Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 comparison

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (34th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is 3.4%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 2.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)	3.4%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360	2.2%
Other	94.4%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer373227

System Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Marketing strengths shine but regaining user trust needs significant effort

There are numerous things that could be improved about Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) to get it back on track. Sollution for small branches: when we have to connect a lot very small branches (or sometimes only an ATM) we need something small, with LTE and with reasonable price. Cisco response is SDWAN but it is not always the case. Recently Cisco released some small firewalls but I have not tried them yet. Central management with FMC is a very good idea, but sometimes local management or monitoring is helpfull. With Cisco You have to decide: central or local. You cannot have both. Regarding usability, when you commit configuration on Cisco, it sometimes takes very long. Commits also take some time for the competition, but Cisco is definitely lagging behind the rest in this respect. Last but not least, for me as a professional is lack of CLI. With CLI, I can configure every firewall on the market except Cisco. CLI is very important in professional working, and IMHO it was an unwise decision by Cisco to remove it. Graphical interfaces are very nice, but when you've got thousands of objects in a big installation and have to configure many things, CLI is a much faster way to do it.

Read full review

reviewer2857197

Lead IT Service Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Cloud-native threat detection has improved incident investigations and now reduces breach risk

We have covered most of the features over the past three years and look forward to discovering more as we work closely with the ExtraHop technical team, who are open to sharing what they have developed. Pricing is on the higher side, typically based on load, volume of traffic, and deployment scale. The advanced detection capabilities provide significant value in reducing investigation time, making the licensing and pricing acceptable for larger organizations. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 has undeniably improved our security posture, reduced manual investigation efforts, and facilitated fast threat detection mechanisms, which all help prevent costly potential breaches in enterprise environments. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360's SaaS environment is well-suited for cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments, effectively addressing real-life scenarios involving east-west and north-south traffic. The platform is recommended for large organizations in need of comprehensive detection capabilities. I would rate this product overall as an 8 out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features that I find most valuable are the DDoS protection, IPS/IDS, and Firepower for web application filtering."

"The security intelligence in the product is the best feature and give us all the information that we need in our network."

"The initial setup wasn't complex or complicated."

"The main advantages to Cisco are the scale, the integration, the training, and the possibility of finding somebody to work with."

"We have found the IPS detection to be a very valuable feature of this solution, and it is easy to use to stop policy violations."

"The solution is good at scaling."

"Cisco Firepower is a good investment because one product can cover such a large part of the NIST security framework."

"The technical support is impressive."

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) pros

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 has undeniably improved our security posture, reduced manual investigation efforts, and facilitated fast threat detection mechanisms, which all help prevent costly potential breaches in enterprise environments."

"ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 has positively impacted my organization by helping us detect abnormal activity on our network that we could not detect through our SIEM or XDR platform."

"Their technical support is more effective and of better quality than other competitors."

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

"It is scalable."

Cons

"I would like to see integration with monitoring tools such as Nagios or BMC."

"There is room for improvement in the policy documentation."

"The configuration of this product can be simplified."

"Customer service is lacking, and I would rate it as three out of ten."

"I don't recommend Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) unless the network infrastructure is predominantly Cisco."

"The look and feel of the console could be updated."

"The time it takes for the product to mature, the maturity journey, the product maturity cycle, takes too long."

"Should include additional security features."

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) cons

"I would like to see ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 improved by integrating XDR features with NDR."

"Their professional service can be improved."

"One challenge with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is its pricing, which tends to be comparatively high in the marketplace."

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

"There needs to be more support."

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It could be less expensive."

"The annual licensing tends to be expensive, but in terms of implementing the licenses, it's a very uncomplicated process and as easy as copy-paste in its straightforwardness."

"This is an expensive product, with the biggest cost being the license that keeps the service going."

"The licensing can be billed annually or in multi-year contracts such as three, four, or five years."

"When it comes to pricing you pay for a permanent licensing structure. One, three, and five-year options. There are no extra costs."

"There are licensing fees depending on the features that you are using."

"Pricing depends on negotiation with the vendor, although I can say that it is moderate."

"Cisco products are always expensive, but if you can afford the price then it's a great solution."

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) pricing and cost advice

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Educational Organization

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	17
Large Enterprise	27

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco NGIPS?

I would rate the price for Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) as high.

What needs improvement with Cisco NGIPS?

