We performed a comparison between Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and SecureLink based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The system is reliable, simple and secure."
"This is a secure product that has had zero stability issues since I started using it in 2019."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it works all of the time."
"Easy to deploy and has good NAC integration."
"The solution is very easy to use and set up."
"The most valuable features are that it is really secure and very easy to use."
"For our company's needs, AnyConnect is sufficient and very easy to use."
"We have plans to increase the usage of this solution, it can scale well."
"The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The solution should not rely on tokens from the mobile application for logins."
"I have been working with the same interface for the last ten years. I would say that it needs some improvements made."
"If the Internet connection is not stable, it will create a disturbance when using the resources."
"We were going to use the Cisco AnyConnect with hardware tokens. However, right now, it's very complicated in terms of delivering the hardware token to the customer. That's why we are looking for a software token right now."
"Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client could improve by adding faster connectivity."
"The support could be more proactive in their recommendations. I noticed that the Cisco support agents tend to leave customers to do what they need to do in many ways, and you can choose how you want to do it. However, it would be great if they could proactively be involved in best practices and let other customers know how most people are doing it."
"The configuration from the client-side would be useful. Right now, it's not centralized. There should be a lock so that it can only be configured from one place."
"The notifications need to be improved. If the VPN is disconnected for a long period of time, they should push out notifications. We need to manually check if the VPN is connected or not. Sometimes it automatically disconnects, but the user doesn't get notifications, and we need to troubleshoot or open the client to manually reconnect. Auto-reconnection would be an improvement."
"The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough."
More Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 69 reviews while SecureLink is ranked 39th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is rated 8.6, while SecureLink is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client writes "A stable solution that helps users connect to resources when working from home". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecureLink writes "Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security". Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Check Point Remote Access VPN and Fortinet FortiClient, whereas SecureLink is most compared with Citrix Gateway, OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.