Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Pandora FMS comparison

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

5,558 Views
2,946 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Pandora FMS and Cisco Secure Network Analytics are competitors in the network monitoring and security analytics industry. Cisco Secure Network Analytics appears to have an edge in security environments due to its advanced threat detection and analytics.

Features: Pandora FMS offers a comprehensive alarm system, license simplicity, and versatile monitoring across platforms, supporting both agent-based and agentless monitoring. It integrates efficiently with numerous systems. Cisco Secure Network Analytics provides deep network visibility, advanced analytics, robust threat detection, real-time monitoring, and Layer 7 visibility.

Room for Improvement: Pandora FMS could better integrate with cloud services, enhance graphical analytics, and simplify user experience to reduce training requirements. Cisco Secure Network Analytics could improve its AI features, simplify its interface, and enhance integration with other Cisco tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pandora FMS supports hybrid and on-premises deployments, and its responsive support is highly commended by users. Cisco Secure Network Analytics focuses on on-premises setups but would benefit from easier installation processes. Despite stable support, improvements in speed and user interaction are needed. Pandora’s customer service is praised for its helpfulness, surpassing Cisco in feedback.

Pricing and ROI: Pandora FMS is favored for its competitive pricing model, simplicity, and open-source flexibility, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with clear potential for ROI. Cisco Secure Network Analytics, while critiqued for high licensing costs, is seen as valuable by some users due to its advanced features. Pandora’s pricing is more transparent, while Cisco suits organizations investing in comprehensive security.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: August 2026).

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Pandora FMS

Download the complete report

Helped 910,005 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

33rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (5th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (6th), Cisco Security Portfolio (8th)

Pandora FMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

66th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (27th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (58th), Log Management (61st), Cloud Monitoring Software (39th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Secure Network Analytics	0.9%
Pandora FMS	0.7%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Harun-Owr-Roshid

CEO at BRIGHT-i SYSTEMS LIMITED

Have streamlined network visibility and troubleshooting while seeing benefits from AI integration

In terms of improvements for Cisco Secure Network Analytics, from the implementation point of view, now that AI is in use, some other features need to be upgraded considering AI solutions. Proper management of the database is also important; it should be centralized for easier data collection from a single database. When precise manual analysis is needed, it's sometimes difficult, so having a centralized database will allow network admins to find actual scenarios more effectively, especially since some information may not be visible on the GUI. Cisco should upgrade their hardware part to run the database, because sometimes it cannot handle the load while all features are running in the network. The database management should indeed be centralized because while AI runs behind the systems, central management is essential. For example, in a network with 100 Cisco switches, a few routers, firewalls, and access points, all data generated should be preserved in a central database. This approach simplifies management and analysis for troubleshooting, as GUI interfaces may not always provide visible information. Centralizing the database will allow for better understanding of which information is preserved for each specific device.

Read full review

MichaelMaack

Independent Consultant at Maack Consulting

The open architecture is easy to extend and enhance

Pandora could deliver better analytics out of the box. You can work around these limitations with the help of other tools like Grafana. The shortcomings are mostly on the graphical side. The built-in report generators are a bit limited in some areas. They could improve their management console's ability to monitor large environments could be improved. For example, SNMP management is only partially integrated into the management console.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is anomaly detection, where it finds things that are not allowed internally."

"This product alleviates the day-to-day headaches for us, in regards to metrics."

"Overall, It seemed like a good product."

"The search options on Cisco Stealthwatch are the most valuable. You can get very granular with it, down to the kilobits or the seconds if you want. The product supports any time frame that you need, so that is nice."

"It has improved my organization's network visibility from zero because before we had installed this solution, we weren't doing anything to protect us from threats."

"The most valuable feature is NetFlow. The beginning of any security investigation starts with NetFlow data."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is data hoarding because it catches threats on a frequent basis that we had no idea of."

"We use it to monitor for any anomaly behavior and analyze results."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pros

"It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. There is a long list of different ones from Nagios. You can just use them, and within seconds, you get yourself a check that is monitoring whatever you need. It is really flexible. I guess that's why they call it Pandora Flexible Monitoring System (FMS). It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. Our network guy just recently asked about a particular protocol to monitor the bandwidth on the network, which is not a common protocol. When I looked it up, and I found that they cover it. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

"The support is excellent for this product; their response time is very fast, and they are very knowledgeable."

"This solution has screens that are easy to understand and provide a wealth of information."

"This tool has been of great help because we can manage faster solutions with the problems in our network and it helped us reduce our response time."

"It allows me to quickly see the status of all of my printers, switches, computers, and virtual machines to determine if any system has fallen."

"Pandora FMS (the Flexible Monitoring System) is an all-in-one package solution, and we can monitor our whole system with Service perspective."

"The monitoring system within this solution is very good. It is easy to use and navigate, and makes issue alarms easily viewable."

"Features I have found most valuable with Pandora are the personalized metrics and the simplicity of data."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"They should include Citrix VDIs in the next release."

"Initially, I felt Cisco Secure Network Analytics lacked integration with Splunk."

"Many of these tools require extensive on-premises hardware to run."

"This is an expensive product. We have quit paying for support because we don't want to have to upgrade it and keep paying for it."

"The solution should have the ability to analyze security events not only at the network layer but also at the application and OS layers."

