CircleCI vs JFrog Artifactory comparison

CircleCI and JFrog are both solutions in the AI Software Development category. CircleCI is ranked #200 with an average rating of 7.0, while JFrog is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0. CircleCI holds a 0.1% mindshare in ASD, compared to JFrog’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of CircleCI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

CircleCI

Read 7 CircleCI reviews

1,060 Views
42 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

JFrog Artifactory

Read 14 JFrog Artifactory reviews

4,468 Views
179 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

CircleCI

JFrog Artifactory

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

CircleCI and JFrog Artifactory are key players in software development, with CircleCI leading in pricing and support, while JFrog Artifactory is more feature-rich, making it a worthwhile investment.

Features:CircleCI supports container-based builds, integrates well with Bit Bucket, and enables easy configuration of Circle.yml files. It also offers automation workflows with third-party applications and strong GitHub integration. JFrog Artifactory excels in artifact management, supports multiple repository setups, and integrates with authentication systems like Active Directory. Its remote repo concept and permission management enhance flexibility.

Room for Improvement:CircleCI could improve documentation clarity and provide more examples for command-line usage. It would benefit from enhanced user experience and better support for non-DevOps users. Additionally, improving performance during uploads can enhance user satisfaction. JFrog Artifactory needs better documentation of its command-line interface and error messages. Examples for using features and faster upload performance can further enhance its offer. Streamlining customizations related to networking would also improve usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:JFrog Artifactory offers versatile deployment models, including on-premises and cloud offerings, with comprehensive support. CircleCI, primarily cloud-based, focuses on ease of use with rapid deployment and strong customer support.

Pricing and ROI:CircleCI is known for its cost-effectiveness, offering competitive pricing and efficient ROI through streamlined CI/CD processes. JFrog Artifactory, although requiring higher initial costs, offers long-term ROI via its extensive feature set, making it favorable for businesses prioritizing comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CircleCI vs. JFrog Artifactory Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CircleCI vs. JFrog Artifactory

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CircleCI

Ranking in AI Software Development

200th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (13th)

JFrog Artifactory

Ranking in AI Software Development

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Repository Managers (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of CircleCI is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Artifactory is 0.4%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Software Development Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
JFrog Artifactory	0.4%
CircleCI	0.1%
Other	99.5%

AI Software Development

Featured Reviews

RahulArora

Global Head - DevOps and AIOps Startegist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Automated CI/CD pipelines have transformed deployment speed and collaboration for my teams

CircleCI offers fast parallel builds, easy integration with GitHub, and the ability to deploy applications on Kubernetes pods, which are amazing features. Fast parallel builds and GitHub integration have definitely helped my team reach faster time to market for our applications. Previously, our deployment used to take a couple of hours when doing it manually, but with CircleCI pipeline, our hours-long job has been converted to a couple of minutes. Its simplicity, fast pipeline execution, and strong GitHub and GitLab integrations are definitely unique advantages I discovered while using CircleCI. Time saved is one of the key aspects I have seen since using CircleCI. I have noticed fewer deployment errors, and it has helped me with easy debugging. Time saved is directly proportional to the cost and effort saved. CircleCI has positively impacted my organization by integrating directly with my Git repositories as a fully managed SaaS platform. CircleCI has a great impact on my team's collaboration and communication, with around 25 to 40 developers and DevOps engineers using it daily across multiple repositories and environments, helping us use it at scale. CircleCI has significantly increased our release frequency and deployment speed compared to before I started using it. CircleCI improves security for my organization by enforcing automated checks in the pipeline and securely managing secrets through environment variables while providing auditable deployments. CircleCI integrates seamlessly with my DevOps toolchain by connecting directly to GitHub, container registries, and my cloud platform AWS, allowing the entire CI/CD flow from code commit to deployment and monitoring with minimal manual effort.