I am aware that we are not measuring some metrics or tracking access through Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS). In my opinion, Cisco could improve the Web GUI for Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS).

What is your primary use case for Cisco NGIPS?

Our main use case for Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is in-line traffic control, and we are using IPS in an in-line mode.

What needs improvement with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

One challenge with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is its pricing, which tends to be comparatively high in the marketplace. Initial setup requires significant effort to get the platform tuned up to speed, w...

What advice do you have for others considering ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

What is your primary use case for ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud?

I use ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 as our cloud-native NDR platform, with primary use cases including monitoring real-time network traffic across the north-south environment. While we do not currently fo...

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Comparisons

Compared 11% of the time

TrendAI Tipping Point vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 9% of the time

Check Point IPS vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 8% of the time

Trellix Host Intrusion Prevention System vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 8% of the time

Venusense Intrusion Prevention System vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) Competitors

Vectra AI vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 12% of the time

NetWitness NDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 6% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 6% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Cloud Security vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 6% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Download Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) product report

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Also Known As

Sourcefire NGIPS, Firepower NGIPS

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

Overview

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) provides intrusion prevention, malware detection, and DDoS protection with modularity, third-party integration, and cloud capabilities, focusing on flexibility, automation, and real-time threat detection, while offering centralized management and ease of upgrading.

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is designed to support network security through an open platform, delivering features such as anomaly detection and security intelligence. Users benefit from robust technical support, making it a reliable choice for enterprises seeking to protect their network infrastructures. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness, interface complexity, and integration with third-party tools. There is a demand for better reporting, sandboxing capabilities, and enhanced AI-driven threat detection and response times, especially for zero-day attacks. Pricing remains a concern due to high costs and licensing complexity.

What are the key features of Cisco Secure IPS?

Intrusion Prevention: Detect and block malicious activities across networks to maintain security.
Malware Detection: Identify and mitigate malicious software in real time.
DDoS Protection: Safeguard against distributed denial-of-service attacks that can disrupt operations.
Integration: Seamlessly connect with third-party tools for enhanced functionality.
Cloud Capabilities: Use cloud-based resources for scalable and flexible security solutions.
Real-Time Threat Detection: Identify potential threats instantly to prevent exploitation.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Centralized management and hardware-free upgrading help reduce expenses.
Flexibility: Modular design and open platform ensure adaptability to changing needs.
Support: Access to expert technical assistance ensures smooth operations.
Scalability: Cloud deployment options offer enhanced scalability for growing demands.

Businesses deploy Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) in both on-premises and cloud environments, addressing needs like compliance audits and integration with platforms such as Cisco Talos and Umbrella. Its implementation strengthens perimeter security, enhances cybersecurity in enterprise and banking sectors, and ensures effective threat management for network defense.

Cisco

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offers advanced network detection and response capabilities, designed to provide real-time situational awareness and threat detection across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

Built to meet the demands of modern enterprises, ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 enhances visibility into network activities, delivering comprehensive security insights. It uses high-speed data analysis to identify anomalous behaviors and potential threats, helping security teams respond effectively. With centralized visibility, it ensures quick detection and thorough investigation of threats within complex infrastructures, including cloud, edge, and on-premises environments.

What key features does ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offer?

Real-Time Threat Detection: Monitors network traffic in real-time for immediate threat identification.
Centralized Visibility: Offers a unified dashboard for observing activities across diverse environments.
Automated Response: Enables predefined actions to mitigate threats swiftly without manual intervention.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with tools for enhanced incident management.
Advanced Analytics: Utilizes machine learning to detect sophisticated threats promptly.

What benefits should users look for in reviews of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

Improved Security Posture: Evidence of enhanced organizational security through faster threat detection and response.
Operational Efficiency: Reduction in time and effort for IT teams due to automated processes.
Scalability: Flexibility to expand with organizational growth and technology changes.
Cost-Effectiveness: Attractive pricing compared to functionality and outcomes offered.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is implemented across industries such as financial services, healthcare, and retail, where robust security measures are paramount. In these sectors, the capabilities of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 align with the need for secure handling of sensitive data and compliance with industry regulations, providing valuable protection and detection capabilities.

ExtraHop Networks

Sample Customers

American Electric Power, Huntington Bank, Keycorp, Nationwide, Transunion, Marriott, Inova Health, Ford, Thomson Reuters, Dow Chemical, Equifax, Chevron, Walmart, Coca Cola

Wizards of the Coast

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360