"The expensive nature of the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"We determined that Stealthwatch wouldn't provide the machine learning model that we required."

"One of the things which bugs me about Lancope is the licensing."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics cons

"It would be useful if Pandora FMS included an ISO image (or «software appliance») for each big company that leases virtual private machines (VPS), just like in AWS."

"This solution requires proper training to get 100% out of it."

"We would like the real-time monitoring of an interface to be improved within this solution."

"I think some improvements to the Android app would be good."

"I sincerely believe that Pandora needs new ideas for functionality closer to advanced device security monitoring."

"They can also do more refinement in end-user usability because not everyone is strong technically, and people who aren't strong technically might be averse to the product, even though it has come a long way."

"We would like to see improvement in the mainframe integration that this solution is capable of."

"An update to the Android app would be appreciated."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"We pay for support costs on a yearly basis."

"Today, we are part of the big Cisco ELA, and it is a la carte. We can get orders for whatever we want. At the end of the day, we have to pay for it in one big expense, but that is fine. We are okay with that."

"Our fees are approximately $3,000 USD."

"The solution is expensive. It costs several hundred thousand dollars per year (depending on how many flows you are collecting)."

"Licensing is done by flows per second, not including outside>in traffic."

"It has a subscription model. There is yearly support, and there is also three-year support. It depends on what the customers want."

"It is worth the cost."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pricing and cost advice

"Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."

"You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

18%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Stealthwatch?

Regarding cost, for the Bangladesh context, Cisco Secure Network Analytics is a little bit high-priced because we are a developing country, making it tough to manage affordable solutions. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Stealthwatch?

Several features often look very promising during evaluation or implementation but end up being used only lightly in day-to-day operations. Advanced reporting and scheduled compliance reports look ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Stealthwatch?

My main use case for Cisco Secure Network Analytics has been network visibility and anomaly-based threat detection within the enterprise environment. In security operations and VAPT-related activit...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

Vectra AI vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 4% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

Nmap vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Competitors

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 8% of the time

Nmap vs Pandora FMS

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Pandora FMS

Compared 5% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 4% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 4% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics product report

Download Pandora FMS product report

Also Known As

Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch

No data available

Overview

Cisco Secure Network Analytics enhances network security through integrated threat detection and detailed traffic visibility, optimizing performance with AI analytics and strong platform integrations.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers deep visibility into network traffic, with tools like network maps and server response times. Its AI-driven analytics help detect threats, focusing on east-west traffic. Integration with platforms such as pxGrid and ISE complements its capabilities. Reporting and telemetry help in identifying bandwidth issues, yet improvements are desired in AI for better data organization. Installation complexity and false positives present challenges, and managing network loads effectively is a recognized need.

What are the key features of Cisco Secure Network Analytics?

Deep Visibility: Provides comprehensive insights into network traffic and server behavior.
Network Maps: Enhances understanding of traffic flow and infrastructure layout.
AI Analytics: Uses AI for superior threat detection and anomaly recognition.
Integration: Compatible with platforms like pxGrid and ISE for enhanced security management.
Telemetry: Delivers detailed bandwidth usage and traffic analysis reports.

How does Cisco Secure Network Analytics provide value?

Enhanced Security: Elevates threat detection and response capabilities.
Traffic Insights: Identifies encrypted and anomalous network behaviors.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting industry standards for data protection.
Endpoint Protection: Guards network endpoints against potential threats.

Industries such as banking, defense, and police rely on Cisco Secure Network Analytics for securing networks against threats. Its capability to provide insights into encrypted traffic and facilitate device auditing makes it a sought-after choice for those requiring extensive network visibility. Users appreciate its application for threat prevention and response in demanding sectors.

Cisco

Pandora FMS offers comprehensive monitoring for IT infrastructure and services, supporting hybrid environments and enhancing operational efficiency with customizable architecture and seamless tool integration.

Pandora FMS provides a user-friendly platform for monitoring servers, network devices, and applications across virtual and cloud environments. Its agent options, centralized management, and high availability configurations allow it to support extensive network infrastructures. Offering robust alarm systems and lightweight operation, it adapts to enterprise needs, whether large or small. Users benefit from flexible metrics and plugins, although improvements in automation, analytics, and expanded API integration are anticipated. Challenges include interface instability in older versions and the need for improved dashboard customization, real-time monitoring, and cloud integration.

What features does Pandora FMS offer?

All-in-One Monitoring: Supports a wide range of platforms and devices for comprehensive visibility.
Customizable Architecture: Integrates seamlessly with external tools for tailored solutions.
High Availability Configurations: Ensures continuous monitoring and operation.
Flexible Metrics and Plugins: Enables tailored monitoring setups for diverse needs.

What are the benefits and ROI?

Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring processes and improves time management.
Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructures without sacrificing performance.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing IT tools and environments.
Comprehensive Coverage: Provides extensive oversight across a variety of platforms and environments.

In specific industries, Pandora FMS is utilized for IT service supervision, infrastructure monitoring, and network device management. Organizations leverage it to maintain network quality, ensure compliance, predict issues, and manage inventory and security. It supports both remote desktops and clients' systems, making it valuable for generating SLA reports and monitoring hybrid server environments. Pandora FMS's adaptability allows it to serve diverse sectors by facilitating efficient supervision and control.

Sample Customers

Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREF

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Pandora FMS