Read full review

reviewer2787339

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Integrated pipelines have improved enterprise deployments and now automate secure dependency flows

Regarding improvements for JFrog Artifactory, I remember that the documentation was more focused on the on-premises JFrog version. I was mostly redirected toward that, so I found a lack of specific or clear documentation on using JFrog Artifactory with AWS. I felt this gap two years ago, and there were capabilities such as X-ray or integrations with other AWS features that I found lacking at the time. I do not have much more to say about the needed improvements in integration or documentation, but I want to mention that, coming from a quality background, I think built-in quality gates for intelligent automation, vulnerability checks, or improved visibility and communication during slow responses or service downtime would be useful for visibility in distributed environments. Looking back, I think the learning curve for JFrog Artifactory could be eased, and the installation process could feel less overwhelming. While it is not that difficult, I have seen new joiners struggle with the initial setup. I think JFrog Artifactory could improve with some UX revamps since many tools these days provide very intuitive user experiences, and I believe that could be something to look into for the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate."

"It's a stable product."

"The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery."

"Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts."

"The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."

"The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc."

"CircleCI has significantly reduced build and deployment times, saving substantial engineering hours and effort for me, which has directly improved my productivity and release velocity, reflecting incredible ROI."

"CircleCI has positively impacted the organization, as it has been used for many years and serves as the main source for application deployment."

"The core functionality is most valuable for indexing and metadata of all the artifacts, but within the last year or two, we've been using the Projects feature, which has been very helpful. We can now assign individual admins for different projects and repos so that they can self-manage their own user permissions for their data. My IT DevOps team doesn't have to be the facilitators of that. It's now more of a self-service capability for them."

"The package registries have been helpful. GitLab, our previous solution, wasn't managing that well."

"The most valuable feature is that it is a centralized repository and that you can open multiple repositories for different types of artifacts."

"For the most part, it's pretty stable."

"The feature that I like is Permission Targets. If I want to give permission to only deploy the cache, I can give that permission to a set of users. Similarly, if I want to overwrite an artifact with the same name from the same pipeline, I can give permission for that as well to particular users."

"The most valuable feature I have found is the JFrog CLI."

"HPE was using it for a lot of things, and they certainly had a massive implementation."

Cons

"I believe debugging complex pipelines and managing credits can sometimes be challenging, especially for large workflows, so these areas can be improved."

"Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing."

"A return on investment with CircleCI has not been observed, and no relevant metrics such as time saved or fewer employees needed can be shared."

"The solution’s pricing could be better."

"Billing is a mess."

"There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI."

"The latest version that I am using is 7.41. It has been upgraded graphics-wise, but there is a bit of slowness. They can improve the graphical interface for the admin jobs and make it faster."

"I would like to see written technical support instead of having to contact them directly."

"The documentation is a bit sparse. That's our only complaint."

"We're looking for something that has additional reporting capabilities on data growth and data aging. This goes back to storage lifecycle management so that the actual Artifactory itself can provide these reports to either the administrators or the users. I don't know if it has those capabilities. That's something we have to look into regarding the self-service dashboard, but the tool itself having those capabilities would be great rather than trying to do it at the underlying storage hardware layer."

"It's an enterprise product that acts like an enterprise product. In other words, it's not a product where they focus on user experience. I wasn't an administrator, so I primarily worked with the command line tool to upload and download parts of the product. I was not impressed with that because it wasn't well documented. It was challenging to figure out how to get things to work."

"In some of the latest versions of JFrog's SaaS solution, they changed the user interface, the SSO settings, how you interact with them over API, and how you generate tokens. It was very confusing for me. The overall user management is very complicated."

"Sometimes the documentation was sort of messy because there are many possibilities for where and how to install Artifactory."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."

"I am not aware of its cost, but it is worth investing in this. My guess is that its price is not much because we generally prefer open-source solutions, and if we are investing, we don't go for expensive ones. Our selection is based on the market demand and needs, and we invest only if something is worth the cost."

"It is a bit expensive. It could be a little bit lower or have an a la carte option because, in our case, we had to go to the next version of Enterprise X because we needed one feature, which was more than three projects. We don't need all the other capabilities, but we're paying for all those. It's almost twice the cost of the previous version. So, it would be nice to have something along those lines."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

University

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CircleCI?

