No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cisco Application Control Engine [EOL] vs HAProxy comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Application Control E...
Average Rating
4.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HAProxy
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (2nd), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (13th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (6th), Bot Management (5th), Service Mesh (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user3834 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Uncertain future. No clear direction yet.
The greatest problem with Cisco’s ADC offering is that they have ceased development of ACE hardware systems. This will surely impact future and existing customers as it puts them in limbo regarding the future of their ADC investment. Furthermore, more and more customers are giving negative feedback regarding Cisco’s perceived inadequate knowledge in this area. I've also heard that independent researchers have also received numerous complaints about Cisco’s ACE offering. Overall, Cisco’s ACE is a decent product that works for basic load-balancing requirements. It seems to me unclear how Cisco will decide to move forward with their ADC offerings. The perceived weakness of Cisco in this product space has also contributed to the somewhat poor reputation of their ADC offerings.
Shrinivas Devarkonda - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of DevOps at TripFactory
Handles high traffic efficiently and simplifies complex routing with rule-based logic
I think HAProxy is good as it stands now, but I believe there could be improvements. gRPC has recently been implemented, which is great, along with TLS 1.2 and 1.3 support, and HTTP 2.0 is also available. However, I'm unsure about the benchmark of those HTTP 2.0 requests on HAProxy. If there were any other protocol with better performance than HTTP 2.0, or perhaps mTLS and other similar features, including that in HAProxy would be really great. For improvements, I think that during setup and configuration, the steps provided are neat and clear. Anyone can easily install and configure it. There are many kernel tuning parameters also available, which is great. For specific improvement, in terms of logging, I think printing the full object of the request may help, or if there's a way to reference two requests, it would be beneficial to find a complete session history from a logged-in customer, as it would help analyze customer and user analytics.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It can be tightly integrated system together with your Cisco ecosystem, and makes it a lot easier to manage as you have only one system integrator and one vendor to talk to."
"HAProxy enabled better performance at lower costs, which allowed us to provide more stability to our clients."
"The stability is good and passed all tests."
"I can't speak to all of the HAProxy features because we don't use them all, but load balancing is very good."
"We did not need technical support because the documentation is good."
"With each new release, I find very useful features and love each addition."
"The technical support has been, in one word, perfect. Every time I call, I’m on the phone with a representative within five minutes who is highly skilled and willing to help, whether in the case of critical issues or simple advice."
"Performance configuration options with threads, processes, and core stickiness are very valuable."
"It is stable. Period. Will not fail unless you do something wrong."
 

Cons

"The greatest problem with Cisco’s ADC offering is that they have ceased development of ACE hardware systems."
"The product does not have any new technologies."
"HAProxy could improve by making the dashboards easier to use, and better reports and administration tickets."
"The solution has bad performance issues."
"While troubleshooting, we are having some difficulties."
"Pricing, monitoring, and reports can be improved."
"Documentation could be improved."
"The deployment and configuration of HAProxy are not easy if we compare it with other solutions, such as F5."
"Full layer 7 SSL termination is limited to a single core, which is a problem."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price is well worth it. HAProxy Enterprise Edition paid for itself within months, simply due to the resiliency it brings. It was a bit more expensive than we were originally interested in paying, but we are thankful we chose to go with HAProxy."
"The only cost is for the image manager, who is responsible for uploading the image, and that is trivial."
"HAProxy is an open-source solution."
"If you don't have expertise then go with the licensed version. Otherwise, open-source is the best solution."
"It is free of cost."
"The product is open source."
"Very good value for the money. One of the simplest licensing schemes in this category of products."
"HAProxy is free software. There are optional paid products (support/appliances)."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise16
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Do you recommend HAProxy?
I do recommend HAProxy for more simple applications or for companies with a low budget, since HAProxy is a free, open-source product. HAProxy is also a good choice for someone looking for a stable ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HAProxy?
Since we used the open-source version, we were not concerned about pricing, setup cost, or licensing.
What needs improvement with HAProxy?
For the limited use that I have of HAProxy, I don't have any points to improve. I think I need more time with this tool, or perhaps I simply don't have areas that need to get better. I don't have a...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Application Control Engine
HAProxy Community Edition, HAProxy Enterprise Edition, HAPEE
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

LightEdge
Booking.com, GitHub, Reddit, StackOverflow, Tumblr, Vimeo, Yelp
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, NetScaler and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: October 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.