"The most valuable feature is the connectivity monitoring."
"Automation of the ILS."
"Enables maps to be drawn out."
"This product has good network monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities."
"NetBrain is a very simple tool."
"API lacks robustness."
"Sometimes the product gives us problems that require support."
"The solution could integrate more automation."
"Each device needs to be configured to allow NetBrain to poll for the information it needs, which can be very time-consuming for a large network."
"The IP interface brief isn't consistent."
Earn 20 points
Managing today’s networks with yesterday’s manual processes is no longer a viable solution. NetBrain’s network automation platform provides actionable insights into your network to help you make better and faster decisions - particularly when you’re troubleshooting, securing, and making changes to the network.
Cisco Data Center Network Manager is ranked 42nd in Network Monitoring Software with 2 reviews while NetBrain is ranked 7th in Network Troubleshooting with 3 reviews. Cisco Data Center Network Manager is rated 8.0, while NetBrain is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Data Center Network Manager writes "Good connectivity monitoring, but there are still things that they need to work on". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetBrain writes "Some inconsistencies which have improved recently; ability to draw out maps is a big time saver ". Cisco Data Center Network Manager is most compared with Zabbix, SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, PRTG Network Monitor, Centreon and Arista Data ANalyZer, whereas NetBrain is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Cisco DNA Center, ThousandEyes and Infoblox NetMRI. See our Cisco Data Center Network Manager vs. NetBrain report.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.