There is not much experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing because that is managed by the legal team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CircleCI?

CircleCI's Orbs are not as easy to use as they could be. If CircleCI implemented a function approach similar to GitHub Actions, it would be significantly better. CircleCI could be improved if it co...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CircleCI?

For others looking into using CircleCI, study thoroughly about CircleCI's Orbs because they are quite complicated. The overall review rating for CircleCI is 6 out of 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog Artifactory?

JFrog could improve this product with tighter integration capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JFrog Artifactory?

JFrog Artifactory is designed for software management. We used it for storing all assets and packages that were downloaded from external package systems, making them available for our development t...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JFrog Artifactory?

I am no longer using JFrog Artifactory in my current role as I moved away from the team. The metadata management features were very useful, particularly for managing packages inside JFrog Artifacto...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tekton vs CircleCI

Compared 13% of the time

GitLab vs CircleCI

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub Actions vs CircleCI

Compared 9% of the time

TeamCity vs CircleCI

Compared 9% of the time

Jenkins vs CircleCI

Compared 6% of the time

More CircleCI Competitors

Sonatype Nexus Repository vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 62% of the time

Archiva vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudsmith Ultra - Enterprise vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 10% of the time

Inedo ProGet vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 5% of the time

Bitbucket Data Center vs JFrog Artifactory

Compared 2% of the time

More JFrog Artifactory Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

January 2026

Download CircleCI product report

Buyer's Guide

JFrog Artifactory

January 2026

Download JFrog Artifactory product report

Overview

CircleCI is a continuous integration and delivery platform that automates software development, streamlining the process for engineers and developers. It's valued for its ability to enhance development speed while maintaining high software quality.

Known for its robust CI/CD capabilities, CircleCI supports a wide range of programming languages and integrations, allowing teams to build and deploy code with efficiency and reliability. Its flexibility and automation features help teams quickly adapt to changing project requirements. CircleCI's cloud-based architecture ensures scalability and accessibility, making it an attractive option for modern development environments.

What are CircleCI's key features?

Continuous Integration: Automates code integration with testing to catch errors early.
Continuous Deployment: Simplifies the process of deploying code to production environments.
Customizable Workflows: Offers flexibility in defining build, test, and deployment stages.
Parallel Execution: Speeds up builds by running multiple tasks at once.
VCS Integration: Seamlessly integrates with platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket.

What benefits can users expect when using CircleCI?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines development workflows, reducing the time to market.
Improved Code Quality: Early error detection through automation increases overall quality.
Scalability: Ability to handle growing workloads as development needs evolve.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared visibility and control over development processes.

In tech-driven industries, CircleCI enables efficient software development pipelines. Its ability to run automated tests and manage deployments effectively is particularly beneficial in fast-paced, innovation-driven fields like fintech, mobile app development, and SaaS platforms. Offering tools that meet high-demand environments, it supports teams in delivering timely and quality software products.

CircleCI

JFrog Artifactory is a powerful enterprise product designed for storing and managing different types of binaries, including artifacts, Dockery majors, and builds created as part of the CI process. It offers end-to-end binary management capabilities, integration with different environments and cloud providers, and a centralized repository with multiple repositories for different artifacts.

Artifactory has helped organizations modernize and automate their development operations, reducing the time it takes to develop and release software. It supports hybrid and multi-cloud environments, offers storage and database options flexibility, and integrates with other tools like Jira.

JFrog

Sample Customers

Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent

Oracle, Cisco, Cars.com, Riot Games, Google, CA Technologies

Buyer's Guide

CircleCI vs. JFrog Artifactory

December 2025

Free Report: CircleCI vs. JFrog Artifactory

Find out what your peers are saying about CircleCI vs. JFrog Artifactory and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CircleCI vs. JFrog Artifactory report.

See our list of best AI Software Development vendors.

We monitor all AI Software Development reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.