs work. It's not specifically Central, but just the API as a whole. We've had a recurring issue where the API calls stack up and hang during backups from Rubrik, which has been a challenge, but Nutanix has their API version four coming out pretty soon, or it is available now, and we just can't upgrade yet. We're hoping to see some major improvements there."

"There is a sense that they want to close tickets faster than always getting the resolution right."

More Nutanix Central cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"Our experience was fine. We have no complaints."

"We tie in with cost governance in Nutanix Central, which helps us identify other products and determine whether we need to increase our licensing or reduce it."

"We had the benefit of already being under Ultimate and Pro for the majority of our licensing models. We do not incur additional costs for using Nutanix Central. Similar to Security Central, this is one of those tools we are adopting, integrating, and promoting because we already have access to it."

"My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing is limited as I don't manage that part. However, I know it has been within budget and hasn't impacted our financial planning."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Director?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

It should be more of a cloud-based architecture for Cisco UCS Director, and it should be affordable to small customers as well because the pricing is a major challenge when we talk about Cisco UCS ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Central?

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing is limited as I don't manage that part. However, I know it has been within budget and hasn't impacted our financial planning.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Central?

One area of improvement could be from the AI side, as the industry shifts and grows. If we could get workflow mechanisms built into Nutanix Central, we could define workflows to solve known issues ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Central?

We use Nutanix Central for our hybrid cloud management because we have our on-premises Nutanix clusters and AWS cloud resources.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 35% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 28% of the time

Morpheus vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 12% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 11% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

Morpheus vs Nutanix Central

Compared 100% of the time

More Nutanix Central Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

October 2025

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Central

September 2025

Download Nutanix Central product report

Overview

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

Nutanix Central offers a comprehensive platform for IT management, providing seamless integration and enhanced control across multi-cloud environments. It supports enterprises in scaling their digital operations efficiently and securely.

Designed for enterprise-grade deployment, Nutanix Central simplifies management tasks across different workloads with its intuitive interface. By integrating hybrid and multi-cloud operations, it allows management from a central point, making administration straightforward. This single platform is optimized for performance, helping companies reduce complexity while maintaining top-notch security protocols. With scalability at its core, Nutanix Central adapts to the changing demands of businesses, offering a reliable infrastructure for various applications.

What are the most important features?

Unified Management: Centralizes control of IT environments from a single dashboard.
Multi-cloud Integration: Supports seamless operation across public and private clouds.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs without compromising performance.
Security: Ensures data protection with robust security measures.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational expenses by optimizing resource use.
Enhanced Productivity: Streamlines IT management activities.
Business Agility: Enables swift response to market changes.
Reduced Complexity: Simplifies infrastructure management processes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail leverage Nutanix Central for its capability to manage distributed IT environments efficiently. In healthcare, it supports compliance and patient data security, while retail benefits from its ability to enhance customer experiences through agile IT operations. The financial sector relies on its robust security features to safeguard sensitive information, ensuring business continuity and regulatory adherence.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. Nutanix Central

September 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS Director vs. Nutanix Central

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Director vs. Nutanix Central and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Director vs. Nutanix Central report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.